DUBUQUE — Mitt Romney loves statistics. The former venture capitalist pores over charts and grafs. He analyzes situations and data from every angle. It's little wonder, then, that as he campaigns for president, the Republican sometimes shows his wonkish side.
Romney's inclination to mention books, quote from studies, refer to history, lapse into government-speak and rattle off numbers popped up at events across Iowa on Friday.
In this northeastern city, the former Massachusetts governor spent several minutes telling potential supporters at Loras College about a professor who once asked him about "inflection points" in U.S. history — "when everything appears to change at the same time."
Then, Romney explained, in a professorial tone of his own, about the Declaration of Independence "when we redefined the relationship between the citizen and the state" and how the country changed at the advent of the 20th century "when we became a land of opportunity."
Today, he said, "we are at another inflection point, in my view, where America is going to change course."
Such moments bring to mind another Massachusetts presidential candidate. The 2004 Democratic nominee, John Kerry, was known for long-winded riffs filled with Senate-speak, references to arcane policy matters and little-known pieces of legislation.
For his part, Romney's proclivity to recite facts, figures and in-the-weeds details could cut both ways as Iowa Republicans decide who to support in statewide caucuses in just five weeks. Voters could leave events impressed with Romney's depth of knowledge and grasp of the issues. Or, they could be turned off by what can appear to be just another eye-glazing lecture from a politician.
Romney's style contrasts with that of his top rival in Iowa.
Mike Huckabee is the easygoing ex-governor of Arkansas who charms his audiences with homespun stories of growing up in a family of modest means while sprinkling in broad policy stances under the themes of patriotism and core values. The former Southern Baptist minister tends not to dwell on the details of policy matters, choosing instead to tug on his audiences' heart strings.
Conversely, Romney's pitch is heavy on policy — and details.
A former venture capitalist with law and business degrees from Harvard, Romney has been known to fire up slide shows on various policy proposals as he campaigns.
In Greenville, S.C., last month, he projected a PowerPoint presentation on free trade in a "Reagan Zone for Economic Freedom" during events before a Rotary luncheon and a Chamber of Commerce meeting. At the time, he conceded that the dense type, shotgun-splatter diagrams and talk of the X-and-Y axis were a bit much for his audience, joking at one event: "You can turn that off now. We can all go to sleep."
He left the PowerPoint behind as he campaigned in Dubuque and Cedar Rapids on Friday; his style still showed.
_Asked about Social Security, Romney referenced a bill by Judd Gregg, whom he identified for his Iowa audience as a New Hampshire senator. Falling into Senate lingo, he said the bill would "take an equal amount of Republicans and Democrats, put them in a conference and say, 'Come out with a compromise, and we'll vote it up or down. No amendments. We'll just vote it up or down. And it has to pass by a 60 percent margin.'"
_While discussing energy independence and developing alternative energy sources, he referenced a study, saying: "There's a study reported today by McKinsey and Company, a consulting firm, that we could dramatically reduce our energy use in this country by having appliances that are more energy efficient."
_He brought up a separate study — without mentioning its author — when asked about stemming drug use. "Did you see the survey about the impact on families and having dinner with your kids and drugs?"
_On the economy, Romney talked in-depth about the declining value of the dollar. He cited both short-term and long-term reasons for it; interest rates, the "credit crisis" and the loss of confidence in a nation that has "60 trillion dollars of obligations."
_Pressed on whether he would commit to combatting poverty and sickness across the globe, he referenced a book by economist Jeffrey Sachs, "The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time," that he said "lays out a prescription of how you go country by country and develop strategies to help those countries eliminate poverty."
You know, I think this is going to hurt Mitt Romney because people don't choose their leaders in this country based on what they know. I think the American people have come to believe that the President is someone that they should feel comfortable with that they believe, when face with two opposing routes about handling an issue, will have strong enough judgment to choose the right one most times. This is the quality that I think both Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani have going for them in this entire race. People use the "gut-feeling" approach and try their best to be a good judge of horseflesh. I also think people are this way because, perhaps on one or two issues they are educated enough to know whether a candidate like Romney's answer is right or wrong, but on the numerous other issues they won't have a clue. Therefore, the most economical way to decide on what candidate to support boils down to seeing what kind of person they are, what their value system is and deciding if that matches with or conflicts with how the individual voter would handle the situation or want it handled.
The former venture capitalist pours over charts and grafs.
Wow, AP. That's in the lead, too. Nicely done...
You know what's funny? I didn't even notice that. LMAO! Perhaps the writer is an advocate of phonetic spelling. ;-)
Would that be Steffi (or Stephi) Graf or just German Nobel's in general. Maybe he demonstrated an Electro-Graf.
Makes me feel better about my typos.
I hope this doesn't hurt Mitt. What has our country come to if we don't want a president who knows a lot and tells us what he will do and how he will do it?
The current president is an excellent example of how the "decisionmaker" process of choosing a president can fail miserably.
"heavy on policy — and details". A man after my own heart.
Heaven forbid we have a President who knows what he's talking about!
I for one will be voting in favor of competency this election.
Romney-Huckabee is what it ought to be...
They could well be Conservative America's only hope this election season.
IMHO, Huckabee and somebody for VP not involved in this bruising primary are the Republicans' only hope of winning this election. I give Rudy a 50-50 shot but his personal baggage hurts him with the party's core constituencies and makes him a very convenient target for whomever his opponent happens to be in the general election.
Heaven forbid we elect a man who knows what he's talking about!
I honestly think that people will respond better to Romney because of this. For the past 8 years we've had a guy who can barely speak, let alone know what he's actually talking about. I think people are ready for someone who knows their stuff.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |