Ron Paul Raises $5 Million for Bid

advertisement

WASHINGTON — Long-shot Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul raised a surprising $5 million during the past three months, capitalizing on his stance as the only anti-war contender in the GOP field.

Paul, a Texas congressman who once ran for president as a Libertarian, also will report having $5.3 million cash on hand, campaign spokesman Jesse Benton said.

The amount places Paul well ahead of all but the Republican front-runners in the race. His fundraising for the quarter almost matches what Sen. John McCain is expected to report. His total is half the amount that former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is reported to have raised.

Paul barely registers in polls of Republican voters, a sign of low name recognition nationally. Since he entered the campaign, he has operated with little media attention, getting the spotlight only during debates. But that has been enough to attract an avid Internet following.

Benton said most of Paul's money has come from online contributions. He said the donations had placed a strain on the relatively small campaign staff, which was trying to keep up with the accounting challenge.

Meanwhile, Republican Mike Huckabee was expected to report raising about $1 million for the quarter, according to a Republican familiar with his fundraising. Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas, had been considered the most likely candidate to emerge from the back of the Republican field because of his charismatic appeal. But his fundraising has been far less than expected. His third-quarter total would bring his overall fundraising for the year to about $2.3 million.

Paul, meanwhile, turned some heads at midyear when he reported having $2.3 million cash on hand. Since then, Benton said, the campaign has increased its staffing from 10 to 40 employees. "We're adding employees as we speak," he said.

Paul has been in Congress for 10 years, but also served four terms in the 1970s and 1980s.

He stands out from the current Republican field because of his staunch anti-war stance. At a debate in August, he was asked how he would end the war. "Just come home," he said. "We just marched in. We can just come back. We went in there illegally. We did not declare war. It's lasting way too long. We didn't declare war in Korea or Vietnam. The wars were never really ended. We lose those wars. We're losing this one. We shouldn't be there. We ought to just come home."

He's an iconoclast in his party in other ways, as well. During a debate on issues confronting minorities, he was enthusiastically applauded when he said minorities are unfairly punished in the criminal justice system. And he called for an end to the war on drugs because "it isn't working."

Paul has raised more than $8 million so far this year.

"Here's a guy nobody is paying attention to and he's raising real money," said a stunned Tony Fabrizio, a Republican strategist unaffiliated in the presidential contest. Noting that McCain has emerged as the most vigorous supporter of the current war strategy in Iraq, Fabrizio said: "The strongest pro-war candidate and the strongest anti-war candidate raised the same amount of money.

  • 44 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
11
2.0
{"commentId":1071846,"authorDomain":"frustratedamerican"}

Man I hope he wins. In my opinion we need big change as a country and he's really the only guy not offering more of the same on many levels. Transitions can sometimes be tough but if the ideas that spark transitions are based on sound logic the majority of people will benefit. What we're doing now (over-borrowing, spending more than we earn, stretching our military resources) is unsustainable, it will collapse. In this case the logic is undeniable.

{"commentId":1071846,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"frustratedamerican"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 6:26 PM EDT
{"commentId":1072088,"authorDomain":"ultimategfx"}

Man, I really don't care any more. I hope he loses just because it'll shut Digg and the rest of the Internet up and make them realise that they're not the most important people in the world.

{"commentId":1072088,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"ultimategfx"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 8:02 PM EDT
{"commentId":1072127,"authorDomain":"Henryvii"}

Yeah, who needs a good government as long as people have low self esteem?

Get a life.

{"commentId":1072127,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"Henryvii"}
  • 8 votes
#2.1 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 8:18 PM EDT
{"commentId":1072165,"authorDomain":"ultimategfx"}

After months of waiting I'm still yet to see why he'll make a good president. All I see is an online community obsessed with spamming Ron Paul articles because he believes in the things they (and most kids) want, like drugs and no war.

Being British it means nothing to me whoever wins, earns loads of money, and wins a few polls. The furthest it'll come to me is the crap I'll have to read on the Internet in the next few years. I don't understand Internet Politics...

{"commentId":1072165,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"ultimategfx"}
  • 3 votes
#2.2 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 8:37 PM EDT
{"commentId":1072293,"authorDomain":"Henryvii"}

All I see is an online community obsessed with spamming Ron Paul articles because he believes in the things they (and most kids) want, like drugs and no war.

You only see it as spamming because you disagree with him. Further, you make it seem like people only want to vote for him because they're hippies. You couldn't be further from the truth. Paul's supporters back him up because we support freedom. While you British have accepted that the government will track your every move, there is a select group of Americans who oppose such a thing in America. We are against the war on drugs because we support freedom of choice and we hate that billions and billions of our dollars are going towards a racially biased criminal justice system (and that's just tho top of that issue). We are against the war because it was unjust and it's damn expensive. For the amount of money we as Americans have spent (I know that doesn't include you Brits), everyone in America could have had a top of the line computer. Everyone in Iraq could have bought a house for that kind of cash.

So, pardon me if I get a bit upset that you try to tear down a candidate you know nothing about simply because he has avid supporters. Again, get a life.

{"commentId":1072293,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"Henryvii"}
  • 6 votes
#2.3 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 9:47 PM EDT
{"commentId":1072355,"authorDomain":"ultimategfx"}

Firstly, I've reported the above comments. There is no need to get personal. If I wanted to get told to get a life repeatedly I'd argue with some of the kids on Digg.

I don't disagree with any of his points. In fact, freedom is an extremely important thing. Something I do dispute however is how much freedom most Americans feel that they are lacking. Could a lot of it stem from greed, or taking current freedoms for granted? Call me cynical, but I believe that if you are able to use public services like schools and the police, along with being able to live, sleep and eat in comfort then you're pretty free already. Sure, many see the War as a bad thing, and Bush has done some possibly awful things in the past. However, is it all truly down to him? Reginald D. Hunter, a fairly well-known comedian once said "It's the people behind Bush that are the problem. It's like some kid coming up to me with a hand-puppet and saying "out of my way darkie" and me saying "damn you puppet, I hate you!"

Personally, if I were American I may consider Ron Paul as a candidate. Sadly, British politics tend to be focused a lot more on policies, and much of the "Internet Politics" I find tend to be more of a side-show; something that perhaps might be why Bush was such a "@!$%#-up".

Ron Paul spamming does exist. Whilst I'm not going to hand-pick articles so close to my bed time I'll leave you with a Google search on Ron Paul Spammers. It's a known fact that Yahoo groups have been set up to spam Ron Paul articles on social networks like Digg. If you need more proof, use the Digg search feature, use the same parameters and you'll be sure to find some.

Sure, we British do live in a police state, but some of us don't mind that. Realistically, what bad can come of it? If I get mugged it may get picked up on CCTV and the culprit will be caught (something that actually happened during my youth). I have nothing to hide, so I don't care what is known about me.

{"commentId":1072355,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"ultimategfx"}
  • 1 vote
#2.4 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 10:17 PM EDT
{"commentId":1072370,"authorDomain":"adamkemp"}

Digg and most other social networking sites are nothing but spam. No one should take those seriously anyway.

{"commentId":1072370,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"adamkemp"}
  • 3 votes
#2.5 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 10:25 PM EDT
{"commentId":1072377,"authorDomain":"Henryvii"}

Everything is personal. Now, you simply have a completely incorrect view of freedom. Required funding of public schools is the opposite of freedom. It's stealing. Also, I never said it was all down to Bush. The fact of the matter is that only Paul will bring the troops out of Iraq and stop wasting our money. Really, we have no idea if Bush is the last stop - thanks to the secrecy surrounding the government. I see that as a bad thing - don't you?

You act as though the internet is less real or less important than your television or newspaper politics. If anything, the internet is more real because it is being written by people that aren't paid to say what they do - see Fox News and the BBC. They are paid to support the current governments and keep them in power. What you call spam, is merely adamant support. Voting for articles that you support isn't spam - it's activism.

The problem with the CCTV system is that, while the government may be just today, tomorrow it may not be so just. They may label you an enemy combatant, for example - and have you tortured because they think you have links to terrorism. Sure, you've got nothing to hide - but neither do most of the people in Guantanamo.

{"commentId":1072377,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"Henryvii"}
  • 5 votes
#2.6 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 10:29 PM EDT
{"commentId":1095940,"authorDomain":"jbromine"}

I must say, well said argument Henry VII. I am an American who supports Ron Paul. Our current system of government is subject to tyranny and secrecy if it is not practicing it already.

I am a patriot not because I cling to the very words of our government, or fly my flag when I'm supposed to, or wear "support our troops" shirts. No! These things do NOT make you a patriot. Granted, these things can be good, but they don't make you a patriot. A true patriot looks beyond these transparent acts, and finds the core of what it means to be an American. Instead, I am an ardent patriot because I cherish Liberty and a government as intended by our constitution and forefathers. As Ron Paul said [Paraphrased], "The Liberty message does not divide us, instead it can only bring us closer together."

{"commentId":1095940,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"jbromine"}
  • 5 votes
#2.7 - Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:04 AM EDT
{"commentId":1100428,"authorDomain":"YuriyBilokonsky"}
As Ron Paul said [Paraphrased], "The Liberty message does not divide us, instead it can only bring us closer together."

That really is it. Everyone wants to do what they want. There's just some people who don't want other people doing what they want. That's why not everyone is in support. That's why so many are.

{"commentId":1100428,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"YuriyBilokonsky"}
  • 1 vote
#2.8 - Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:35 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1072208,"authorDomain":"mcrutchfield"}

Man, Mike just gave me a great idea. We should get some frumpy queen, pay him a bunch of money, and then put up a couple of million closed-circuit cameras; we could be like the BRITISH! Brilliant.

{"commentId":1072208,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"mcrutchfield"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 9:06 PM EDT
{"commentId":1072917,"authorDomain":"YuriyBilokonsky"}

Cheerio! Tally ho! Pip pip!

{"commentId":1072917,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"YuriyBilokonsky"}
  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Thu Oct 4, 2007 8:25 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1072308,"authorDomain":"bmvaughn"}
The amount places Paul well ahead of all but the Republican front-runners in the race.

So you're saying he's still got no chance.

{"commentId":1072308,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"bmvaughn"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Oct 3, 2007 9:58 PM EDT
{"commentId":1072710,"authorDomain":"LiveFreeOrDie"}

Ron Paul's chances are still pretty slim, but by raising $5+ million that he can spend on advertising, he's now got quite a bit more chance than he had a few months ago. I suppose you could say he's merely managed to move himself to the front of the back of the pack.

He's still a long-shot compared to Giuliani and Thompson, who have money, name recognition, and press attention. But with this funding he's moving himself within range of McCain and Romney. While he lacks their name recognition, he now has nearly the same funding as them and he's starting to gather press recognition. Should be interesting.

Paul's funding numbers are likely to only get better. The fact that his average contribution amount was only $40 (the maximum annual contribution is $2300) means that he has a big pool of small contributors to whom he can go back for more money in subsequent quarters, if his campaign continues to gain momentum.

{"commentId":1072710,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"LiveFreeOrDie"}
  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Thu Oct 4, 2007 3:30 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1072743,"authorDomain":"petetoth"}

"Sure, we British do live in a police state, but some of us don't mind that."

How typical for the British! While getting tazered in the nuts and a baton shoved in the mouth, they have been heard to mutter "time for tea".

Shame on you!

Forget the queen, God save the British sheeple.

{"commentId":1072743,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"petetoth"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Thu Oct 4, 2007 4:15 AM EDT
{"commentId":1072920,"authorDomain":"YuriyBilokonsky"}

Well, I think the end of the revolution was a farce.

{"commentId":1072920,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"YuriyBilokonsky"}
    #5.1 - Thu Oct 4, 2007 8:27 AM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":1072744,"authorDomain":"petetoth"}

    At least in Myanmar they have to balls to protest.

    {"commentId":1072744,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"petetoth"}
      Reply#6 - Thu Oct 4, 2007 4:17 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1075619,"authorDomain":"m4nt15"}

      "Long-shot Republican presidential candidate"

      Why is he a long shot? He has a large group of supporters. The only reason people will think that he is a long-shot is because the media keeps hammering it into our minds.

      "His fundraising for the quarter ALMOST MATCHES what Sen. John McCain is EXPECTED to report."

      That's like saying that a team is going to lose a game if the opposing team does what we think they might. That's stupid. Money doesn't mean anything. 15 years ago people were only spending in the $10 million range. Now it's going up to triple digits! We are estimated to spend $218 BILLION next year in Iraq alone. Ron Paul would end that. I personally don't mind saving a few dollars here and there.

      {"commentId":1075619,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"m4nt15"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#7 - Fri Oct 5, 2007 10:40 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1077772,"authorDomain":"mayer-benjamin"}

      Every major 3rd party character of late has either fully supported Ron Paul by now, or have praised him a lot. I believe a lot people "spam" his name because they are desperate for freedom. America is the most free country in the world. The proof? It was the birthplace of the Libertarian Party, but We still have a ways to go.

      The politicians we poop out no longer believe in neither social freedom nor economic freedom on principle; its a shame. Hillary Clinton and Rudy Guiliani are exactly the same. They both are anti-peace, anti-freedom, anti-prosperity. Ron Paul is the opposite of Hillary and Rudy.

      {"commentId":1077772,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"mayer-benjamin"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#8 - Sat Oct 6, 2007 9:17 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1077952,"authorDomain":"Henryvii"}

      America is the most free country in the world.

      No it isn't. Not anymore.

      {"commentId":1077952,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"Henryvii"}
      • 3 votes
      #8.1 - Sat Oct 6, 2007 11:20 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1081830,"authorDomain":"petetoth"}

      And they dress the same!

      {"commentId":1081830,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"petetoth"}
      • 1 vote
      #8.2 - Mon Oct 8, 2007 8:51 AM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1086245,"authorDomain":"silentyuan"}

      RON PAUL 2008!!! Please register as republicans and vote for ron paul. he is the only real candidate on the GOP that has a chance against clinton. DONT SAY HE HAS NO CHANCE> dont be a defeatest. dont say its pointless to vote for him, because if you keep voting for what the establishment wants, then it will only get worse. dont just choose the lesser of 2 evils. vote for what is right. TAKE BACK THE COUNTRY. TAKE BACK YOUR RIGHT TO LIBERTY LIFE AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS> RESTORE THE REPUBLIC. RON PAUL 2008!! spread the message of freedom

      {"commentId":1086245,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"silentyuan"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#9 - Tue Oct 9, 2007 5:48 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1090003,"authorDomain":"mcrutchfield"}

      Cheers to that! Defeatism brings defeat. I don't know how many chances we're going to get...

      {"commentId":1090003,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"mcrutchfield"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#10 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:54 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1090085,"authorDomain":"jehawley"}

      SIGN THE PLEDGE!
      "I will pledge 20 dollars to Ron Paul for President 2008 but only if 500 people will do the same."

      {"commentId":1090085,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"jehawley"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#11 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:37 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1090239,"authorDomain":"YuriyBilokonsky"}

      write out the link but replace the periods with spaces.

      {"commentId":1090239,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"YuriyBilokonsky"}
      • 2 votes
      #11.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:19 AM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1109909,"authorDomain":"mamarcot"}

      Can't call it spam anymore people. Can't say he doesn't have a chance.

      Ron has placed first in 17 out of 36 of the straw polls to date, just about half.

      Sounds like some damn good chances to me!

      {"commentId":1109909,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"mamarcot"}
        Reply#12 - Thu Oct 18, 2007 12:23 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1110780,"authorDomain":"relmdweler"}

        November 5th as I am sure you all know is a large day to pledge $100 to Ron Paul's campaign. If this is news to you, you might want to check it out or consider it.

        {"commentId":1110780,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"relmdweler"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#13 - Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:32 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1111924,"authorDomain":"tomnovak"}

        Yawn Mike. The point of Ron Paul is that even if he has flaws, he has a Hell of a lot less than the other candidates. His name isn't being spammed - people are just desperate to get his word out there since the media seems to keep him out of the spotlight. If you want that to end simply because you don't want to see it, shame on you. You're British and subject to American politics on a world wide community, and it's only fair. Perhaps the American voters want to see it? And if you think American politics don't effect you, you're a pretty ignorant and foolish person.

        I support him mainly for the fact that he has ideas no one else has - he doesn't want to a different shade of grey policy wise, he wants a whole other spectrum of light, so to say. Ever hear of the America Union? I have, and I'm appalled that it even has a chance of coming to existence. You guys may be used to your semi-socialist states and your European Union over there, but I'm not ready for it here. Although I fully support CCTV cameras, because, like you, I have nothing to hide and the benefits outweigh the costs as long as government stays true, I find that something totally different. The point is, seeing a single government/economic system for North America is a scary prospect and would lead to disaster. We Americans haven't fully lost our spines yet, no matter what political correctness may lead you to believe.

        Your funniest statement yet must be this one: "All I see is an online community obsessed with spamming Ron Paul articles because he believes in the things they (and most kids) want..."
        Hahaha! God forbid someone support and cry out over a candidate they agree with! I suppose we should all just stop voting for those we find concordance with.

        {"commentId":1111924,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"tomnovak"}
          Reply#14 - Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:01 PM EDT
          {"commentId":1162204,"authorDomain":"jonasdominique"}

          Just to point out, Ron Paul is an alumnist of the largest living fraternity in the United States. If college students weren't voting before, then we may see their viewpoint in this elections results.

          Also I agree with the comment above, we don't know how many chances we're going to get. That is a powerful statement. I'm a republican, but I'm ready for a change.

          {"commentId":1162204,"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322","authorDomain":"jonasdominique"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#15 - Tue Nov 6, 2007 2:17 PM EST
          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"157630","isPrivate":false}
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          {"threadId":"157630","contentId":"1001322"}
          Start TrackingStart Tracking
          Stop TrackingStop Tracking