that was obviously a goal.
there has to be a point where adult human beings can make a decision within the spirit of a rule without allowing the literal phrasing of the rule to override what the rule means.
the puck completely crossed the line, and then, completely on the other side of the line, the goalie's pad covered the puck.
the ruling was like saying that you cant confirm your hand is under a desk just because you put it there and the desk happens to be obscuring your view of your hand.
fecking bull@!$%#. at least it wasnt an elimination game, altho it obviously could have changed the outcome of the game.
but the NHL is still the worst officiating system in american pro sports, and this is simply more proof.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |