Bush Calls for Expansion of Spy Law

advertisement
This article is over 14 days old and has been removed by requirement of the Associated Press.
  • 22 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
8.7
2.9
{"commentId":1035545,"authorDomain":"lele"}

Trying to leave a legacy?

{"commentId":1035545,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"lele"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:44 PM EDT
{"commentId":1035665,"authorDomain":"b-shaughnessy"}

Uh, no George. You shouldn't spy on political enemies just because they're political enemies.

{"commentId":1035665,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"b-shaughnessy"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:24 PM EDT
{"commentId":1035920,"authorDomain":"eSantiago"}

You know... I'm not one for propagandist nonsense, but I know for a fact that office used to be known as the "National Operations Center". I wonder why they changed the name? It seems more... uh, scary now.

{"commentId":1035920,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"eSantiago"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:35 PM EDT
{"commentId":1035931,"authorDomain":"eSantiago"}

My mistake, it was the NSOC, which was National Security Operations Center. Threat seems still more scary.

{"commentId":1035931,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"eSantiago"}
  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:38 PM EDT
{"commentId":1035976,"authorDomain":"agio"}

Well I guess they need a new name to uphold the "Protect America Act." /eyeroll

{"commentId":1035976,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"agio"}
  • 1 vote
#3.2 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:52 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1035970,"authorDomain":"niteqwill"}

Wow, amazing. I'm actually not surprised.

{"commentId":1035970,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"niteqwill"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:49 PM EDT
{"commentId":1036006,"authorDomain":"partisanhack"}

If you look carefully at the photo you can see Cheney's hand going up Bush's back to work the levers on his mouth...

{"commentId":1036006,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"partisanhack"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:03 PM EDT
{"commentId":1036314,"authorDomain":"tma"}

It figures. I've been wondering who has been "emboldening" George to say these things. He certainly isn't bashful about wanting to be Big Brother.

{"commentId":1036314,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"tma"}
  • 1 vote
#5.1 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:01 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1036028,"authorDomain":"paine"}

This proposal is repugnant to civil liberties, like so many others of this administration's policies. The Bush administration has placed us in the same position as the proverbial toad in boiling water. Place the toad in lukewarm water, it won't complain. Increase the temperature in gradual increments, it won't notice. Get the water to the point where it's steaming, and the toad doesn't even realize that it's getting boiled to death.

{"commentId":1036028,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"paine"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#6 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:11 PM EDT
{"commentId":1036031,"authorDomain":"agio"}
grant retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies which may have helped the government conduct surveillance prior to January 2007 without a court order.

I think this really is what this is all about.

{"commentId":1036031,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"agio"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#7 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:12 PM EDT
{"commentId":1036053,"authorDomain":"eSantiago"}

Eh, don't go spoiling it.

{"commentId":1036053,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"eSantiago"}
  • 2 votes
#7.1 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:21 PM EDT
{"commentId":1036136,"authorDomain":"forsaken"}

That is certainly why they want to expand this and make it permanent, it's like a get of jail free card for stomping all over American citizen's rights. Privatization for all and little American flags for everyone else.

{"commentId":1036136,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"forsaken"}
  • 1 vote
#7.2 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:55 PM EDT
{"commentId":1036336,"authorDomain":"tma"}

As the Telco's got left to twist in the wind, they aren't "too happy" with what the security agencies have had them do. These California lawsuits aginst them should be interesting, since the judge doesn't seem to want to exclude evidence stamped "national security" by the administration.

{"commentId":1036336,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"tma"}
    #7.3 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:07 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1036513,"authorDomain":"agio"}

    That would be one hell of a big class action suit, btw. How many millions of people would have standing?

    {"commentId":1036513,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"agio"}
      #7.4 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:12 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1036711,"authorDomain":"tma"}

      Sorry, I'm not sure how many are represented. But I think it's 3 separate citizen coalition groups that have brought the suits on the major telco's. I read it in Time Online when the Dems passed the last bit of legislation, just before their summer break (whenthere was a big outcry of selling out). But the Dems are not going to give in on the retroactive immunity deal.

      {"commentId":1036711,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"tma"}
      • 1 vote
      #7.5 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:22 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1036129,"authorDomain":"celestina"}

      Avast! Thar tryin' to get th' ninjas th' upper hand! Th' want ter take away our most priceless treasure, an' they think we'll not notice it bein' stolen' out from under our noses. Tis time we showed 'em we don' fear, either thar foolish campfire tales or thar retribution. Fire at will!!

      {"commentId":1036129,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"celestina"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#8 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:52 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1036159,"authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}
      Bush Calls for Expansion of Spy Law

      Of course he does.

      {"commentId":1036159,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}
        Reply#9 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:05 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1036271,"authorDomain":"IndependentVoter"}

        Bush gets bashed for operating outside the law..now he gets flack for wanting operate within the law. Well, I guess that is why he gets paid the big bucks.

        {"commentId":1036271,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"IndependentVoter"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#10 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:45 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1036818,"authorDomain":"bluejohnnyd"}

        Well, you must admit, the law he is proposing working inside is technically illegal, so nothing much has changed.

        {"commentId":1036818,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"bluejohnnyd"}
        • 2 votes
        #10.1 - Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:57 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1038555,"authorDomain":"forsaken"}

        Robbery is illegal and there is no justifiable reason to change that, so why would there be any reason to change the law regarding the theft of privacy from American citizens. It just doesn't make sense. If you're really that afraid of the terrorists, then the Bush administration has you right where they want you.

        {"commentId":1038555,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"forsaken"}
        • 1 vote
        #10.2 - Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:43 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1038712,"authorDomain":"forsaken"}

        This is the same type of methodology that Louis Giuffrida, Oliver North and Bush Sr. pulled with the restructuring of FEMA to be used as an instrument of domestic anti-terrorism. These people equate political dissent with treason and they'll stop at nothing to continue eroding our rights until we are the mercy of a government that will not allow protests, demonstration or general dissent.

        During the Iran-Contra affair days, Bush Sr., Oliver North, John Poindexter and William Casey had actually used FEMA to enact an emergency contingency plan that suspended the American Constitution. In the current Bush administration we have many of the same players and a number of people who are the brain children of these players, who are struggling to retool the Constitution and thereby the way the Government is allowed to proceed in cases of political threat.

        These are disturbing times and we all should be vigilant and outspoken regarding these issues, so they don't fade away into a permeating secrecy that would allow our rights to be destroyed quietly from the inside.

        {"commentId":1038712,"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067","authorDomain":"forsaken"}
        • 2 votes
        #10.3 - Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:40 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"152209","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"152209","contentId":"972067"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking