Bill OKs Lowering Flags When Troops Die

advertisement
This article is over 14 days old and has been removed by requirement of the Associated Press.
  • 1 Vote
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.8
{"commentId":783689,"authorDomain":"juxtaposition"}

This is the stupidest thing I have seen in a long time. The flying of the flag at half mast is a sign of respect for the deceased. If it is illegal for a federal building to fail to lower their flag if ordered to by the govenor, then it becomes just another bit of lip service.

{"commentId":783689,"threadId":"114377","contentId":"783748","authorDomain":"juxtaposition"}
    Reply#1 - Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:38 AM EDT
    {"commentId":783797,"authorDomain":"eric-g"}

    I think you missed half of the point. The governor will not be able to order the flag to half mast for any purpose, just for the purpose of honoring a member of the armed forces from that state killed while on active duty, or, as you phrased it, as "a sign of respect for the deceased".

    {"commentId":783797,"threadId":"114377","contentId":"783748","authorDomain":"eric-g"}
      #1.1 - Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:13 AM EDT
      {"commentId":785965,"authorDomain":"juxtaposition"}

      No, I entirely realize that it would only be ordered to recognize members of the armed forces who have died in the line of duty, however if the flags are lowered because someone orders them to be lowered, then fewer people are actually reflecting on why the flag is lowered.

      I guess what I'm trying to convey is that by requiring this 'show of respect' the gesture means much less than if it is performed by choice.

      {"commentId":785965,"threadId":"114377","contentId":"783748","authorDomain":"juxtaposition"}
        #1.2 - Sat Jun 16, 2007 10:40 AM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":787687,"authorDomain":"CurtisLow"}

        Might as well lower the flag and cut off the top poll, because of the lives were losing in Bush"s war.
        very sad..

        {"commentId":787687,"threadId":"114377","contentId":"783748","authorDomain":"CurtisLow"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#2 - Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:41 AM EDT
        {"commentId":10403906,"authorDomain":"breelaboy"}
        breelaboyDeleted
        {"commentId":10421005,"authorDomain":"brianalampton"}
        brianalamptonDeleted
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"114377","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"114377","contentId":"783748"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking