Giuliani Dismisses Claim About Expenses

advertisement

ST PETERSBURG — Rudy Giuliani dismissed a report Wednesday that he expensed the cost of his security detail to obscure city offices for trips to a Long Island resort as the then-mayor began an extramarital affair with current wife Judith Nathan.

"First of all, it's not true," he said during a GOP debate hours after the story broke. "I had 24-hour security for the eight years that I was mayor. They followed me everyplace I went. It was because there were, you know, threats, threats that I don't generally talk about. Some have become public recently; most of them haven't.

"And they took care of me, and they put in their records, and they handled them in the way they handled them," Giuliani said. "I had nothing to do with the handling of their records, and they were handled, as far as I know, perfectly appropriately."

He didn't, however, offer an explanation for why the tens of thousands of dollars in costs, which aides say were routine expenses for protection for the mayor, were billed to city offices like the Office for People With Disabilities.

Tony Carbonetti, Giuliani's mayoral chief of staff and his top campaign political adviser, said he's asked Joe Lhota, a former city budget director, ex-deputy mayor and a Giuliani campaign adviser, to explain how such accounting practices could have occurred and why security expenses were not billed to the police department.

"These were all legitimate expenses incurred in protecting the mayor, and his police detail covered him wherever he went, 24/7," Carbonetti said in an interview before the debate. "You just do what you do, and the police go with you. That's just a fact of life when you're the mayor of New York."

Later, an aide said that for accounting purposes, the expenses appear to have been temporarily allocated to city offices and paid for out of the mayor's budget but that the police department ultimately picked up the tab and reimbursed the mayor's office at the end of each year.

Giuliani's affair with Nathan, while he was married to second wife Donna Hanover, has become common knowledge.

But the suggestion, true or not, that he was hiding expenses for liaisons with Nathan in little-known city accounts, could open him up to criticism, remind voters of his three marriages and infidelity and tarnish his good-guy image from the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The report surfaced just five weeks before voting begins, and a couple hours before the GOP candidates shared a debate stage.

None of Giuliani's rivals raised the issue. Debate moderator, CNN's Anderson Cooper, asked Giuliani about it briefly.

The online publication, The Politico, obtained documents under New York's Freedom of Information Law that it says shows the expenses incurred while Giuliani visited the Hamptons had nothing to with the functions of little-known city offices that were responsible for regulating loft apartments, helping the disabled and providing lawyers for indigent defendants.

Weeks after Giuliani left office, The Politico reported, the city comptroller criticized the practice of transferring the travel expenses of Giuliani's security detail to the accounts of obscure offices. In a January 2002 letter to current Mayor Michael Bloomberg, City Comptroller William Thompson described $34,000 in mayoral expenses from fiscal year 2000, which covers parts of 1999 and 2000, to the Loft Board, as part of a preliminary investigation by auditors.

"They were unable to verify that these expenses were for legitimate or necessary purposes," Thompson wrote in the letter that The Politico obtained. He said the mayor's office refused to explain the accounting to city auditors, citing only "security."

The Politico said American Express bills and travel documents it obtained detail hotel, gas and other travel expenses for Giuliani's New York Police Department security detail during 11 trips over three summers of visits to Southampton, the Long Island town where Nathan had a condominium.

  • 7 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
7.6
1.0
{"commentId":1224703,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
But the suggestion, true or not, that he was hiding expenses for liaisons with Nathan in little-known city accounts, could open him up to criticism, remind voters of his three marriages and infidelity and tarnish his good-guy image from the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

This is a totally fictional, good guy image created by media to transform Rudy's abysmal performance on 9/11. The disaster compounded by terrible planning decisions and lack of basic communications abilities. The guy is a loser and it's unbelievable that the sleazy standards that put Rudy's sidekick, Bernie Kerik on the nominee list for head of Homeland Security when his lawbreaking activities has him under indictment now. Employing illegals, taking bribes and kickbacks, on second thought that's exactly the kind of guy the White House was looking for.

{"commentId":1224703,"threadId":"182483","contentId":"1128624","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:05 PM EST
{"commentId":1224866,"authorDomain":"ISPY"}

Maybe that caption should read, "We were up to our eyeballs in it"

{"commentId":1224866,"threadId":"182483","contentId":"1128624","authorDomain":"ISPY"}
  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:58 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":1224801,"authorDomain":"ratigan"}

Better title: Beginning of the End?

{"commentId":1224801,"threadId":"182483","contentId":"1128624","authorDomain":"ratigan"}
    Reply#2 - Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:35 PM EST
    {"commentId":1224853,"authorDomain":"ISPY"}

    Caption;

    Joe Lhota Coke, a former city budget director, and Tony Carbonetti, Giuliani's God father said during a breakfast address in Bedford, "We were this deep in Cocaine" Giuliani gestures. "You just do what you do, and the police go with you. That's just a fact of life when you're the mayor of New York."

    {"commentId":1224853,"threadId":"182483","contentId":"1128624","authorDomain":"ISPY"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#3 - Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:53 PM EST
    {"commentId":1225031,"authorDomain":"fechancellor"}

    Shoes dropping all the damn place for Rudy. The Tennessee Stud got a Brogan in the foot locker for the close, if needed at this point.

    buuuuubyyyy, Ruuuuuuudeeee

    {"commentId":1225031,"threadId":"182483","contentId":"1128624","authorDomain":"fechancellor"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:51 PM EST
    {"commentId":1226177,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

    Voters already knew Rudy was something of an imperfect man. He's 'made mistakes". Rudy may think he's inoculated from Hillary, given that Bill Clinton racked up untold bills in his quest to be serviced, then lied to the entire country about it. But Rudy must still face the first round of voters, many who still value a value here or there. It's one thing to be aware of a candidate's extra-curricular 'hobby'. It's something else to be painted a picture, with details. Larry Craig might still be the "statesman" if his own hobby hadn't been described in such intimate detail.

    If primary voters come to believe another candidate will fight radical Islam as well as Rudy, this story may have legs.

    {"commentId":1226177,"threadId":"182483","contentId":"1128624","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
      Reply#5 - Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:31 AM EST
      {"commentId":1227714,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
      Voters already knew Rudy was something of an imperfect man. He's 'made mistakes".

      Same could be said of Saddam, that's worthless chatter that says nothing. Rudy is a lousy leader and the ultimate crony politician. He did an abysimal job for NYC before and after 9/11. The only heroics are in the editing room of the American media versions of what happened. Truth - Lousy Mayor Rudy is a mythical hero.

      {"commentId":1227714,"threadId":"182483","contentId":"1128624","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
      • 1 vote
      #5.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:56 PM EST
      {"commentId":1228915,"authorDomain":"ISPY"}
      Same could be said of Saddam, that's worthless chatter that says nothing.

      Thats American politics though, worthless chatter. Small Target issues, wedge politicking. How can the No.1 question for G.O.P. candidates be, "Do you believe every word in the Bible is true" and not one of them gave a straight answer.

      This is unacceptable for a country that has decided that it is global cop, judge, jury, executioner, surgeon and savior all in one.

      The world will not put up with this nonsense any longer, you can look forward to becoming the first anglo-saxon third world country. If America can not even produce a candidate that is internationally acceptable, then by 2009 Mexico will have a higher GNP than the US.

      If you would like to immigrate Pamela I will send you some job applications :) send me a CV and i'll find you some work :)

      {"commentId":1228915,"threadId":"182483","contentId":"1128624","authorDomain":"ISPY"}
        #5.2 - Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:02 AM EST
        Reply
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"182483","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"182483","contentId":"1128624"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking