Interesting article contrasting the two sides. I see that the producer for "Sicko" is mostly interested in slinging insults rather than a debate based on specifics, while Huckabee is taking a much needed stand against socialized medicine which has proved to do weaken access to health care than to provide choice and excellence as in the present system.
It is true that there needs to be a change to health care in America, but not with socialized programs like Canada and Great Britain. Many examples have shown that creating government control of health care creates more problems than it is worth.
"since he's raised just about no money and sparked zero interest since jumping into the race"
I guess (and am not surprised) Ms. O'Hara doesn't follow the news often. Former Governor Huckabee won the Iowa GOP debate earlier this month and gained much more exposure and support since then. Unlike his other GOP counterparts, Huckabee clearly has the country's best interest at heart and isn't in the race simply to become president. Any kind of research (which again, Ms. O'Hara clearly doesn't do) would show that Mike Huckabee became a very successful Republican governor in a very Democratic Arkansas, and held the office for 10 years.
And besides, I don't think anyone associated with Michael Moore knows anything about truth, so why would anyone bother listening to any of those un-American idiots?? If France is so great, pack your bags.
"since he's raised just about no money and sparked zero interest since jumping into the race"
You see, this is just like a Moore supporter, to make a statement that is in no way backed up by facts, and when they're confronted, all they can do is sling insults, rather than argue their point coherently. Why are these people given any airtime? Jeez, a retarded monkey could argue his beliefs better than they can!
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |