Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Google Snatches Up YouTube for $1.65B

Mon Oct 9, 2006 2:31 PM EDT
business, technology, google, youtube
Michael Liedtke, AP Technology Writer
Standard and Poor's Internet equities analyst Scott Kessler says the merger is not such good news for other companies, such as Yahoo, which have had problems recently.
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>YouTube cofounders Chad Hurley, 29, left, and Steven Chen, 27, pose for a photo with their laptops at their office loft in a San Mateo, Calif. file photo from March 29, 2006. Internet search leader Google Inc. is in talks to acquire the popular online video site YouTube Inc. for about $1.6 billion, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday, citing a person familiar with the matter. (AP Photo/Tony Avelar, File)</p>

YouTube cofounders Chad Hurley, 29, left, and Steven Chen, 27, pose for a photo with their laptops at their office loft in a San Mateo, Calif. file photo from March 29, 2006. Internet search leader Google Inc. is in talks to acquire the popular online video site YouTube Inc. for about $1.6 billion, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday, citing a person familiar with the matter. (AP Photo/Tony Avelar, File)

Advertise | AdChoices
This article is over 14 days old and has been removed by requirement of the Associated Press.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Michael Liedtke's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Chad , San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose
  • Public Discussion (36)
Thorne N. Melcher

Interesting, and I don't know if this would be a bad or a good thing. Google Video tends to have a little less variety, because they're more strict about certain aspects of video content. On the other hand, Google has tended to foster the right kind of innovation recently. We'll see, I suppose.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 2:44 PM EDT
Daniel David

This is fantastic news for all involved with YouTube. Young entrepreneurs dream of this kind of acquisition, and to see it happen in less than two years is unheard of.

  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 3:09 PM EDT
SamKellett

Uh... Flickr?

  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 5:47 PM EDT
LaeF1

let's not forget about MYSPACE, started in july 2003, bought by rupert murdoch and NEWSCORP in july 2005 for $580 million.
thank god for that. woopee.

  • 3 votes
#2.2 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 7:14 PM EDT
Daniel David

I stand corrected, I should have used the words 'very rare' instead of 'unheard of.' Thanks to you both.

  • 3 votes
#2.3 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 9:55 PM EDT
Reply
rhodezone

You're right: I don't think this acquisition would be about the underlying technology as much as Youtube's userbase and content. It's just Flash videos decorated with user accounts, tags and comments, after all, and it's been duplicated a few times over, already.

But, combine Youtube's userbase with Google's contextual search for ads along with Google's thoroughput, and there's some additional revenue and a primo media property there that may serve as the future alternative to network TV.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 3:20 PM EDT
Pete ZaHutt

This blows my mind:

Selling to Mountain View-based Google (for 1.6 BILLION) will give YouTube more technological muscle and generate a staggering windfall for a 67-employee company that was running on credit card debt just 20 months ago.

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 3:27 PM EDT
Jeremy Tymes

If you can't beat 'em, buy 'em.

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 3:55 PM EDT
someone

I think this was less about beating them and more about grabbing the YouTube userbase before Yahoo! or MSN bought them. Google is already ahead of Yahoo! and MSN in video and taking YouTube off the market makes it very difficult for Yahoo! or MSN to catch up. The best defense is a good offense.

  • 13 votes
#5.1 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 4:36 PM EDT
Reply
nborders

If a company is to buy YouTube, Google should be it. Best to have a company who does not re-brand things to its own (Blogger comes to mind) and has a "do no evil" clause in it's charter.

YouTube has become the primary altenative video option outside the mainstreem. We need to keep it that way.

Google Press release:

~n

  • 8 votes
Reply#6 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 4:40 PM EDT
Ronald Lewis

Excellent points!

    #6.1 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 4:52 PM EDT
    Chris Casciano

    Like that big bad Yahoo! has done with delicious, flickr, upcoming...

    Like that big bad eBay has a habit of doing with Skype, Paypal...

    To me this is a non-concern. The only possible concern I see would be one specific to Google as they already have a competing video product, but you can look at something like Yahoo! Photos and Flickr coexisting to downplay that issue as well

    • 6 votes
    #6.2 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 5:12 PM EDT
    Reply
    Ronald Lewis

    Great news! Excellent news! I believe the pairing of YouTube and Google was the right move. Now, we can look forward to some great integration between both properties. YouTube now has the financial muscle (and protection) to move into new territory.

    Excellent move!

    • 2 votes
    Reply#7 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 4:41 PM EDT
    Ronald Lewis

    Conference call is happening now -- http://investor.google.com/webcast.html

      #7.1 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 4:50 PM EDT
      Reply
      Aunk (The Cultural Health Guy)

      Hetep and Respect, Good news - This is a good match, most of us who have channels think this is a match made in heaven. Many folks have put in some work in building their channels. There are some really interesting resources at the tube. Now there is some protection, that is a good thing. God is back in his heaven and the future looks bright.

      If you have some free microseconds stop by and visit my channel.
      http://www.youtube.com/aunk123

        Reply#8 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 4:59 PM EDT
        lll

        1.6 billions for two founders and 67 employees. Quite a few people are going to become millionaires. Good job guys!

        • 1 vote
        Reply#9 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 5:39 PM EDT
        Vanadium

        I'll bet you anything this get integrated with Google's advertising network (as in, video ads) within the next 6-18 months.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#10 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 5:47 PM EDT
        Aunk (The Cultural Health Guy)

        Hetep and Respect good Vanadium, good point, you just provided my answer to monetizing YouTube. Yes Net 2.o's future looks bright.

          #10.1 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 11:27 PM EDT
          Morwynd

          The problem though, is that as soon as they start making money off of content that is copyrighted, they could be opening themselves up for big legal trouble.

          There's a reason that sites like Google Video, and Google News don't have any advertising on them... Google knows it is in something of a gray area with these products as they rely entirely on content that Google doesn't own.

          It'll be interesting seeing what they do to try turning this into a profitable business model. I actually ran the numbers for an internet-based video broadcaster for my last company a number of years ago... it simply didn't work on paper; advertising revenue was simply not sufficient to pay for the bandwidth that video requires.

          Mind you, bandwidth is cheaper these days, and Google gets better clickthrough with their targetted advertising, so they might get it to work... but I predict they will have to clamp down on copyrighted content before they start trying to profit from it.

          • 2 votes
          #10.2 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:53 PM EDT
          Reply
          merrydeath

          I was just listening to the lastest TWIT and when this rumored purchase was brought up - John C. Dvorak made am extremely loud and somewhat less than convincing case for it being completely bogus. Personally, I am glad to see that he was wrong - although I prefer to use eyespot for video, I am happy to see this come together.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#11 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 6:14 PM EDT
          Craig Aron

          Google is on the verge of ruling the internet. They have their hands in everything. I am glad they bought YouTube because Google Video sucked.

            Reply#12 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 6:19 PM EDT
            Metric

            Ha. I love the headlines I'm seeing for the Google buy-out. "Gobbles" "Snaps Up" It's a monster!

            • 1 vote
            Reply#13 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 7:38 PM EDT
            _Von_

            Google is very smart. I still don't understand how youtube (or google now) can make money at this. I imaging the bandwidth costs are OUTRAGEOUS. How can you make money with this business model? Just wondering.

              Reply#14 - Mon Oct 9, 2006 8:11 PM EDT
              Noah BradleyDeleted
              France

              As good a time as any to bring up EPIC 2014. I'd say we're on track, 'course by then it will be Googlatubazonivinebay.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#16 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:33 AM EDT
              Ryan Joseph

              As good a time as any to bring up EPIC 2014. I'd say we're on track, 'course by then it will be Googlatubazonivinebay.

              That video always makes me shiver. I don't know why, I actually think it's really good. Maybe it's that guy's voice. But yeah, we do seem to be mostly on track. ;-)

              • 1 vote
              #16.1 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:06 PM EDT
              Reply
              Damascus

              Early retirement anyone?

              • 1 vote
              Reply#17 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:52 AM EDT
              Able Ape

              The bell is ringing for those who are listening. We are still in a huge equity bubble where value has no reference ground.

                Reply#18 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:24 AM EDT
                Leftist

                My name is humpty. Allow me to bumpty. My mind's on the matter 'cuz my matter's on the mind.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#19 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:42 AM EDT
                Aunk (The Cultural Health Guy)

                Hetep and Respect leftist, U funny, stay on the wall cuz.

                P.S. What does your name mean?

                  #19.1 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:36 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  tom

                  When youTube had no $, it didn't make any sense [pun intended] for the copyright holders of all that copyrighted content they [youTube] distributes [illegally] to go after them ... as there was nothing to go after ... you sue, you win, you get nothing, meanwhile you spent a lot of money on lawyers.

                  Now that youTube has almost infinitely deep pockets [Google's pockets], there is tons 'o cash at the end of that litigation rainbow, so my bet is that copyright holders begin to sue Google to remove their copyrighted content.

                  The whole deal will probably still be worth it in the end, as not all copyright holders will sue, and not all youTube content is copyrighted, so, google will still have lots of videos, users, and cash when the dust settles... which is probably all that matters.

                  • 6 votes
                  Reply#20 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:33 PM EDT
                  Aunk (The Cultural Health Guy)

                  Hetep and Respect Tom, If Google offers NewsVine 1.6 Billion dollars will you guys share? LOL

                  • 1 vote
                  #20.1 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:40 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  bnaze13

                  Amazing considering they've only been around since Feb 2005.

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#21 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:52 PM EDT
                  Ryan Joseph

                  I find this very exciting, actually. I was beginning to wonder why Google hadn't done anything exciting in a while. :-)

                  This will give them the jump they need to pretty much rule online video. If they play their cards right, this could be a defining moment in Internet history.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#22 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:05 PM EDT
                  bnaze13

                  i wonder what google's longterm goal is for all of this.

                    Reply#23 - Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:42 PM EDT
                    Gabbahead

                    I wonder if this is good? While the most popular videos on Youtube remain user-made productions, the real pull behind Youtube is the sheer ease it presented in accessing videos. I would read about something, say the new Daily Show, and I could find it on Youtube. I can watch old Sam & Max episodes there too and old ads, etc. In fact, often when I find a video on another site, I can find the same one of Youtube and bookmark it. Even when Youtube stopped movies from being longer than 10 minutes, users found a way around it. This is why Youtube is so popular - it's the first major hub for online video that is easy to use, even on moderate bandwidth links.

                    It's also sadly the reason why it can't become profitable, because even though the most popular videos are not illegal, the bulk of the site's traffic is likely caused by copyright infringement. Google and otjher video services just can't compete because they can't get that dirty. I think there's a pretty good chance that Youtube will start seeing defections to other services such as Dailymotion. Just because the web has learned the lessons from the dot com boom doesn't mean major startups are suddenly better geared to make money.

                    I like Youtube because it has EVERYTHING. But unless a high profile company like Google wants to up its lawyers' retainer fees, the illegal activity will have to be curbed. It's the same problem that hit the P2P networks who tried to go legit.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#24 - Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:31 AM EDT
                    Leave a Comment:
                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                    Newsvine Privacy Statement
                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                    FUN STUFF:
                    • Leaderboard |
                    • E-Mail Alerts |
                    • Top of the Vine |
                    • Newsvine Live |
                    • Newsvine Archives |
                    • The Greenhouse |
                    COMPANY STUFF:
                    • Code of Honor |
                    • Company Info |
                    • Contact Us |
                    • Jobs |
                    • User Agreement |
                    • Privacy Policy |
                    • About our ads
                    LEGAL STUFF:
                    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com