YOKOSUKA — The USS Kitty Hawk wasn't supposed to be here. It was supposed to be wrapping up a long-planned visit to Hong Kong, but China barred the ship at the last minute, offering little explanation.
Beijing, meanwhile, went ahead with plans for a high-profile port call of its own, making the Chinese military's first visit to Japan since World War II.
So, on Friday, a Chinese destroyer and the aging American aircraft carrier sat docked in the same waters, at separate ports, one quietly awaiting two months of repairs and the other basking in a flurry of welcoming ceremonies, honor bands and smiling assurances that China's ever-growing military is "very transparent."
Officially, Tokyo hailed the Chinese ship's visit.
"This is truly a new page in Japan-China relations," Adm. Eiji Yoshikawa, the chief of staff for Japan's navy, said at a ceremony for the guided missile cruiser Shenzhen, which docked at a Tokyo pier on Wednesday. "We welcome this visit with all our hearts."
But both Tokyo and Washington are deeply concerned about recent Chinese military activities, particularly its rapid improvements in missile technology, the modernization of its huge standing army and the expanding reach of its navy.
Early this year, tensions came to a head when China used a ground-based missile to shoot down an old weather satellite at an orbital height similar to that used by the U.S. military. It was the first-ever such test by any nation.
Tokyo and Washington are also troubled by double-digit growth in China's annual military spending, coupled with Beijing's reluctance to divulge military-related information, all of which made the Kitty Hawk incident last week even more disconcerting.
Relations between the U.S. and China have also been strained in recent months by disputes over trade and Iran's nuclear program.
Several days before the aircraft carrier and its strike group were turned back, Beijing refused to let two U.S. Navy minesweepers enter Hong Kong harbor to escape an approaching storm and refuel. The minesweepers, the Patriot and the Guardian, were instead refueled at sea and returned safely to their home port in Japan.
The Kitty Hawk, which had been scheduled to return on Dec. 1, arrived at this base just south of Tokyo on Tuesday.
U.S. military officials protested Beijing's seeming caprice. President Bush mentioned it in a meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi at the White House on Wednesday.
Yang called it a "misunderstanding," but offered no apology.
But in Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao later backed away from that characterization, saying that ties had been "disturbed and harmed" by "erroneous" U.S. actions.
Liu specifically mentioned the U.S. Congress' awarding its highest civilian honor to the Dalai Lama last month as an issue that had upset relations. Though the Tibetan spiritual leader is lauded in much of the world as a figure of moral authority, Beijing demonizes the monk and claims he seeks to destroy China's sovereignty by pushing for independence for Tibet.
Also hurting relations were arms sales to Taiwan, an island which China regards as a renegade province, he said.
But U.S. military officials balked at such explanations.
"As someone who has been going to sea all my life, if there is one tenet that we observe it's when somebody is in need you provide (assistance) and you sort it out later," Adm. Gary Roughead, the chief of U.S. naval operations, told reporters Thursday.
Adm. Timothy Keating, commander of U.S. Pacific Command, was more blunt.
"This is perplexing. It's not helpful," he said of the port call incidents. "It's not, in our view, conduct that is indicative of a country that understands its obligations as a responsible nation."
Japan, which forms a natural arc blocking China from the Pacific, is in a highly sensitive position.
While it hosts the largest U.S. naval base overseas, Tokyo has emphasized expanded engagement with China in hopes of opening up Beijing and keeping potential flare-ups under control.
Economic cooperation has grown rapidly, but political ties continue to be colored by regional rivalry and a lingering legacy of animosity from Japan's invasion and occupation of parts of China in the 1930s and '40s.
The potential for clashes at sea is particularly high.
Japan and China have territorial disputes over gas fields in the East China Sea, and Japan depends heavily on sea lanes near China for the free passage of its oil imports from the Middle East.
Aboard the Shenzhen, Rear Adm. Xiao Xinnian said worries about China's military growth are unfounded.
"There shouldn't be any concern," he told a small group of reporters. "In my personal opinion, China's effort to modernize its military is very transparent."
He added that China's military strategy is defensive and its growth is in step with the growth of China's economy and international role.
That your bidness Mr. Hu, but in my Opine.....much ado about not much.
I'm not surprised. The Chinese decided that the safety of the sailors on the two minesweepers seeking refuge at Hong Kong was worth risking because Washington had the gall to honor a "subversive" like the Dalai Lama. I forsee nasty military relations in the near future for the US and its biggest rival.
Isn't it unprecedented for a port to deny ships its safety during a storm? A violation of maritime tradition?
backroads:
I have certainly never heard of ships being denied safe harbor from an approaching storm. The seas have typically been treated like space or the frontier with regards to protection of travelers from the elements. Apparently authoritarian politics trumps that.
Hey it was a mistake, Like targeting the Chinese embassy in Kosovo. I mean the US would never deliberately use a smart weapon on an embassy, these are generaly viewed as safe Harbours too.
Do you defend every country that crosses the United States, I SPY? LOL
Well in this case I do, I know my countries future is in China, and the US and China are still enemies. Pity, about that. Anyway The Chinese economy is now the biggest in the world, with the biggest GDP, the fastest growing economy, and the most valuable company. It's just economics, no offense but you cant bite the hand that feeds you. Maybe if the US can get over its Messianic crusade for world domination and the US public can stop believing that they have some G.O.D. given right to be the global cop, judge, jury, executioner, surgeon and savior all in one, then people might start to take them seriously again.
I wasn't aware you weren't from the United States. May I ask which country you hail from?
As for your criticisms of America, honestly, you are right. I disagree with you frequently on the Israel issue but I cannot disagree with you here: we Americans have forgotten who we are and how we act in our best times... let us hope the upcoming election brings a new president to remind us of our strength and responsibility in the world to be its voice for morality and conscience like John F. Kennedy did.
Australia
let us hope the upcoming election brings a new president to remind us of our strength and responsibility in the world to be its voice for morality and conscience like John F. Kennedy did.
Hear Hear, I shudder to think who will fill the power vacuum left if America can not find a decent candidate for 2008. The US economy is on a knife edge and unless something is done by Americans then we shall see it pushed off next year. While it has always been my postition that it is testament to the American people that they need to be lied too, it's now time to take the issue of America's future out of hyper-reality and into the real world. So much has changed in the last 4 years for the US, and their are no signs that anyone who is in a position to change US foreign policy entering into this debate. We are starring down the barrel of WW3 and US politicians are arguing over whether they believe every word in the Bible, if they are for gay marriage and is stem cell research anti-right to life. I think the US has much bigger issues to address rather than playing wedge politics and succumbing to partisan infighting.
My opposition to Israel is based o similar thinking, if they dont stop now they will eventually lose an Apartheid type right to vote issue, as they are heavily out numbered by the local Palestinian population. I withdrew my support for Israel about six years ago when I realized they had no future and they have not done a single thing to address this. I think in the case of Israel, it is now to late. Maybe before the last war with Lebanon or if they agreed to the Saudi ultimatum of 2006, but not now. Hamas can smell blood and they wont give up. All they have to do is not recognize Israel and they will eventually win.
Word on the street is that there are more snubs coming as China is giving up its approximately three decade long policy of conciliation and staying quiet with the United States.
China faces a big snub as the Olympics approach.
One can only hope. Bush seems hesitant to do anything.
What we see and what media discloses are not the entire picture. Too bad my security clearance expired, else I'd tell ya more.
backroads:
I agree but I think that the public's perception of this is critical and the administration seems to be doing nothing but trying to smooth over past riffs while they are receiving new blows. They said they want to move on by "past events" and move onto "broader issues." I'm not sure what broader issues you can discuss with a country when they will risk your servicemen's lives by not allowing them safe harbor from a storm at sea... if they won't help you in a simple matter such as that, what makes the administration think they will be open to helping on "broader issues"?
So you think this will be like 1936 scott and Backroads? I dont think Japan will follow suit, They seem happy to let Chinese warships into their harbours.
"broader issues"? The Spratly Islands. If China closes the sea lanes here the US will instantly lose 1/4 of it's oil imports. Unfortunately China is holding all the cards, and they are not happy about the US beefing up the missile defenses on Taiwan.
I'm thinking India will be a foil to Chinese overtures; that is part of the plan, isn't it?
It does appear China holds all the cards, from Burma to Darfur, to flooding the markets, but it faces a backlash in some unanticipated directions, from heightened trade requirements, to attacks on personnel in Sudan and Pakistan, to wherever extremist Uighur decide to strike.
to wherever extremist Uighur decide to strike.
China has its own problems here, What we call the North West Frontier, the Russians call the Southern Frontier and the Chinese call Xing Xang The New Frontier.
India Does not like the US, they have always been more Russia centric, this is due to the fact that the US gave Pakistan nukes, and other things, There are plenty of examples where, even recently India has been less than co-operative with the US despite very generous overtures made to them.
The biggest threat to China is a misplaced sense of Russian nationalism, The border between China and Russia is still closed and rather tightly too.
IMHO I think this will come down to new issues and ones that we could hardly imagine right now, Things like a new space race or some such event. Whoever dominates these new technologies will most likely come out in front.
China has a distinct advantage for two reasons, One, they have a strict noninterventionist policy when dealing with foreign countries, and two, Mao's indelible leftist mark on the Chinese people. The concept of socialism is so ingrained in the Chinese psyche that they are more appealing to 3rd world countries and people.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |