Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Israel Buys 2 Nuclear-Capable Submarines

Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:06 PM EDT
world-news, iran, israel, deterring, german-made-dolphin
Ramit Plushnick-Masti, Associated Press

In this image released by the Israeli Defense Force the crew of Israel's Dolphin submarine, stand on deck during a ceremony Sunday, July 25, 1999 between Crete and Cyprus in the Mediterranean Sea, commemorating the 69 crew members of the Israeli submarine Dakar which sank here in 1968. With the purchase of two more German-made Dolphin submarines, Israel is sending a clear message to Iran that it can strike back if attacked by nuclear weapons, military experts said Thursday, Aug. 24, 2006.(AP Photo/IDF)

Advertise | AdChoices
This article is over 14 days old and has been removed by requirement of the Associated Press.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Ramit Plushnick-Masti's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Germany , Israel , Iran , Jerusalem
  • Public Discussion (63)
JoulesBeef

i wonder what the people would say if iran was the purchacer of these subs.
not trying to be anti isreal, just interesting different emotions simular news makes.

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:16 PM EDT
enigma

It's complete BS that some countries are "allowed" to have nuclear weapons and protect themselves and others are not. If the threat of using them is the deciding factor, then the US shouldn't be allowed to have them, being the only nation to have used them (and against civilians, no less).

  • 15 votes
#1.1 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:40 PM EDT
Moncrey

Seriously! Its only a matter of time until one detonates, whether it is fired or accidental. Its absurd that they are even legal anywhere in the world. I hear the US is creating new nukes as well... I sure hope we dont have to face nuclear war. But i guess its not up to us, its up to the arrogant bastards with the missiles.

SIGH.

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:49 PM EDT
ignoblus

It's complete BS that some countries are "allowed" to have nuclear weapons and protect themselves and others are not.

It's more history and circumstance. In any case, Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel didn't. (Just for the record, it was France that helped and encouraged the Israeli program, and the US that insisted on Israel keeping it an open secret.)

  • 7 votes
#1.3 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:10 PM EDT
TBone

Enigma - spot on. I support Iran's right to defend itself. And Jordon's, Egypt's, etc. etc. Someone holds a gun to my head, I'm getting a gun.

  • 3 votes
#1.4 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:03 PM EDT
ASSMAN

I don't think you guys understand.. some countries, like Israel, are allowed the weapons because they are trusted to only use them in self-defense - while other countries, like Iran, are not allowed nukes because they threaten to destroy countries they don't like and what better way to do that than with nukes. If these rogue nations don't have nukes and the victim of the threats do, then they are able to hide behind the nukes like a fence.

There is no country under more constant threat of destruction than Israel. So they gain support internationally in order to defend themselves.

  • 13 votes
#1.5 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:46 PM EDT
TBone

Wow, you've turned the Iranian's into boogeymen. Are you racist?

  • 1 vote
#1.6 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:47 PM EDT
insert_name_here

Maybe Iran just doesn't have a democratically elected government that can be easily influence by the United States. That is why we don't trust them.

Race has nothing to do with it. Not to mention, Moshe Katsav, the President of Israel is Iranian.

  • 8 votes
#1.7 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:50 PM EDT
enigma

Assman:

some countries, like Israel, are allowed the weapons because they are trusted to only use them in self-defense

I think this latest war in Lebanon shows just how much restraint Israel really has. Unless you're naive enough to call that a war of self-defense. Yeah, F-16s against hand-held rocket launchers -- the model of reasonable and responsible self-defense.

  • 2 votes
#1.8 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:20 PM EDT
ASSMAN

"Responsible" self defense? If they are under attack does it make sense to dumb down their excellent defense force in order to match Hezbollah's more erratic attacks? That doesn't make any sense. Of course they used disproportionate force - it's called beating the enemy at their game.

And did they use atomic weapons? No.

  • 6 votes
#1.9 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:08 AM EDT
Killfile

And did they use atomic weapons? No.

Well thank God we have such an exacting metric for the reasonable behavior of sovereign states. I can see President Bush addressing the nation now

"Well we were having problems, see, with the insurgo-facists in Baghdad so I asked Peter over here... wave Pete.... Pete is the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs... so I asked Pete to just go ahead a carpet bomb Baghdad. Man you oughtta see it our pilots can barrel that thing in so low, oh it's a sight to see. You wouldn't expect it with a big ol' plane like a '52, but varrrooom! The jet exhaust... frying chickens in the barnyard!

Well the point is at least we didn't use nukes"

  • 3 votes
#1.10 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:21 AM EDT
ignoblus

Compare the number of civilian deaths in Lebanon with those in any other current conflict, like Darfur, Chechnya, or Iraq.

  • 2 votes
#1.11 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:37 AM EDT
Killfile

Uh.... Darfur is a genocide. Do you really want to compare Lebanon to Darfur?

  • 2 votes
#1.12 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:50 AM EDT
ignoblus

A lot of people have actually called the war in Lebanon an attempt at ethnic cleansing, so it might be useful to point out how stupid that idea is. Chechnya and Iraq are much closer examples. Go ahead and look up the death rates in each, then compare with Lebanon.

  • 2 votes
#1.13 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:56 AM EDT
Reply
Killfile

What is it with the AP putting up stories that match my previous seeds? That's the second time today I've seen an AP story on a seed I put up earlier this week!

    Reply#2 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:47 PM EDT
    the_leander

    Face it killfile - they love you ;-)

      #2.1 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:56 PM EDT
      insert_name_here

      It's OK with me, considering Websense WebNONsense blocks Killfile's column, but no other part of newsvine...

      • 1 vote
      #2.2 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:46 PM EDT
      Killfile

      Huh? Websense blocks my column?

        #2.3 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:27 PM EDT
        insert_name_here

        I'm afraid it does, at least for my school.

        It is under "Message Boards and Clubs". The rest of Newsvine works fine. Heres a link to a picture of the page I get when I try to access it.

        I wonder what you did...

        • 2 votes
        #2.4 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:57 PM EDT
        Reply
        Channie821

        The purchases come at a time when Iran is refusing to bow to growing Western demands to halt its nuclear program, and after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map."

        "They (Iran) have a belligerent leadership and that's why Israel is prudent in ensuring that it has that deterrent capability," Beaver said. "What they (the submarines) are is a very good insurance policy."

        Good.
        When a country publicly says they want to wipe another country off the map, that other country is right to have an "insurance policy" available.

        I hope they never have to use it.

        • 9 votes
        Reply#3 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:01 PM EDT
        lzhang

        Bad. What's the point of continuing this cycle of escalation and proliferation? All this is going to lead to is a big radioactive accident.

          #3.1 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:20 PM EDT
          Channie821

          I think you need to ask Iran that question.

          They are the ones threatening annihalation for Israel.

          and even though people disagree, Israel does have the right to defend herself.

          • 8 votes
          #3.2 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:29 PM EDT
          lzhang

          Of course Israel has the right to defend itself, as well as Iran and any other sovereign country. The US needs to it's best to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. At the same time, the US and the world powers need to proceed with nuclear disarmament as well.

          Let's not engage in hypocrisy. If we don't want Iran to get nukes, we shouldn't be complicit with Israel (who hasn't joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) from obtaining them.

          • 3 votes
          #3.3 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:45 PM EDT
          Channie821

          Of course Israel has the right to defend itself, as well as Iran and any other sovereign country.

          you are putting Israel and Iran on the same level.
          And NO WAY is Iran on the same level with Israel.
          and you are saying that they are the same, they are just defending themselves.

          Exactly who is Iran defending itself from?

          I hope you don't say Israel, it wasn't Israel that said they want to wipe Iran off the map.

          I see the future...
          Iran, or Syria, or hezbol again, attacks Israel...and people here will be saying how evil Israel is for attacking first (these people will conveniently forget that it wasn't Israel that attacked first), Israel is the real terrorists, occupiers...blah, blah, blah...

          • 7 votes
          #3.4 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:57 PM EDT
          jjsonpDeleted
          Vent

          you are putting Israel and Iran on the same level. And NO WAY is Iran on the same level with Israel.

          True, Iran haven't been invading and occupying other countries for the past half decade.

          • 2 votes
          #3.6 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:53 PM EDT
          insert_name_here

          true...iran was a country that was already there 60 years ago and had been for a very very long time, whereas 'israel' was created in 1948 by europeans.

          i suppose that iran would prefer that the european colony in its region *not* be armed with nuclear weapons, but luckily they have no say in the matter, right?

          True, Iran haven't been invading and occupying other countries for the past half decade.

          Damn straight, you guys. Ethiopian and Chinese Jews, as well as those who have lived in the area that is now Israel for hundreds of years, are figments of my imagination, and Israel has never been actually attacked.

          • 5 votes
          #3.7 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:10 PM EDT
          Vent

          True, Iran haven't been invading and occupying other countries for the past half decade.

          sorry, I meant half century :S

            #3.8 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:14 AM EDT
            Reply
            jjsonpDeleted
            djd

            Israel has been the largest recipient of U.S. foreign assistance for almost 30 years, and since 1985 has received about $3 billion in military and economic aid each year - most of that goes back to U.S. arms manufacturers. Looks like the Germans have jumped on the bandwagon.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#5 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 6:34 PM EDT
            jjsonpDeleted
            Don Taylor

            "however you look at it, i'd really prefer that the US opt out of all the shenanigans."

            That's a fantastic idea! Lets build a big dark house where one room has a nice bit of sand and bury our heads in it until everything is all ice cream and teddy bears. You do realize that we are suppose to be running the government right? Not the government running us. But we keep doing things like looking the other way, paying more attention to the fact that Jessica Simpson said her ex had small equipment instead of asking what our officials are packing and doing behind our backs. And don't give me the tired excuse of what can I do? The answer is get out of the house. Isolation and xenophobia beliefs lead to nothing but totalitarianism.

            • 4 votes
            #5.2 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:06 PM EDT
            Channie821

            thanks to angry dog 1941, I am able to present these facts!

            US Foreign Aid in 2002 (per the March 24th, 2003 issue of Newsweek with "Why America Scares the World" on the cover):

            Egypt: $2 Billion
            Jordan: $227 million
            Turkey: $3.3 Billion
            Palestine: $387 million
            Pakistan: $921 million
            Indonesia: $125 million
            Afghanistan: $297 million
            Uzbekistan: $96 million

            America is very generous to Muslim countries, America is not one-sided when it comes to foreign aid, and any demand to stop foreign aid to Israel while openly accepting our money from Muslim countries is total and complete hyprocrisy.

            dj & jj, are you annoyed at the moslem countries that get American money as well???

            • 7 votes
            #5.3 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:43 PM EDT
            djd

            And how much did the US give to Iran, Syria and the Lebanon in 2002?

            • 2 votes
            #5.4 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:45 AM EDT
            Writer X

            I was just wondering. Doesn't the US have one of the cheapest gas prices in the world? Isn't it able to influence many nations to go it's way? I wonder why?

            • 2 votes
            #5.5 - Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:10 AM EDT
            AdipicAcid

            I don't know about one of the cheapest, as I think most oil producing countries have prices even lower than we do. Of the oil importing nations, our prices do tend to be lower due to lower taxes on petroleum.

              #5.6 - Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:10 PM EDT
              Reply
              djd

              And here I find that my government [UK] doubled its arms exports to Israel last year.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#6 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:24 PM EDT
              jjsonpDeleted
              Don Taylor

              Free trade, I back. Non-interventionism is not possible in this world anymore. Everything is so tightly entwined that when something happen on the third floor of the apartment building, it affects the guy on the fourteenth floor. Giving someone a weapon of mass destruction and then telling them "I've giving this to you, but I don't want to know what you are going to do with it" is utterly moronic. If all we think about is bottom line then we are done for.

                Reply#8 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:03 PM EDT
                Reply
                jjsonpDeleted
                jjsonpDeleted
                mightyticker

                Great facts Channie821!

                • 1 vote
                Reply#11 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:41 PM EDT
                Channie821

                thank you! :)

                • 1 vote
                #11.1 - Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:56 PM EDT
                Reply
                Gianna523

                I've enjoyed reading all of your comments; both sides have good points.
                The thing that strikes me most about Iran vs. Israel having nuclear weapons is the fact that
                Iran supports, funds, provides arms to, and harbors terrorists.
                I don't know about you, but a country that supports terrorism is the LAST one I'd want to have nuclear weapons. Just something to consider...

                • 2 votes
                Reply#12 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 7:27 AM EDT
                Vent

                Well, some of us consider Israel as a terrorist State...

                • 2 votes
                #12.1 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:11 AM EDT
                the_leander

                I thought that the Likud (sp?) party were also born of a terrorist organisation... Pretty certain of it in fact.

                Also seem to recall reading about how Israel funded Hamas in order to destabilise the PLO's base. This second one could well be wrong, but I have heard it repeated often.

                As it stands, Israel is actively terrorising one of it's neighbours populations... Not to mention killing them by the hundreds and displacing them by the tens of thousands. It'll take decades for Lebanon to rebuild after this.

                  #12.2 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:02 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  jjsonpDeleted
                  djd

                  Good comments and links all round. I'm sad with the time difference that I was in bed for the second half of these postings.

                    Reply#14 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:00 PM EDT
                    Captain Amazing

                    Here's an idea, and maybe I'm completely wrong about this so correct me if that is the case, but why do countries that already have nuclear weapons insist on getting more when they should be developing a nuclear defence program or something? I understand that it is kind of off topic, but the time and money would be much better spent if there was a way to prevent a nuclear attack, than just investing more money into a way to strike back if it happens. I guess if I was the leader of a country, I'd be more worried about the lives of my citizens than striking back after a countries attacks.

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#15 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:53 PM EDT
                    Killfile

                    Nuclear submarines are a way to prevent a nuclear attack. If you have a gun and I have a gun which ever one of us fires first lives. If we both have guns but we also both have friends with sniper rifles hidden away covering us, even the one that fires first is going to die. Thus, neither of us fires and we back down and go home.

                    It's deterrence.

                      #15.1 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:17 PM EDT
                      Vulgrin

                      Here's an idea, and maybe I'm completely wrong about this so correct me but how about we just give the world leaders a brain or penile transplant or a joint or a blowjob or whatever its going to take for them to realize that killing people isn't the answer to solve problems?

                      Its freaking crazy what we do to each other.

                      • 1 vote
                      #15.2 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:00 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      TurgidBoil

                      Well at least the dudes in black suits, hats and the long curly locks aren't running the subs, eh?

                        Reply#16 - Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:01 PM EDT
                        Leave a Comment:
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                        Newsvine Privacy Statement
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                        FUN STUFF:
                        • Leaderboard |
                        • E-Mail Alerts |
                        • Top of the Vine |
                        • Newsvine Live |
                        • Newsvine Archives |
                        • The Greenhouse |
                        COMPANY STUFF:
                        • Code of Honor |
                        • Company Info |
                        • Contact Us |
                        • Jobs |
                        • User Agreement |
                        • Privacy Policy |
                        • About our ads
                        LEGAL STUFF:
                        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com