Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

70 Punished in Accidental B-52 Flight

Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:29 PM EDT
politics, nuclear, air-force, north-dakota, mistake
Pauline Jelinek, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 4 photos
<p>Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff Maj. Gen. Richard Newton III gestures during a news conference at the Pentagon, Friday, Oct. 19, 2007. In its first explicit confirmation that nuclear-armed missiles were erroneously flown from an air base in North Dakota to a base in Louisiana in late August, the Air Force on Friday called the episode an "unacceptable mistake" — of a sort that had never happened before. (AP Photo/Heesoon Yim)</p>

Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff Maj. Gen. Richard Newton III gestures during a news conference at the Pentagon, Friday, Oct. 19, 2007. In its first explicit confirmation that nuclear-armed missiles were erroneously flown from an air base in North Dakota to a base in Louisiana in late August, the Air Force on Friday called the episode an "unacceptable mistake" — of a sort that had never happened before. (AP Photo/Heesoon Yim)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The Air Force said Friday it would punish 70 airmen involved in the accidental, cross-country flight of a nuclear-armed B-52 bomber following an investigation that found widespread disregard for the rules on handling such munitions.

"There has been an erosion of adherence to weapons-handling standards at Minot Air Force Base and Barksdale Air Force Base," said Maj. Gen. Richard Newton, the Air Force deputy chief of staff for operations.

Newton was announcing the results of a six-week probe into the Aug. 29-30 incident in which the B-52 was inadvertently armed with six nuclear-tipped cruise missiles and flown from Minot in North Dakota to Barksdale in Louisiana without anyone noticing the mistake for more than a day.

The missiles were supposed to be taken to Louisiana, but the warheads were supposed to have been removed beforehand.

A main reason for the error was that crews had decided not to follow a complex schedule under which the status of the missiles is tracked while they are disarmed, loaded, moved and so on, one official said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record.

The airmen replaced the schedule with their own "informal" system, he said, though he didn't say why they did that nor how long they had been doing it their own way.

"This was an unacceptable mistake and a clear deviation from our exacting standards," Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne said at a Pentagon press conference with Newton. "We hold ourselves accountable to the American people and want to ensure proper corrective action has been taken."

Newton acknowledged that the Air Force needs to "restore the confidence" lost among the American people after the August incident, which raised questions about the safety of the country's nuclear arsenal.

"We are making all appropriate changes to ensure this has a minimal chance of ever happening again," Wynne said.

Newton said the flight in question resulted from an "unprecedented string of procedural errors," beginning with a failure by airmen to conduct a required inspection of the missiles before they were loaded aboard the B-52 bomber at Minot. The crew flying the plane was unaware nuclear warheads were on its wing, though it wasn't explained what role they played in the mistake.

Highest among those to be punished are four officers who were relieved this week of their commands, including the 5th Bomb Wing commander at Minot — Col. Bruce Emig, who also has been the base commander since June.

In addition, the wing has been "decertified from its wartime mission," Newton said.

Some 65 airmen have been decertified from handling nuclear weapons. The certification process looks at a person's psychological profile, any medications they are taking and other factors in determining a person's reliability to handle weapons.

After it was loaded with the missiles, the B-52 sat overnight at Minot, flew the next morning to Louisiana, and then sat on a tarmac again for hours before anyone noticed the nuclear warheads.

Newton avoided repeated questions on what extra security would have been required if crews had known the nuclear weapons were on the plane. But another official later said privately that security was increased as soon as the nuclear warheads were discovered.

The Air Combat Command ordered a command-wide stand-down — instituted base by base and completed Sept. 14 — to set aside time for personnel to review procedures, officials said.

The incident was so serious that it required President Bush and Defense Secretary Robert Gates to be quickly informed.

Wynne prefaced his remarks about the B-52 incident by saying that, in publicly confirming that nuclear weapons were involved, he had authorized a one-time exception to U.S. policy, which states that the location of nuclear weapons will never be confirmed publicly. He said he made this exception because of the seriousness of the episode and its importance to the nation.

The weapon involved was the Advanced Cruise Missile, a "stealth" weapon developed in the 1980s with the ability to evade detection by Soviet radar. The Air Force said in March that it had decided to retire the Advanced Cruise Missile fleet soon, and officials said after the breach that the missiles were being flown to Barksdale for decommissioning.

___

On the Net:

Air Combat Command: http://www.acc.af.mil

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Pauline Jelinek's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (16)
Mubarak-Hussein

Thanks God that it was only a nuclear missile and not a @!$%#ing cigar.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:31 PM EDT
NiteQwill

This story was easily made public to make a warning to the enemies of the US. ie. Iran

Barksdale AFB is a staging point for the Middle East.

Nuclear weapons are transported everyday in the US. By ground and air. You may be driving next to one on the highway and never know it.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:40 PM EDT
JoulesBeef

I dont know.. maybe i need to hear the full explanation. But this doesnt sound right still. What did they accidently grab the wrong missles?? "ooo that one said nuclear" isnt there some kind of check out system for the nuclear weapons? Were they stacked next to each other an we are just relying on grunts to choose from the right pile?

"beginning with a failure by airmen to conduct a required inspection of the missiles before they were loaded aboard the B-52 bomber that flew from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., to Barksdale Air Force Base, La."

UMM sounds like the problems BEGAN prior to that

    Reply#3 - Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:43 PM EDT
    Tim Boothby

    70 is a fair-sized number, and not very surprising considering how many careers were ended over inspections and exercises over the years, a real-world foul-up of this magnitude probably scuttles the careers of everyone from wing commander down to flight chiefs (senior enlisted.) I think the conspiracy-minded will be disappointed on this one though, too may people are getting burned for them all to stay quiet if they were all patsies.

    • 5 votes
    Reply#4 - Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:45 PM EDT
    JJ-196820Deleted
    JJ-196820Deleted
    Harris from the Post

    More prick waving. When's the diplomacy coming?

      Reply#7 - Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:41 PM EDT
      Partisan Hack

      I think that it's commendable that disciplinary action has been taken, but as at Abu Ghraib it sounds rather as if the higher echelons in the chain of command may have escaped punishment.

        Reply#8 - Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:12 PM EDT
        Tim Boothby

        As horrible as Abu Ghraib was, the potential for disaster of people hauling around nukes without realizing it is liable to be much more catastrophic. What if, for example, the crew lost a few engines and jettisoned pylons to reduce weight and streamline the wings without knowiing there was live ordinance on board? Or if it had gone down and first responders go in without realizing that they were at a site that could have nuclear contamination? There's a reason that the strictest rules in the Air Force deal with Nuclear Munitions, this was an F-up of monumental proportions.

        • 2 votes
        #8.1 - Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:41 PM EDT
        Partisan Hack

        Tim,

        I'm not arguing that this was bad stuff and that punishment was warranted, I am just questioning as to how many top commanders took heat as opposed to the front-liners.

        • 1 vote
        #8.2 - Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:23 PM EDT
        Tim Boothby

        Good question, but I haven't seen a list of names. If I were to guess, base commander, operations group commander, maintenance group commander (3 colonels), deputy base and group commanders (3 Lt Colonels), Equipment Maintenance Squadron Commander (Lt Col or Major), Munitions Storage Commander (Lt Colonel or Major) Senior Weapons Manager (Chief Master Sergeant), that's guesses of course, because this could be from two bases as well. There's 9 I can think of that are likely off the top of my head. The there is a flying squadron commander, AMU commander, weapons flight chief, and assorted deputies and assistants, the weapons crews that loaded the aircraft... wow, there's a lot of people that can have a hands on or command or supervisory role in this.

          #8.3 - Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:43 PM EDT
          Reply
          Babel Fish

          It only needs the boss to be cashiered the man incharge is trying to blame everyone else.

            Reply#9 - Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 PM EDT
            Tim Boothby

            The handling of Nuclear Munitions has very specific rules that deal with all levels of responsibility, there have been cases where a base loses a officers and senior enlisted for screwing up an exercise with fake munitions, I wasn't surprised at all to see a much bigger hammer come down for live ordinance. The firing would have been this widespread even if the base commander tried to jump on the grenade and shield others in his command.

            • 2 votes
            #9.1 - Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:45 PM EDT
            Reply
            Alfa Zulu

            I was an Air Traffic Controller for 31 years. I worked hundreds of what were called "Chrome Dome" flights. These were B-52's that criss- crossed the United States loaded with atomic weapons every day of the year during the 1960's and 1970's. I believe that this story was sensationalized. It should have been done internally ! ! !

            • 1 vote
            Reply#10 - Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:15 PM EDT
            Tim Boothby

            True, but in those cases people knew what was on the aircraft, including the crew. If it had all been handled internally it would have been called a cover-up.

              #10.1 - Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:31 PM EDT
              Reply
              breelaboyDeleted
              brianalamptonDeleted
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
              (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
              Newsvine Privacy Statement
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              FUN STUFF:
              • Leaderboard |
              • E-Mail Alerts |
              • Top of the Vine |
              • Newsvine Live |
              • Newsvine Archives |
              • The Greenhouse
              COMPANY STUFF:
              • Code of Honor |
              • Company Info |
              • Contact Us |
              • Jobs |
              • User Agreement |
              • Privacy Policy |
              • About our ads
              LEGAL STUFF:
              • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com