Scientists to Vie for $25M Climate Prize

advertisement
This article is over 14 days old and has been removed by requirement of the Associated Press.
  • 16 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
5.3
3.1
1.4
{"commentId":521054,"authorDomain":"leftist"}

heroes!

{"commentId":521054,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"leftist"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 7:51 AM EST
{"commentId":521094,"authorDomain":"eyes"}

Wow. This is huge. Obviously, some scientists are going to do this just for the money, most maybe, and I just hope it doesn't turn some scientists against each other.

{"commentId":521094,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"eyes"}
    Reply#2 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 8:28 AM EST
    {"commentId":521112,"authorDomain":"flymulla"}

    And he looks happy givving the money.

    {"commentId":521112,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"flymulla"}
      Reply#3 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 8:39 AM EST
      {"commentId":521114,"authorDomain":"flymulla"}

      This gentleman like James Bond knows the trick. It also advertises Virgin

      {"commentId":521114,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"flymulla"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#4 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 8:40 AM EST
      {"commentId":521166,"authorDomain":"chill888"}

      He is a fascinating guy. Hopefully his philanthropy will note only lead to some breakthroughs but also motivate others to create similar challenges

      {"commentId":521166,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"chill888"}
      • 4 votes
      Reply#5 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 9:17 AM EST
      {"commentId":521173,"authorDomain":"jacobcarbonero"}

      It is one stone to take out two birds...great marketing tool for Virigin as pointed out by Firozali but obviously it is great (if a solution is found) for our future generations! Cheers and good luck.
      But we must remember that this will only work if we all pull together unlike the Kyoto Treaty.

      {"commentId":521173,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"jacobcarbonero"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#6 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 9:25 AM EST
      {"commentId":521255,"authorDomain":"kasey"}

      I have an idea...plant trees. Don't they use CO2?

      {"commentId":521255,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"kasey"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#7 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 10:06 AM EST
      {"commentId":521283,"authorDomain":"territan"}

      Yes, but they don't use them in the quantities that are being released into the atmosphere.

      They also tend to have a deleterious effect on industry and property values; in order to build an apartment complex, office building, or a McMansion, one must clear away the "vegetable vermin" first.

      {"commentId":521283,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"territan"}
      • 2 votes
      #7.1 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 10:19 AM EST
      {"commentId":521507,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}

      Actually, too many trees is bad because the methane they produce has 20X the warming effect of CO2. Obviously trees are wonderful in lots of other ways but if you're only thinking about global warming they aren't the answer. Branson has the best answer and he's putting up money to do it.

      {"commentId":521507,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
      • 2 votes
      #7.2 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 12:00 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":521288,"authorDomain":"territan"}

      Up next, a $50 Million prize to the scientist who can definitively debunk all of this talk about global warming and greenhouse gases.

      Sponsored by ExxonMobil, of course, and the cream of the jest is at the end of the year they can put it on the balance sheet as "research into climate change." Brilliant!

      {"commentId":521288,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"territan"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#8 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 10:21 AM EST
      {"commentId":521342,"authorDomain":"RobieB"}

      I just watched a Discovery channel special on the Big Freeze. It is just as predictable that temps can drop 10 to 20 degrees in one year. It is also possible that Global warming will allow the partial melting of fresh water ice which would flood the ocean and stop the warm water conveyor belt from the equator. It is also possible that an meteor will hit us and end the speculation. A large volcanic eruption would drop world wide temps causing crops to fail etc. All of these things are possible and even probable. What can we do about it? Not much really just keep throwing money into basic research and try not to be so dependent on the weather.

      {"commentId":521342,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"RobieB"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#9 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 10:45 AM EST
      {"commentId":521503,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}

      Branson is a brilliant PR guy. The $25 million is both a tax writeoff and he gets to keep the resulting technology. BP just put up $500 million for research and won't get anywhere near the press Branson will get.

      Even better, he's not talking about cutting back or penalizing people or making any country suffer like the politico in the photo op, he's talking about fixing the problem scientificially, which is what scientists said all along.

      It's win-win. Good job, Mr. Branson.

      {"commentId":521503,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#10 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 11:59 AM EST
      {"commentId":521804,"authorDomain":"chumsuet"}

      As far as I can see every little bit we do will help. Branson is very good for having his finger on the pulse of public zeitgeist. Generally where he leads others follow.

      {"commentId":521804,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"chumsuet"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#11 - Fri Feb 9, 2007 2:38 PM EST
      {"commentId":642565,"authorDomain":"p-m-b"}

      Mechanical "PERPETUUM MOBILE" - BURANLO, not contradicting is invented
      To fundamental laws of physics, and the opening new physical law- « Transformation static нагруженности (springs, magnetic fields and others Springing materials) in dynamics{changes} of rotary movement on the basis of planetary
      Systems of tooth gearings. For the first time an energy source are not spontaneous
      Forces of the nature, and force of statically loaded spring acting on dividers of forces
      Infinitely in time. The engineering specifications under a heading « MECHANICAL
      Self-propelled - BURANLO (БУРАНЛО) » is to the address of:

      {"commentId":642565,"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998","authorDomain":"p-m-b"}
        Reply#12 - Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:53 AM EDT
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"75036","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"75036","contentId":"559998"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking