WASHINGTON — Jesse Lackman says his son spends a dozen hours a week waging medieval combat across the dreary dreamscapes of computer games. Just don't expect to find Lackman sitting beside him battling ogres and dragons.
"It's just such a waste of time," said Lackman, 47, a power plant operator from Center, N.D. "I tell him, 'Do something that has some lasting value.'"
Lackman's avoidance of the digital diversions that captivate his 15-year-old son, Tyrus, is shared by many parents. More than four in 10, or 43 percent, of those whose young children play video or computer games never play along with them, according to an Associated Press-AOL Games poll released Monday.
While experts debate whether electronic gaming is bad news or a blessing for children and their families, many parents are voicing their preference by never — or seldom — joining their kids when it's time to slay cyber scoundrels.
Besides those who simply don't play the games with their children, another 30 percent say they spend less than an hour a week doing so. All told, about three in four parents of young gamers never or hardly ever touch the stuff.
"I don't think it's good for them, the violence, the obsession," said Karen Kimball, 55, of Hale, Minn., another nonplayer who estimates her 17-year-old son plays 25 hours weekly. "No longer is it, 'Let's go out and throw a football.'"
Those who game with their children are likelier to be younger, single and part-time workers than those who don't, the poll showed.
Among them is stay-at-home dad Marvin Paup, 33, of Golden Valley, Ariz., who says he plays 30 hours a week with his son and dozens more on his own.
Their current favorite is "Halo 3," a shooter game played online by thousands of players at a time. His state-of-the-art equipment includes an Xbox 360 console, surround-sound turned up "really, really loud" and a 65-inch wide-screen television, he said.
"That game has bonded me with him," he said of his 10-year-old son Allen. "It's like a whole new reality with me and him."
Overall, the survey highlighted how pervasive — yet age-related — interest in electronic gaming is today.
According to the poll, in which only adults were questioned, 81 percent of children age four to 17 play computer or video games at least occasionally, compared with 38 percent of adults. Typically, both adult and child gamers play two hours weekly — half play more and half less — including about three in 10 who play five hours or more each week.
Reflecting the technology's relatively recent introduction, 59 percent of those age 18 to 29 play at least sometimes, double the rate for people age 50 to 64. There is little difference among users by race or region, with middle-income earners likeliest to indulge.
"It's something to take your mind off business and everything else," said Todd Williams, 33, a salesman from Lexington, Ky., who estimates he plays 10 hours weekly, especially interactive adventure games. "I guess it's the time, which is seldom, that I spend alone."
Sales of games and gaming hardware are rising steadily, said David Riley, marketing director of the NPD Group, a market research firm. He estimates that video and computer game sales this year will total $19 billion in the U.S., up from $13.5 billion last year.
Even so — and despite the publicity given to newer game consoles like the Nintendo Wii, Sony's PlayStation 3 and Microsoft's Xbox 360 — the proportion of adults saying they play electronic games was virtually unchanged from April 2006, when an AP-AOL poll asked the same question.
Casual games like card or board games were the favorite of 31 percent of gamers, about twice the number who like action games, the next most popular alternative. About half of women cited casual games as their favorites, triple the number of men who did so, while twice as many males than females preferred action games.
Adventure, strategy and sports games were also among the most popular.
The poll also found that among gamers:
_44 percent said they play over the Internet;
_26 percent said they spent nothing on the pastime last year, another 46 percent spent up to $200 and 12 percent spent $500 or more, with men usually the bigger spenders;
_Price is the chief factor for people purchasing a gaming console, followed by the availability of games.
The poll involved telephone interviews with 2,016 adults conducted Oct. 9-11 and 16-18, and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points. Included were 770 people who said they play computer or video games, for whom the margin of sampling error was plus or minus 3.5 points.
___
AP reporter Lou Kesten and AP News survey specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report.
I can't wait until mine are old enough play games with me. My oldest is starting to learn, and seems to like stuff where she can move the controller around (like Flow and Lair), so I'm sure she'll love the Wii when I get around to buying one.
"I don't think it's good for them, the violence, the obsession," said Karen Kimball, 55, of Hale, Minn., another nonplayer who estimates her 17-year-old son plays 25 hours weekly. "No longer is it, 'Let's go out and throw a football.'"
Violence, obsession...football I don't see her problem then at all.
Good point, KyleN. If it wasn't video games it would be something else.
And in any case, there's evidence (wish I had a source...there was a SciAm or Discover a couple of years ago that talked about this) that gaming isn't really bad for you at all (as long as you take breaks and all that).
I love being able to share part of my childhood with my son. And that may be the key difference with the parents in this story. I grew up riding my bike to the local arcade and playing games with my friends. I've got to think that for parents raised in the eighties, and going forward, that gaming will be a family activity.
I play a lot of games on computers and always have growing up. It's great being at university and having the free time to be able to do so. I never understood the people who say kids should get out and play more. When I was at home growing up, I would play sports at least 5 times a week and then for my club team at weekends. It was the same with almost all my friends. When in the winter it is dark before 5:30pm you had to be back home. And why is a child keeping their minds stimulated by playing computer games any worse than the parents watching tv for 2-3 hours a day after work in the evening. I was spending my 'tv time' playing computer games, plus I also got the 2 hours of sport in. And it was the same all year round, in the winter playing soccer, spring playing tennis and roller hockey in the summer.
My dad has always played video games with me and I'm 23 now. Actually I've moved back to my parents house, it's a friday tradition now that both of my parents, myself and one of my child hood friends has dinner together and then play the wii.
I still say video games > t.v. for the most part. it's far more interactive, and a lot of games involve strategy and puzzles. Or even now with online games, team work. I also think there is a certain level of morality in it too. Look at the Zelda games, i think they are great for kids. They have vivid imagery, great characters, story, puzzles, and the "save the person in distress".
I do think video games are better than TV in general, because of the interactive/engaging factor. Though, of course, it depends on the game and it depends on the show. I do think it's important for parents to make sure their kids do go outside to play sometimes, or use their imaginations to play now and then, or (gasp) even read a book now and again. But I don't think just totally shutting off video games is the way to go either.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |