GAUNTLET THROWN: President Bush called for the top 15 greenhouse gas producing nations, including the U.S., to set a goal for reducing the pollution by the end of 2008.
HOT TOPIC: The announcement could deflect criticism during next week's summit of leading industrialized nations, where global warming is sure to be discussed.
CLEARING THE AIR: The countries would begin talks this fall, but each would be able to develop its own strategy.
Plan my #$!#C#.
IF it is a plan you can rest assured that it isn't well thought out at all.
It's simply an excuse to do what he's been doing all along-including the lies and the stripping away of freedoms for us all.
"There is no week nor day nor hour when tyranny may not enter upon this country, if the people lose their roughness and spirit of defiance."-Walt Whitman
Nice Whitman quote, Gunner. Sadly, Bush would probably tweak it a bit:
"There's no week or day or hour when bad men won't attempt horrible acts on this country, if we don't remain really, really vigilant."
IF it is a plan you can rest assured that it isn't well thought out at all.
Don't confused a "bad, well thought out plan" with just a "bad plan."
Most likely he and his advisories put a good deal of thought into this plan, and it was the best that they could come up with.
Its kinda like a school project. You can put 20 quality hours into a project that should only take 1, only to have it still come out looking like crap if you don't have the skills you need.
write-up: President Bush pushed a hard line Wednesday on trying terror suspects through military tribunals, exhorting Congress to allow evidence to be withheld from a defendant if necessary to protect classified information.
It sounds almost fair... until you think back and recall that this president has claimed the right to classify and declassify everything pretty much at will, and has been reclassifying documents that were exposed long ago.
Therefore, practically anything can be turned into a secret, and therefore everything can eventually be withheld from defendants.
What a sweet, sweet racket he's got going!
The are trying to equate evidence against a person with methods of obtaining that evidence.
I do not see the equivilence. As long as the courts can rule on the legality of how the evidence was obtained . Then the defendant should be able to reute the evidence but he has no right to know the procedure used to obtain it.
I wonder were they are being transfered from.
Room 101
I've heard some detainees are from New Hampshire. The GOP is concerned about grumbling in the "Live Free or Die" state.
This is news? The Europeans told that a month ago. My question: Has he acknowledged the 600 FEMA run prisons?
News is that he's claiming that these "special programs" of torture work.
Today's 'patriot' is tomorrow's 'insurgent'. What list will you be on when FEMA gets the trains rolling?
I remember a time when if you mentioned these secret prisons to people they would call you a crazy left wing conspiracy nut. Oh well, one more defense of Bush and his buddies down.
is it me or has this story changed over time?
It's not just you, I'm afraid. As of this (#8.x) posting, it had changed twice since my #2 posting above. That posting contains the first paragraph from the story then, when it was about withholding classified evidence from terror suspects' trials.
I submitted a bug report. I do wish it would stop; it's so tiring being cynical at a moving target.
It's not a bug -- AP does that with its feeds. It issues updates and whatnot throughout the day.
I wish I could share your understanding. It's jarring, writing a response to one article and then coming back later and finding it's no longer appropriate.
From the poster's perspective, it walks like a bug, it quacks like a bug, it makes love to...
...wait. It's making love to a duck. That can't be right...
it is just hard to comment on a changing story especially when it changes so much, you comment now looks ignorant or that you didnt read the article.. I guess it would be nice if they would let us know if it is the final draft.
The way to avoid that totally is seed it yourself and then you have a fixed target. Here, there's a fitting irony to the President's secret torture prison story endlessly being revised. .
AP rewriting their stories sounds a bit like what Winston Smith did for a living ...
"the questioning of these detainees has provided critical intelligence information about terrorist activities that has enabled officials to prevent attacks, including with airplanes, within the United States. Other attacks thwarted through intelligence gathered in the program include a planned strike with an explosives-laden water tanker on U.S. Marines at Camp Lemonier in Djibouti, an attack with car and motorcycle bombs on the U.S. consulate in Karachi, and a plot to fly passenger planes into London's Heathrow Airport or Canary Wharf, Bush said."
Since the programs have been successful and since they are now being stopped why isn't anyone asking what is being done to ensure our safety in the future?
It has been reported that torture yielded valuable information. You may want to see the follow up on the other terrorist cells "busted" here in America and heralded as successes in the War on Terror.
Please, do yourself a favor and follow Pamela's link. I remember those cases, but I don't remember there being much fanfare when the various charges were dropped.
How has the secert part added to their effectiveness? Torture?
Bush keeps saying there is no torture so why the big secret?
Great point, Mr. Czar. My question is what is the fallout now that Bush admitted these "secret" prisons exist? He wants justice to come to the terrorists, but what's taken so long? Have we gathered any information that will help us capture Osama Bin Laden? I agree that we need to ask what is being done to ensure our future, but I wonder if this administration even has the answers.
Are you suggesting we exterminate the terrorists right away??!!! Jeez man - hold them for a while. Let them realize they are not going back to their little spider holes and see if they decide to give any information. From the sounds of it - they gave up information that we were able to use. I dont' understand why they are going to Gitmo now... perhaps they need some sun.
1) You assume they have been successful based on the Administration's version of things. They wanted to take credit for the work of the British, too. Haven't you learned yet, nay, haven't WE ALL learned yet, that these people can't be trusted to tell the truth? They attempt to finesse everything - and the cracks are showing.
2) "What is being done to ensure our safety in the future?" - is a question we should be asking all the time and HOW it is being done as well. Where is our Congressional oversight?
3) It is not Un-American to question these things, in fact it has traditionally been considered very American to inquire as to the facts, despite the numerous attempts of this President to imply that it helps our enemies.
4) In reality, this Administration has reacted in many ways just as Bin Laden anticipated. Doing so plays right into the hands of our enemies by becoming exactly what they accuse us of being with glossy, full color examples.
5) As the chickens come home to roost, it appears apologies, sweeping opposition party victories or impeachment are in order.
4) In reality, this Administration has reacted in many ways just as Bin Laden anticipated.
Not that you know what BL anticipated I hope..:)
Given that this has been widely suspected for some time, it is interesting that Bush is just now admitting the existence of this program. More interesting is that he claims that there is no torture involved in the process. With Guantanamo interrogators already pushing the boundaries of interrogation techniques, why does the CIA need to secretly transfer accused terrorists to other locations, if not to torture them?
Actually what is even better is that the President is confirming the existence of prisons members of Congress said couldn't be confirmed or denied with out threatening national security.
This is just more political hay to try and keep the Republicans in charge of both houses of Congress.
Dog the Wag.
Does it occur to anyone that this can be an election-time ruse to portray Republicans as doing anything possible to protect the country? Isn't it convenient that he admits something that's been suspected for quite a while now when elections are two months away and all polls show them as losing Congress? It seems to me like another election year stunt to shore up waning support.
Tundestar this was the absolute first thing that crossed my mind when i read this headline. I am anxious to see how this gets spun and twisted. I'm sure those of us with rational thought processes will be astounded how some people will absorb (or reflect) this info.
How does it help him to say; "We have been torturing people in secret prisons", as all this seams to indicate?
Oluseye... There are people in the US that WANT to hear that we've been "kept safe" by Bush's decision to extradite and torture anyone he calls a terrorist. My personal opinion is that our kidnapping and torture are making this country, and all our allies, considerably less safe.
He is saying this for political gain and to stroke the fears of some Americans... that they will then think "Hey, there are people in the world out to wipe out the US... thank god GW was protecting me with kidnapping and torture to get good intelligence!!"
Bush's problem is that he's lost Democrats, Moderates and independents. This doesn't help him with those groups. They're trying to exercise their base but that might not be enough.
Bush's problem is that he's lost Democrats, Moderates and independents. This doesn't help him with those groups. They're trying to exercise their base but that might not be enough
Somehow I doubt Bush has any hope of reaching out to Democrats or even Moderates. That's like asking for a miracle to change their minds about him at this point in time. In reality, he probably doesn't need to, he just has to get the conservative traditional Republican base riled up and excited enough to turn out and cast votes his party's way. I can see red-meat issues such as " gay marriage " and abortion being brought back into debate to get Republicans riled up.
So Bush is at it again, no we don't have secret prisons. Iraq has WMD's hmm growing trend, well at least it is for those of us with as rdaugherty said "rational thought processes"
From this day forward, all US troops will be required to read any captured terrorists their Miranda rights, or else have the ACLU set them free to kill and bomb more later...
Can't...stop. Must...not...feed...the trolls!
Oh the humanity! Giving other human beings due process to prove they are guilty of what we claim, rather than locking up and torturing innocent civilians! When will the madness end?!
What kind of awful organization would actually dare to stand up for Americans' Civil Liberties?! And they're a Union no less!
phew
Not that the ACLU or the Miranda rights have anything to do with this issue...but still...
Is it just me or secrets are no longer secrets during election season? Hmmm. How convenient. History repeats itself it seems.
Its funny to me that when the NY Times spoke out about this they were "traitors" and harming national security. But if the President and the Republicans say it, its a "good" thing.
I'm so sick of this fear everything mantra. Its time we get some REAL leadership in our government that actually "govern". Not scare everyone into voting for them. The same old song and dance is getting old.
Now if I were the head of a country; say somewhere in Eastern Europe, and I'd let the CIA use my country retreat as a torture house, and whilst so doing I had been denying it to the people who'd voted me into power, then I'd be pretty annoyed that the person I was doing it for had let the cat out of the bag. Other suppliers of torture chambers beware!
How does it help him to say; "We have been torturing people in secret prisons", as all this seams to indicate?
Believe it or not, the FOX Network, right-wing radio, right-wing blog and websites will spin Bush's declaration painting him as a President willing and able to do the extraordinary to protect Americans. It's called "Spin", something Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh and even Karl Rove get paid millions to do.
just imagine one american was held in just one secret prison anywhere. Then you might begin to understand why non americans are so upset.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |