Mukasey Protesters Act Out Waterboarding

advertisement

WASHINGTON — Protesters staged a waterboarding Monday outside the Justice Department, calling for a Senate committee to reject attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey because of his reluctance to define the interrogation tactic as torture.

The demonstration came shortly before Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., said he would oppose Mukasey during a Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Tuesday on whether the retired judge should be confirmed to lead the Justice Department.

Mukasey's approval was all but assured last week when two Democrats on the panel — Charles Schumer of New York and Dianne Feinstein of California — said they would buck concerns about his stand on torture and support him.

On Monday, about 25 protesters describing themselves as anti-war activists and actors responded with a demonstration of waterboarding that brought a volunteer to retching coughs and tears in less than four minutes.

"I wanted desperately to scream but I couldn't because as soon as I would — water," said Maboud Ebrahimzadeh, a 26-year-old Iranian-American actor from Maryland. "Water would go through the mouth and through the nose."

Set up outside the Justice Department's headquarters, Ebrahimzadeh struggled against his supposed interrogators as they yelled questions and forced him to lie on his back, a cloth over his face, his legs elevated. They poured two gallons of water over his face.

The process was supposed to resemble the process that CIA interrogators are believed to have used on terror detainees until a few years ago. However, Ebrahimzadeh's interrogators put a plastic cage between his face and the cloth to make sure he did not inhale too much water and, potentially, drown or asphyxiate.

At Senate confirmation hearings last month, Mukasey repeatedly refused to say whether he considers waterboarding a form of torture, as claimed by an unlikely coalition of military officials, doctors and humans rights groups.

The Pentagon has banned its personnel from using waterboarding. The Bush administration has sidestepped questions on whether it has allowed CIA interrogators or other employees to use it against terror detainees.

In a letter to the Senate panel Monday, 21 military and intelligence officials urged lawmakers to delay voting on Mukasey's confirmation until he clarifies his position on waterboarding.

"The most likely explanation for Mukasey's reticence is his concern that, should his conscience require him to condemn waterboarding, this could cause extreme embarrassment and even legal jeopardy for senior officials," the letter stated.

Cardin, a Senate Judiciary Committee member, said Mukasey is "a good person, an honest man," but probably cannot be truly independent of the president.

Cardin said he would vote against Mukasey because "on the critical issue of standing up to this administration as an independent adviser against torture, I have my doubts."

(This version CORRECTS that Ebrahimzadeh is a U.S. citizen of Iranian heritage.)

  • 3 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":1160150,"authorDomain":"jaymack"}

A little "show & tell" lesson for Mr. Mukasey who seems to need it. The real pity is that he or his staff were probably not present to learn something.

I wonder if he spoke out against waterboarding if he would have been a shoo-in based on his honest reply and independency of the W/H?

{"commentId":1160150,"threadId":"171904","contentId":"1075095","authorDomain":"jaymack"}
    Reply#1 - Mon Nov 5, 2007 7:58 PM EST
    {"commentId":1162761,"authorDomain":"jgbiggs"}

    Wow, if "waterboarding" is really torture, I would expect those prostestors to be arrested.

    They were not.

    {"commentId":1162761,"threadId":"171904","contentId":"1075095","authorDomain":"jgbiggs"}
      Reply#2 - Tue Nov 6, 2007 4:41 PM EST
      {"commentId":1166567,"authorDomain":"Jamson"}

      What a joke. They tried to hide the plastic "shield" . They wanted the public to think it was actually waterboarding. Enough of the theatrics. Get a job.

      {"commentId":1166567,"threadId":"171904","contentId":"1075095","authorDomain":"Jamson"}
        Reply#3 - Wed Nov 7, 2007 8:19 PM EST
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"171904","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"171904","contentId":"1075095"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking