GAUNTLET THROWN: President Bush called for the top 15 greenhouse gas producing nations, including the U.S., to set a goal for reducing the pollution by the end of 2008.
HOT TOPIC: The announcement could deflect criticism during next week's summit of leading industrialized nations, where global warming is sure to be discussed.
CLEARING THE AIR: The countries would begin talks this fall, but each would be able to develop its own strategy.
What a bad idea. Just how many Bushes have to be planted before they cover everything up.
That's a hilarious pun man hahahaha. Good work! The best bit is that it's kinda true!
Finally someone gets it :)
This will never happen.
Lefist: They said the same thing about a Bush Second Term too!
How about the twins instead?
Arnold and Devito?
The Olsen Twins?
Jenna Bush is so farking hot. *FAP*
I guess the right is tired of "the Kennedys?" Well, I'm tired of this family.
Yeah, and at least the Kennedys weren't war criminals.
Ah... maybe not "war criminals," but some have clearly been criminals none the less. Bootleg money makes them rich, then you have further mafia connections, dead people voting in Chicago, Chappaquidick, William Kennedy-Smith, Michael Skakel, and more. I also seem to remember the clusterf**k called the "bay of pigs" — clearly not a high point of American presidential decision-making. I don't think this record is much better than that of the Bushies.
I'm not a fan of either family, although I do have admiration for Robert Kennedy.
Leftist, let me state for the record I favor Kennedys over Bushes. That said, JFK did attempt to invade Cuba (in violation of the UN Charter), and did escalate Vietnam (again, in violation of the UN Charter). You can't accuse Bush of being a war criminal and then by the same standard aquit JFK.
Just for the record, the Bay of Pigs incident actually began under Eisenhower. The National Security Archives has a chronology of the events, as well as a collection of documents related to it. We had actually been bombing Cuba prior to JFK even being elected.
Oh, good lord. The last thing America needs is a Bush dynasty.
Thankfully, the Bush name has been "tainted", and America wouldn't stand for it (though with friends like Diebold, that may no longer matter.)
I agree, I don't think it would ever happen, even if he did run. There would be too much talk of a 'dynasty' and that has a tendency to rub people a little wrong. We have term limits for a reason and I think Americans in general would not respond well to another Bush running for President. Sure, he is a different guy, but he is still a Bush.
Why isn't the current Bush presidency dynastic? There's at least one Republican who thinks so.
You got to be retard3d if you think Jeb has any chance of wining. The country isn't THAT stupid ... oh wait, thats right we did reelect GWB. Be very fearful of the republican FUD.
This scares me. Really scares me. But I have faith that this country isn't going to turn into a monarchy.
If he prays daily that will win him 40% of the countries vote.
How will this turn America into a monarchy?
Political aristocracies in America? Oh no, somebody call George Washington!
Please. Get real. They happen all the time and will continue to do so. This aristocracy thing is a feature of human government since, like, FOREVER. Only way to get rid of it is to get rid of every single human who seeks to take advantage over his neighbor and even that won't work because evil people get born every day and AAAAAAIIIIEEEE!!!
This is why the foundin' fathers wanted all Americans to have guns and for states to have more rights relative to the federal gov't. Except Hamilton. Phooey on Hamilton.
DISCLAIMER: I think Thomas Paine was a neat guy.
By 146 BC the Romans were the only important power left in the Mediterranean Sea, and they controlled almost all of its coastline.
But there was trouble at home. First, two brothers named Cornelius Gracchus and Gaius Gracchus tried to get some of the Italian land given back to the poor people. But the rich aristocrats in the Senate didn't want to give the land back. In 133 and 123 BC the Senators themselves, with a lot of their followers, rushed up to the brothers and killed them (on two different occasions)! What is worse, nothing at all happened to those murdering Senators.
That was the beginning of the end of the Roman Republic..... Oddly familiar to The Americans who ca see the parallels between the Kennedy's and the Gracchus brothers.
As my 9th grade history teacher always said,
"Learning about history is important so it doesn't come back around to kick you in the ass."
Exact words and so true.
Republican Conservatives don't want to hear a HISTORY LESSON, makes them too nostalgic about how it still could be if they always had power, the same never changing.
Uh........ Slavery was ended by a Republican, Lincoln, who wanted change for his country, don't make blanket statements, on either side of the fence.
I thought the the Republicans hated Lincoln when he was in power.
Republicans have changed a lot since then.
The Republicans in Lincoln's time were the Democrats of now, roughly speaking.
Welcome to America where everyone has a right to an opinion.
That is right.......MINE :-)
aronoff,
The party of lincoln had left those roots by the time Teddy was in office. Teddy was a republican because he had always been one, but his party elite was one of big business and rich fat cats. That is the reason that when he ran against taft in the republican primary, even though he had more delegates, they put taft up for reelection.
No. I think we need to get to work on a law that prohibits more than 1 person from the same family becoming President.
That would keep Hillary out. The left wouldn't go for it. Hillary will keep herself out of the White House.
I'm part of the Left. I'd go for that. I don't want Hillary on the ballot for president.
Jeb wouldn't get past the primaries. At this point, barring something drastic happening, he is unelectable. Unless there's an "October Surprise" in the works...
Save Jeb for 2012, after four years of Hilary Clinton.
That's gotta be on a RNC memo somewhere...
My thoughts exactly =D
"I have no idea what he's going to do. I've asked him that question myself. I truly don't think he knows,"
Some people criticize countries of the 'Global South' for falling short on checks and balances that would counter nepotism in a political system. Moreover, many states had to pass an 'anti-nepotism- law to make sure this 'disease' won't happen again. We've already had Father and Son. Adding a Brother to this 'Dynasty' would be tragic!
"Oh, good lord. The last thing America needs is a Bush dynasty."
Great quote, HelpMeImpeachBush, btw.
Awww c'mon, he's kidding, right?
Hahahaha Jeb?
Yes yes yes...Let him run
then we'll see those nice scandals he was involved with during the 2000 Presidential elections in Florida.
For those of you who don't care, tell that to the poor black communities who "ended up" voting in high majority for GWB instead of Kerry. Poor counties in Florida do not vote in majority for Bush.
If my Kerry vote went out for Bush, you'd be sure I'd reopen the gates of Hell underneath those volunteer workers
Kerry? 2000? I meant Gore! Why didn't u guys correct me? haha
But hey, whether it was 2000 or 2004 in Florida, DIEBOLD helped rig elections...so yeah whatever. lol.
this is the most funny news i've heard for the last half a year! thanks for a nice laugh! keep that going, brothers!
No. I think we need to get to work on a law that prohibits more than 1 person from the same family becoming President.
Why didn't you like Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt?
BTW - for those of you who think Jeb could never win because of the current climate surrounding his brother, how many of you were saying the same things about George W. considering the climate surrounding his father.
FDBryant3, excellent point - that made me think. It's all a little fuzzy in my (deteriorating) brain, but I think you're right. I was confident enough that I voted for Nader, something I regret every day of my life. I just couldn't imagine that the United States could be dragged backwards instead of moving forward. I know better now. It's wise not to be too confident in how things are going to go in the future - you just never know.
And I'll never forget what MY political science professor said:
"A Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner."
I'd like to posit some well-reasoned, insightful commentary, but all I can think is:
Bwahhahahahahahahahahahahaha
I feel the same way ;)
(and I'm a Floridian)
why is this listed as news? this is a press release from the whitehouse. Who seeds this bunk?
Nedra Pickler, AP Writer
why is this listed as news? this is a press release from the whitehouse. Who seeds this bunk?
Hmm... Stephen Colbert may have something to say about this:
Here's how it works: the president makes decisions. He's the decider. The press secretary announces those decisions, and you people of the press type those decisions down. Make, announce, type. Just put 'em through a spell check and go home.
FOX are trying to push family value's in the White House
...so that's what they mean..
Nedra... ahhhh, I remember Nedra. She's usually in the White House Press Corps and gets called on fairly frequently... pretty good stenographer. Bush the Decider, Nedra the typist.
Dripping sarcasm:
Bush-Santorum 2008!
I'd like to see the polling numbers on that pair together...
Actually, that doesn't sound like a bad ticket.
Actually it sounds pretty bad.
Only from a certain point of view.
Yeah, I'm sure the morality police would love that ticket. Might even get them federal funding for more jackboots.
...jackboots.
..it never fails to amaze me the amount vile comments the lib`s can spew..no class...
Rob_NC - I'm a liberal. Why do you feel the need to insult me? You don't know me, brother - you don't know a single thing about me, and yet here you are claiming that, because I'm a "lib," I have no class. I'll tell you what, I've got enough class not to judge every conservative based on the thoughtless and hateful comments af a single person.
..the term jackboots comes from where ..??..so yes I can label ANYONE who uses that terminology to label an American president ...(((NO CLASS)))..don't like it then don't use such defamatory partisan rhetoric ...and don`t you find it interesting I was spot on, on your political leanings...its obvious...
..Brad I thought I was addressing (((Vulgrin)))..but I still stand by my comment ,its disgraceful to in anyway compare Hitlers monstrous minion's to any American..
Uh, Rob_NC, I have a feeling you didn't read what you're responding to. The term "jackboots" which seems to have set you off came from a comment in which Vulgrin referred to the "morality police." The basis for that comment was Senator Santorum's sanctimonious and hypocritical pronouncements regarding various "moral" issues. No "American president" was mentioned. Incidentally, the only high-profile use of the term "jackboot" was by President Bush's father, who used the term to refer to federal firearms agents.
don't like it then don't use such defamatory partisan rhetoric
Again, Rob_NC, I didn't use the term. Get it? Wasn't me. And yet, your response is to make a claim about MY character. I respect your conservative opinion, Rob_NC, so I'm not going to insult conservatives in general, nor am I going to insult you personally. How about you return the favor? A mark of maturity and reason, not to mention "class," is the ability not to sweat the little things, and the sense to realize they're all little things.
You begin to make coherent conservative arguments without stooping to personal attacks and insults and you may just earn a reputation as someone who's opinion is worth reading. Keep making it personal, and you'll end up with the reputation you deserve.
PS: I think you may be having a problem with your keyboard. The paren keys "(" and ")" seem to be repeating, and either your shift key or your capslock appears to be sticking.
..Brad I thought I was addressing (((Vulgrin)))..but I still stand by my comment ,its disgraceful to in anyway compare Hitlers monstrous minion's to any American..
Rob_NC, I appreciate you noticing that. A lot of people would not have made the effort - thanks.
Of course, if you are going to stand by the whole thing even knowing that, I guess I've pretty much said what I had to say above.
Bush-Santorum 2008!
Might even get them federal funding for more jackboots.
The basis for that comment was Senator Santorum's sanctimonious and hypocritical pronouncements regarding various "moral" issues. No "American president" was mentioned.
..so again Brad you are wrong..fess up to it..he gave direct direction at both men..so it looks like the reading needs to be on your end not mine...use that rhetoric expect to be called on it..period..
The point here is, Rob_NC, that you responded to what you perceived to be a slap at the President by making a baseless and personal attack against all liberals. While I'm sure that would probably earn you some points over at redstate, powerline, or free republic, around here it's pretty much just going to get you a reputation as a troll, and not a lot of respect.
I'm trying to let you know that there is no need for it to come to that. If you have conservative opinions which you would like to express as a way of trying to influence other people, there are plenty of people here who would like to hear them.
Write an article about some of the great features of your conservative ideology. You'll get comments, and you'll have a chance to exchange points of view with a variety of people - some who agree with you and some who don't. If you just want to troll the comments looking for people to insult, one of the conservative blogs is really the best place for that. Doing it here won't increase the amount of respect you get, and it doesn't help the other conservatives here either. Just let that stuff go, man.
You can be assured that if Vulgrin went around making insulting remarks about "the conservatives" or "the 'right'" all of the time, he'd develop the same type of reputation that you are working on. A mark of maturity is the ability to sometimes just let it go, and to avoid the temptation to insult other people just because you feel that someone you admire has been insulted. It's a website, it's not a schoolyard. Get smarter here.
Brad ..sorry if you don't like the way I expressed my views..frankly that`s your problem not mine..I think anyone reading this little tit for tat sees the jest of the issue..the extreme on the left can spew their venom and dare anyone to call them on it; well sir I for one will call you or anyone who spews it..accepting my views well lets just say to keep this clean the phrase comes from GONE WITH THE WIND...
A mark of maturity is the ability to sometimes just let it go
..that's precious..Can I keep that for future reference..
..that phrase should be passed around I`ll admit..but it wont..so Ill see you at the ballot box...and then remind you of your words...
OK, Rob_NC, you've shown me what you're made of.
ROFL this is great! Let's try another word or two and see what connotations people dig up:
drug-addict
indian casino
land deal
global warming
speech impediment
Pick any three, link them to something that morally offends you, and write a 500 word essay about why the [insert opposite viewpoint and / or party here] should all be called a [expletive, body part or bodily function here]
They should throw Neil Bush on the ticket, as well. Might as well get all of the criminal Bush family- Noelle can take Kathleen Harris' job.
President Bush suggested Wednesday that he'd like to see his family's White House legacy continue...
[Extreme sarcasm on]
- What happened, Dubya, the clones aren't working out?
- In today's episode of the Twilight Zone, the spectre of a hellish election looms: another Bush vs. another Clinton.
- Somebody nuke us. Please.
[Extreme sarcasm off]
Seriously, this all seems too cartoonishly bad to be real. I would ignore it except that there's been too much cartoonishly bad stuff coming out of Washington that was real.
Might as well. What this country needs at a time like this is consistent leadership. Neither Hillary nor anyone else from the Democratic party could successfully take the reigns from Bush at this point. The entire political system has been rearranged and the only ones who understand the inner workings are the current administration. Due to the incredible amount of secrecy involved, we can not afford to trust anyone else to the position. Any Democrat would reveal the inner workings for political advantage. "oooh! look at all the sneaky, illegal stuff they've been doing behind closed doors!" All momentum towards global sovereignty would bottleneck. There's no way anyone but the current administration can continue the task at hand. It doesn't matter how you vote. The future is coming.
Oceania is at War with Eurasia. Oceana has Always has been at War with Eurasia.
You've got it all wrong, Orwell. What we need to do is hand over the election to someone who looks like a Democrat, but is actually on the inside. That way, people will setlle back, breathe a sigh of relief, and not question for a few years...
Republics.
Crap. R-E-P-U-B-L-I-C-A-N-S. whew.
well... a little rightious anger never hurt anyone, eh?
oh yeah, I didn't say "screwed up."
You've got it all wrong, Orwell. What we need to do is hand over the election to someone who looks like a Democrat, but is actually on the inside. That way, people will settle back, breathe a sigh of relief, and not question for a few years...
..hey that sounds like John McCain..
I much as I like Governor Jeb Bush, he will not run in '08 and should not run ever. It just sends a bad message keeping the presidency "in the family." On the other hand, I would trade the 12 years of George Bushes for 8 of Jeb Bush in a second. Jeb Bush's politics are rather different from his brothers, and tend far more towards the more traditional conservative than the neoconservative and "compassionate conservative" George W. Bush.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |