I think it would be funny if they kept him and then still benched him. True, as waste of money, but it would definitely get their message accross.
Dan Sampson writes:
I think it would be funny if they kept him and then still benched him. True, as waste of money, but it would definitely get their message accross.
True but with the new collective bargaining agreement this is no longer allowed.
doh!
He is a cancer to any team he goes to.
Hopefully, he goes to a team with a coach that won't put up with his b.s. from day one like a Parcells or Gibbs.
Finally...I'm tired of hearing about this debacle. Terrell killed the 49ers and hurt the Eagles (atleast divided the locker room). Maybe everyone can take a hint and see that this guy is bad news.
Let the Cowboys take him and bench him every game =)
A team would be crazy to sign him to a long term contract. But does that mean he will be relegated to a year-to-year player... a mercenary moving around to whatever team needs a really big receiver for a year?
Yeah he is a cancer.....
He is a disruption to any and all teams.... or is he??
But we all have to agree that he is one of the most talented recievers right now... hell he still finished in the top 30 recievers, and he only played half of a season (7 games)
I know I'll still keep him in my keeper league in fantasy football.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |