GAUNTLET THROWN: President Bush called for the top 15 greenhouse gas producing nations, including the U.S., to set a goal for reducing the pollution by the end of 2008.
HOT TOPIC: The announcement could deflect criticism during next week's summit of leading industrialized nations, where global warming is sure to be discussed.
CLEARING THE AIR: The countries would begin talks this fall, but each would be able to develop its own strategy.
He also directed the Environmental Protection Agency to use its authority to temporarily waive air quality laws in states if that would relieve a local gasoline supply shortage.
What an excellent way to celebrate Earth Day.
Lol.
not when you concider the gov earth day website .. discredits enviromentalism, this like species going extinct is just a guess.. i love the page listing all the enviromental lobbiest and how much they spent.. all of them together isnt half of what verizon just gave them.. but you wont find that on the site..
resourcescommittee (dot) house (dot) gov/earthday/
sorry for the crappy link but when you are new they think you will link to porn or something.
http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/earthday/
Anyone find the setting with the fields behind the president highly ridiculous?
I agree Zaki that's the part that sticks out to me too... But normally the reasoning behind relaxing air/water quality standards is that it's better for business. It's easier, and it costs less money. And they're usually honest about that...
I didn't RT(whole)FA so maybe this is explained somehow after the opening 1/3. But how does relaxing air quality standards relieve gasoline shortages? There could easily be a logical explanation for this so I am legitimately asking if anyone knows what that is.
In the summer, many states are required to switch from the 'usual' gasoline blended with MTBE (methyl-tetr-butyl ether), to gasoline blended with ethanol. Both additives are used to provide more oxygen to combustion as to reduce CO and NOx emissions, though ethanol is much more efficient, and can be politically argued that it helps the US corn growers. In the summer this is very important because the combination of these emissions and higher temperatures can lead to smog and other very bad efects.
However, chemically, blending ethanol into gasoline is very difficult - think about trying to mix oil and water - while gas and MTBE is rather easy, and thus, as has happened for several years now, right about now (April), most producers have to temporarily shut down their refineries to add in the support for the ethanol mixing. The temporary lag does sometimes come into play with prices, but it's the ethanol addition itself that bumps the price up. There's also the general pricing increase that'd done right before Memorial Day since a high percentage of the US goes road-tripping then.
By removing the requirement for ethanol-blended gas, this means that refineries still running the MTBE mix can continue to do so, which is less cost to the oil companies, keeps the refinery going, and thus should reflect in lower costs for consumers, at the cost of spiking additional CO and other emissions for this summer. Though already many refineries are on the way to ethanol processing, so this won't be anything more than a few pennies on the gallon - if this was a month ago, it may have had more impact, but prices weren't rising a month ago.
Good explanation.
MTBE is also very poisonous and can destroy water tables if just a few gallons are spilled.
It looks like he did just enough to make both Republicans and Democrats happy and piss them both off at the same time.
Bush ... called for the repeal of $2 billion in tax breaks for profit-heavy oil companies.
Bush repealing a tax break? WHAT?!?!
Where is our President and what imposter is wearing his skin?
he should temporally repeal the federal gas tax.. that would make for immediate relief.
he should temporally repeal the federal gas tax..
Or, remove the tax on the industries. Free markets people. Free markets.
Or enact legislation to increase fuel-efficency so people use less. But that would be too easy.
That would be too long. Increasing fuel efficiency isn't something that is going to happen before Memorial Day.
free markets are not always the answer.
Here's an idea to ease our pain at the gas pump: call up any ONE of your drinking buddies at Exxon and tell him to give us a break. While you're at it you can repeal ANY AND ALL tax breaks being offered to oil companies. If they're so cash rich that they can offer a $400 million dolllar cash out to their outgoing CEO then they can sure as hell pony up their fair share of taxes. Bush's ties with oil and gas companies are unprecedented, so his assertion that he has little control over what's happening is laughable at best; it's worse when you consider a good portion of the people in his administration are either shareholders or boardmembers at major oil and gas concerns.
Man, I will be so relieved when this is over. I just don't think I can take one more day of this guy and his almost constant stream of criminal, borderline criminal or morally reprehensible activity.
Are we ready to impeach yet? Please?
I'm all for impeaching Bush, but guess what we would get as a result?
Cheney. *shudder*
it seems (from the Boston Globe).
Bush is providing only a temporary solution. Why not maintain high gas prices in order to get people thinking about other ways of getting around?
I see some of the logic in your statement. I now bike to work most days instead of paying $3.00+ a gallon. It is great exercise and It only takes about 10 minutes more each way. If you live close to where you work it is a great thing to do for you and the environment.
I bought an old bike just for that reason. I just have to replace the bearings in the rear wheel cup and it should work well.
The real problem is that we could never impose an Oil boycott. Because the one day per month that we all decide NOT to get oil, is when gas would be cheaper (for that day) at the gas station, and boom, exxon/mobil laughs, because consumers would crawl right back to get their fix.
Everytime I try to get out, they pull me right back in. -The Godfather Part III
The arguments put forth for high gas prices have never seemed credible to me... I mean... when you have Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhilips all making the Fortune 500 top ten last year with record profits, it's pretty obvious that prices are not this high simply because they "have to be," as a result of supply and demand.
I bet the price would have to be $5/gal before Oil companies started to see any quantifiable loss in *business*. Right now everyone's pretty much just taking it in the ass, for a lot of people there's really just no choice in the matter, and they know it obviously.
It's not that oil isn't more expensive for the oil companies, but they do hand that extra cost right down to the consumer, plus a healthy bit more just in case things get worse. It makes logical or even moral sense, provided the corporations don't consider for even an instant the fact that consumers have no way to take our own inflated costs and pass them on down the line. It's not like everybody in America can just ask for a raise to cover gas costs.
If the folks at Exxon Mobil et al don't want to play fair and shoulder some of the burden of tight oil supply, it's the people's responsibility to make them. And since, as has already been eloquently stated, we can't exactly boycott gas for a few weeks, we have to get the government to intervene for us. The fact that this is so difficult to do is indictive of the great power imbalance that exists in american society. What's worse, I have yet to hear any really viable suggestions on how to fix it.
Ideas, anybody?
Out of all the possibilities of really doing anything about it, he waives the air quality law?!
Regardless, I am kind of pleased that the gas prices are going up and people with gas guzzling SUVs will suffer. Now behavioral changes will happen. Unfortunately this also impacts the lower-income families. There is simply no one right solution. *sigh*
So, they get to raise prices and their punishment is a waiver on air quality laws?
Seems kinda win-win for them.
Not surprisingly few in America feel like they're winning.
Check out that picture.
Gimme a a hug, ya big ol' fuzzy bear.
Don't try that. I did, and look where I am - federal penitentiary. *sigh*
:p
Aww, they changed the picture. It was better before.
Big Oil is actually reducing output to create an artificial 'shortage' that in turn causes prices to be artificially inflated. There's also the oil speculators whose sole purpose of existence is to sit there and wait for the slightest sign of potential politcal unrest (i.e. Iran, Nigeria, etc) to justify raising the prices on oil futures.
It's a straight up hustle.
GOOD!
Let's ease the restrictions on drilling in ANWAR, too while we're at it.
Wow, another brilliant, short-lived plan that really does nothing to fix the problem - didn't see that one coming. It seems like every time I feel GW might just come out and say something to make me like him (I was hoping for a Jimmy Carter-style turn down your thermostat, do your part to conserve plan) - he does something that only makes me loathe him more. His plan is basically "don't change your habits at all, we'll do something...kinda."
if only we could harness the power of political hot air
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |