Chocolate Linked to Lower Blood Pressure

advertisement
This article is over 14 days old and has been removed by requirement of the Associated Press.
  • 8 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.1
{"commentId":42558,"authorDomain":"fritzg"}

Chocolate and wine are good for us. YES! Now I have even more reasons to give up nothing for lent. :-)

{"commentId":42558,"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604","authorDomain":"fritzg"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:12 PM EST
{"commentId":42580,"authorDomain":"thelevithorntonexperience"}

If Chocolate lowers blood pressure than I am the healthest person in the world!

{"commentId":42580,"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604","authorDomain":"thelevithorntonexperience"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:32 PM EST
{"commentId":42585,"authorDomain":"andria"}

I love this news too. However, just because chocolate is healthy, doesn't mean that most chocolate candies are healthy. A lot of them are mostly sugar, a most unhealthy food.

{"commentId":42585,"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604","authorDomain":"andria"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:36 PM EST
{"commentId":42592,"authorDomain":"fritzg"}

Endangered Species Chocolate, (http://www.chocolatebar.com/) is fair trade and organic and many of theri bars have a higher percentage of cocoa.

{"commentId":42592,"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604","authorDomain":"fritzg"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:46 PM EST
{"commentId":42708,"authorDomain":"Gene11"}

I have always wondered why I have low blood pressure maybe it really is from all the cocoa I eat. I also agree with fritzg, Endangered Species Chocolate is the best!

{"commentId":42708,"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604","authorDomain":"Gene11"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:12 PM EST
{"commentId":42805,"authorDomain":"fatboy"}

Who funds this stuff???? With so many conflicting studies by scientists (british of otherwise) I'm surprised people can still figure out what's good for them.

{"commentId":42805,"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604","authorDomain":"fatboy"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#6 - Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:12 PM EST
{"commentId":42933,"authorDomain":"andria"}

Ha, ha. Admittedly, to some extent we are just looking to justify things which we like. Many of these studies are funded by particular industries. So studies have to be repeated, done with more users, and have cause/effect more isolated before the public health groups will recommend that XYZ be added/removed from the diet. For example now there are more and more credible organizations talking about the need for Omega-3s. The USDA still hasn't come up with a recommended intake, but when it does, then most people will know it's good for them. I do think it would be helpful if these news articles would make an effort to provide references to more well-proven health information along with the "latest" findings. For example:
http://www.nutrition.gov/
http://www.whfoods.com/index.html

{"commentId":42933,"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604","authorDomain":"andria"}
    Reply#7 - Tue Feb 28, 2006 1:36 AM EST
    {"commentId":46449,"authorDomain":"fatboy"}

    Problem with these 'recommendations' is that many of these findings are often conflicting. ie. A glass of red wine is good for ur heart but bad for your liver etc

    The media will always push whatever sells papers. Senastional findings like 'Choclate is good for you' will always get more air time than 'bran keeps you regular'. As a result the public are always going to get a skewed view of what's good for them.

    {"commentId":46449,"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604","authorDomain":"fatboy"}
      Reply#8 - Thu Mar 2, 2006 7:21 PM EST
      {"commentId":46460,"authorDomain":"andria"}
      As a result the public are always going to get a skewed view of what's good for them.

      If newspapers are there only source of information, then this is probably true. But as I pointed out, there are reliable sources for better tested information and balanced recommendations.

      {"commentId":46460,"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604","authorDomain":"andria"}
        Reply#9 - Thu Mar 2, 2006 7:29 PM EST
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"30830","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"30830","contentId":"111604"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking