India Activists Decry Gap Child Labor

advertisement

NEW DELHI — With Gap Inc. under fire for selling clothes made by children in India, activists and police raided a sweatshop in New Delhi where 14 boys were embroidering women's garments Monday, illustrating the widespread problem of child labor in the South Asian country.

The children were as young as 10, came from a poor farming district on the other side of the country, and said they had never been given promised wages for working up to 15 hours a day embroidering sequins onto the flowing saris worn by Indian women.

The working and living conditions in the sweatshop just blocks from where the Gap clothes were being made were grim — the boys were packed into a filthy room, sleeping on the same floor where they sewed all day.

"I don't want my money anymore. Now I want to go home," said a thin 15-year-old boy who gave his name only as Hatiquallah.

Speaking at a nearby police station after the raid, Hatiquallah said he had been brought to New Delhi three years ago by a man who promised him work — and money. He never told his parents he was leaving.

"I was waiting for my wages," he replied when asked why he stayed. "I don't want them now."

India's transformation in the past decade into an emerging global economic power has done little to alleviate the country's widespread poverty — and the problems that go along with it, such as child labor.

The government estimates that 13 million children work here, many of them in hazardous industries, such as glass making, where such labor has long been banned. Rights activists place the number as high as 60 million — one estimate has 20 percent of India's economy dependent on kids under the age of 14.

The scope of the problem was clear Monday in the warren of narrow and dark alleys in New Delhi's Shahpur Jat neighborhood, where the sari sweatshop was found just a few houses down from the now-shuttered operation that made Gap clothes.

"Every other house is like this — there are children working in small garment units," said a police officer involved in the raid, Birpal Singh.

Police said they believed the saris were for sale within India.

But the widespread use of child labor in India and the discovery that kids were making clothes for the Gap, which has 90 full-time inspectors who travel around the world, raises questions for India's garment exporting industry, a $10 billion a year business that grew by more than 20 percent last year.

Some of the biggest names in retailing make clothes in India, from Ralph Lauren to J.C. Penny. They all say that oversight of contractors is strict, but child's rights activists disagree.

"International companies hire subcontractors and then forget about it. There is no monitoring at all," said Bhuwan Ribhu, a lawyer who works with Bachpan Bachao Andolan, or the Save Childhood Movement.

For the kids themselves, the issue is not as clear cut as many outside India would imagine — many poor children are expected to work.

Sanjeev, an 11-year-old rescued Monday from the sweatshop, said his parents had sent him off to work in New Delhi two years ago. He had not heard from or seen them since, and was worried they would be upset with him for not sending any money home. "But I never got my wages," he said.

Monday's raid came a day after Britain's Observer newspaper reported that children as young as 10 were found sewing clothes for the Gap in a New Delhi factory. It quoted the children as saying they had been sold to the sweatshop by their impoverished families and were not paid.

Gap responded quickly, saying the factory was being run by a subcontractor who was hired in violation of Gap's policies, and none of the products made there will be sold in its stores.

Indian officials, in contrast, offered no comment on the Observer report.

But child's rights activists said it was just a small part of a bigger problem, as evidenced by Monday's raid.

"The biggest responsibility here lies with the Indian government — they don't develop a way of monitoring" factories, said Ribhu, the lawyer.

"Where the Gap is concerned, at least they've taken a good pro-active stand against the subcontractors," he added.

Ribhu's group organized Monday's raid, finding the sweatshop and tipping off police, who planned to question the boys and then hand them over to child welfare authorities.

Ribhu said he would push authorities to return the children to their families in eastern India.

___

Associated Press reporter Muneeza Naqvi contributed to this story.

  • 2 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.3
0.3
0.3
{"commentId":1139238,"authorDomain":"jdl-28"}

This is why we need to do manufacturing in our country, we have child laws that will protect them. But higher profit is what count most. And us American is causing the problem by not pushing to stop buying all the cheap produce from countries who use child labor.

{"commentId":1139238,"threadId":"168717","contentId":"1057185","authorDomain":"jdl-28"}
    Reply#1 - Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:54 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1140111,"authorDomain":"trina"}

    I think the problem is not where the production is located but the rules that companies follow. Companies are not held accountable for their purchasing practices. Even the US government has said that 50% of the US manufacturing facilities could be considered sweatshops. I think what we have here is a broken system.

    Companies must be held to the same laws no matter where they source, otherwise there will continue to be an incentive to deny the problems and blame the other guy. I hope with the holiday season coming up, US consumers will start to ask more of companies to prove that their supply chains respect the rights of workers both in the US and the rest of the world. I work for an org called International Labor Rights Forum and we just put out a statement that can be found on our website.

    {"commentId":1140111,"threadId":"168717","contentId":"1057185","authorDomain":"trina"}
      Reply#2 - Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:46 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1184593,"authorDomain":"sadashivan"}

      The best practice for GAP, Wal*Mart, Ikea or other textile importers would be to establish own production units with dyeing, stitching machines, finishing and packing in rural village. Over 70% of tailors and garment workers migrate to urban cities to work for sub-contractors of garment or home furnishing exporters. Majority of them are either illiterate or semi-literate so don't know what child labor ( http://www.sadashivan.com ) issue is? For them the issue is survival in expensive urban cities raising money for future life in their own village. Most important factor is that job is unstable so can not settle down at one place; move from one unit to another to get better wage as they are on wage per piece produced and wage decided by demand and supply. Under such circumstances, giving education in schools to children is not easy. For them education to their children is learning survival skill that children learn through child labor ( http://www.sadashivan.com ). For them child not only learns practical skill rather also earns for home. They find their children future more secured than the unemployed graduate in developing world. So they seek help of their children to contribute towards home. Nearly 80% of garment and home furnishing exporters get production done through sub-contractors (fabricators). For exporters having own unit in urban cities is presently not viable due to lack of sufficient finance or increased capacity to meet order quantity, labor issues and expensive affair. Most exporters of urban cities outsource their production from small unorganized stitching and embroidery, button-hole (kaj) units located in either unauthorized or poor residential areas of the cities. For illiterate or semi-literate sub-contractors such places are convenient and cheaper to operate. Such areas are beneficial to avoid government attention, escape labor laws and other benefits too to cut cost of production. A packed garment or home furnishing piece in the rack of a store of an importing country goes from many hands and stages from raw cotton, polyester or other fiber to finished and packing stage. If Garment export units are located in rural villages from where the workers migrate, would be of more help to them towards earning and avoiding children from child labor. Rather would help generating jobs in more areas of manufacturing accessories like; button, laces, threads, machine accessories, hand embroidery and etc;. Child labor ( http://www.sadashivan.com ) elimination depends on improving living standard of the parents. Avoiding contractors or subcontractors is minimizing extra cost would fetch more benefits to direct buyers and the garment workers. Finally, a unit with all manufacturing facility in rural village from weaving to packed shipment would fetch minimum 25% cost reduction. http://www.sadashivan.com/crisisofunemploymentinhandloomandcottagesectors/index.html

      {"commentId":1184593,"threadId":"168717","contentId":"1057185","authorDomain":"sadashivan"}
        Reply#3 - Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:58 AM EST
        {"commentId":7297234,"authorDomain":"huiping858711"}
        ed hardyDeleted
        {"commentId":7297249,"authorDomain":"huiping858711"}
        ed hardyDeleted
        {"commentId":7301912,"authorDomain":"huiping858711"}
        ed hardyDeleted
        {"commentId":10404534,"authorDomain":"breelaboy"}
        breelaboyDeleted
        {"commentId":10422594,"authorDomain":"brianalampton"}
        brianalamptonDeleted
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"168717","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"168717","contentId":"1057185"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking