Log In | Register
2 Comments
Printadvertisement
This article is over 14 days old and has been removed by requirement of the Associated Press.
8 Votes- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Published to:
- Associated Press's Column, All of Newsvine
- Groups: none
- Regions: United States , Washington DC
| Judge rules presidential records executive order goes too far | Ben Josephs | Thu Oct 4 | 8 | |
 | Court reverses Bush on archive secrecy | Reuters | Reuters | Tue Oct 2 | 2 |
- Public Discussion (3)
What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user
has on the current conversation.
The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd
row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera).
Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group
is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the
left, in their corresponding group.
Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the
number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative
one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their
relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":1069077,"authorDomain":"mrcoder"}
The tazer is soon to become the recommended option according to the New Jersey Attorney General for assuring policy compliance or obedience without necessarily using deadly force. The NJ AG is slated to issue a new advisory on the use of these weapons in or around January 2008.
"Spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore said the White House was reviewing the opinion and considering its options."
This may be just the same sort of disdain for obedience to policy that was demonstrated by the tazered student Meyers at the University of FL last week.
Tazer was the preferred tool for ensuring obedience with public policy in FL. Not that anyone knows what the policy was that he violated. Here it's perfectly clear what the policy is. The Supreme Court has spelled it out.
Is it not therefore best to again call in the tazers without delay to assist the white house to comply expeditously with the public policy?
Taser is the safer more humanitarian option.
{"commentId":1069077,"threadId":"156811","contentId":"996834","authorDomain":"mrcoder"}
#1 - Tue Oct 2, 2007 4:46 PM EDT{"commentId":1072479,"authorDomain":"mike-claassen"}
thank you sir. you are clearly wise to the real problem going on with the u.s. right now (I am canadian btw.) The US governement has far too much power and there has been an abuse of that especially recently with the Bush administration and its manipulatiion of facts in order to go to war with iraq, aswell as its gradual progression towards the complete removal of civil liberties (i.e. patriot act, etc.)
{"commentId":1072479,"threadId":"156811","contentId":"996834","authorDomain":"mike-claassen"}
#2 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 11:24 PM EDT{"canLink":false,"threadId":"156811","isPrivate":false}
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
Start Tracking
Stop TrackingCOMPANY STUFF:
LEGAL STUFF:
- © 2005-2009 Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine is a property of
