Apple Ruling Unlikely Before Easter

In this March 29, 2006, file photo, a record with an Apple Corps logo is seen placed on the top of an Apple computer with its logo, top left, in London. (AP Photo/Sang Tan)
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (4)
Personally, I think it's a blackmark on the good name of the Beatles that they're doing this. It just seems so much like wanting to get money off of Apple (Computer)'s success with the iPod and the iTMS.
Can I have a show of hands of people who actually knew of the Apple Corps Record Label, before the whole legal issue began?
A show of hands of people who think Apple Corps has only made a lot more money than they used to, since all this publicity started?
- 2 votes
It's all about the contract. And I hate to break it to you, but the Beatles are seriously about the money.
And yes, since I am 48 years old, I know all about Apple Corps. Anyone who ever bought a Beatles album/single knows about them.
Not to be disrespectful or anything, but I still think not too many people know about Apple Corps. Most people don't really care about the record companies that are behind their favorite CD's. It's the music they want, and they want to know more about the artists maybe; not who distributed it.
The ruling is going to be announced midday (UK) on monday 8th May 2006.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |


