Google Snatches Up YouTube for $1.65B
YouTube cofounders Chad Hurley, 29, left, and Steven Chen, 27, pose for a photo with their laptops at their office loft in a San Mateo, Calif. file photo from March 29, 2006. Internet search leader Google Inc. is in talks to acquire the popular online video site YouTube Inc. for about $1.6 billion, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday, citing a person familiar with the matter. (AP Photo/Tony Avelar, File)
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (36)
Interesting, and I don't know if this would be a bad or a good thing. Google Video tends to have a little less variety, because they're more strict about certain aspects of video content. On the other hand, Google has tended to foster the right kind of innovation recently. We'll see, I suppose.
- 2 votes
This is fantastic news for all involved with YouTube. Young entrepreneurs dream of this kind of acquisition, and to see it happen in less than two years is unheard of.
- 5 votes
let's not forget about MYSPACE, started in july 2003, bought by rupert murdoch and NEWSCORP in july 2005 for $580 million.
thank god for that. woopee.
- 3 votes
I stand corrected, I should have used the words 'very rare' instead of 'unheard of.' Thanks to you both.
- 3 votes
You're right: I don't think this acquisition would be about the underlying technology as much as Youtube's userbase and content. It's just Flash videos decorated with user accounts, tags and comments, after all, and it's been duplicated a few times over, already.
But, combine Youtube's userbase with Google's contextual search for ads along with Google's thoroughput, and there's some additional revenue and a primo media property there that may serve as the future alternative to network TV.
- 2 votes
This blows my mind:
Selling to Mountain View-based Google (for 1.6 BILLION) will give YouTube more technological muscle and generate a staggering windfall for a 67-employee company that was running on credit card debt just 20 months ago.
- 3 votes
If you can't beat 'em, buy 'em.
- 2 votes
I think this was less about beating them and more about grabbing the YouTube userbase before Yahoo! or MSN bought them. Google is already ahead of Yahoo! and MSN in video and taking YouTube off the market makes it very difficult for Yahoo! or MSN to catch up. The best defense is a good offense.
- 13 votes
If a company is to buy YouTube, Google should be it. Best to have a company who does not re-brand things to its own (Blogger comes to mind) and has a "do no evil" clause in it's charter.
YouTube has become the primary altenative video option outside the mainstreem. We need to keep it that way.
Google Press release:
~n
- 8 votes
Like that big bad Yahoo! has done with delicious, flickr, upcoming...
Like that big bad eBay has a habit of doing with Skype, Paypal...
To me this is a non-concern. The only possible concern I see would be one specific to Google as they already have a competing video product, but you can look at something like Yahoo! Photos and Flickr coexisting to downplay that issue as well
- 6 votes
Great news! Excellent news! I believe the pairing of YouTube and Google was the right move. Now, we can look forward to some great integration between both properties. YouTube now has the financial muscle (and protection) to move into new territory.
Excellent move!
- 2 votes
Conference call is happening now -- http://investor.google.com/webcast.html
Hetep and Respect, Good news - This is a good match, most of us who have channels think this is a match made in heaven. Many folks have put in some work in building their channels. There are some really interesting resources at the tube. Now there is some protection, that is a good thing. God is back in his heaven and the future looks bright.
If you have some free microseconds stop by and visit my channel.
http://www.youtube.com/aunk123
1.6 billions for two founders and 67 employees. Quite a few people are going to become millionaires. Good job guys!
- 1 vote
I'll bet you anything this get integrated with Google's advertising network (as in, video ads) within the next 6-18 months.
- 1 vote
Hetep and Respect good Vanadium, good point, you just provided my answer to monetizing YouTube. Yes Net 2.o's future looks bright.
The problem though, is that as soon as they start making money off of content that is copyrighted, they could be opening themselves up for big legal trouble.
There's a reason that sites like Google Video, and Google News don't have any advertising on them... Google knows it is in something of a gray area with these products as they rely entirely on content that Google doesn't own.
It'll be interesting seeing what they do to try turning this into a profitable business model. I actually ran the numbers for an internet-based video broadcaster for my last company a number of years ago... it simply didn't work on paper; advertising revenue was simply not sufficient to pay for the bandwidth that video requires.
Mind you, bandwidth is cheaper these days, and Google gets better clickthrough with their targetted advertising, so they might get it to work... but I predict they will have to clamp down on copyrighted content before they start trying to profit from it.
- 2 votes
I was just listening to the lastest TWIT and when this rumored purchase was brought up - John C. Dvorak made am extremely loud and somewhat less than convincing case for it being completely bogus. Personally, I am glad to see that he was wrong - although I prefer to use eyespot for video, I am happy to see this come together.
- 2 votes
Google is on the verge of ruling the internet. They have their hands in everything. I am glad they bought YouTube because Google Video sucked.
Ha. I love the headlines I'm seeing for the Google buy-out. "Gobbles" "Snaps Up" It's a monster!
- 1 vote
Google is very smart. I still don't understand how youtube (or google now) can make money at this. I imaging the bandwidth costs are OUTRAGEOUS. How can you make money with this business model? Just wondering.
As good a time as any to bring up EPIC 2014. I'd say we're on track, 'course by then it will be Googlatubazonivinebay.
- 1 vote
As good a time as any to bring up EPIC 2014. I'd say we're on track, 'course by then it will be Googlatubazonivinebay.
That video always makes me shiver. I don't know why, I actually think it's really good. Maybe it's that guy's voice. But yeah, we do seem to be mostly on track. ;-)
- 1 vote
The bell is ringing for those who are listening. We are still in a huge equity bubble where value has no reference ground.
When youTube had no $, it didn't make any sense [pun intended] for the copyright holders of all that copyrighted content they [youTube] distributes [illegally] to go after them ... as there was nothing to go after ... you sue, you win, you get nothing, meanwhile you spent a lot of money on lawyers.
Now that youTube has almost infinitely deep pockets [Google's pockets], there is tons 'o cash at the end of that litigation rainbow, so my bet is that copyright holders begin to sue Google to remove their copyrighted content.
The whole deal will probably still be worth it in the end, as not all copyright holders will sue, and not all youTube content is copyrighted, so, google will still have lots of videos, users, and cash when the dust settles... which is probably all that matters.
- 6 votes
Hetep and Respect Tom, If Google offers NewsVine 1.6 Billion dollars will you guys share? LOL
- 1 vote
Amazing considering they've only been around since Feb 2005.
- 2 votes
I find this very exciting, actually. I was beginning to wonder why Google hadn't done anything exciting in a while. :-)
This will give them the jump they need to pretty much rule online video. If they play their cards right, this could be a defining moment in Internet history.
- 1 vote
I wonder if this is good? While the most popular videos on Youtube remain user-made productions, the real pull behind Youtube is the sheer ease it presented in accessing videos. I would read about something, say the new Daily Show, and I could find it on Youtube. I can watch old Sam & Max episodes there too and old ads, etc. In fact, often when I find a video on another site, I can find the same one of Youtube and bookmark it. Even when Youtube stopped movies from being longer than 10 minutes, users found a way around it. This is why Youtube is so popular - it's the first major hub for online video that is easy to use, even on moderate bandwidth links.
It's also sadly the reason why it can't become profitable, because even though the most popular videos are not illegal, the bulk of the site's traffic is likely caused by copyright infringement. Google and otjher video services just can't compete because they can't get that dirty. I think there's a pretty good chance that Youtube will start seeing defections to other services such as Dailymotion. Just because the web has learned the lessons from the dot com boom doesn't mean major startups are suddenly better geared to make money.
I like Youtube because it has EVERYTHING. But unless a high profile company like Google wants to up its lawyers' retainer fees, the illegal activity will have to be curbed. It's the same problem that hit the P2P networks who tried to go legit.
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |


