Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Senate Defeats Effort to Cut Subsidies

Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:34 PM EST
politics, senate, bill, farm-bill
Mary Clare Jalonick, Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Tuesday blocked the first of several planned attempts to slash farm subsidies in the $286 billion farm bill.

The Senate rejected, 58-37, an amendment by Sens. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., that would have phased out most farm subsidies and replaced them with stronger crop insurance for all farmers. The money saved would have been shifted to nutrition and conservation programs designed to protect environmentally sensitive farmland.

Farm-state senators lobbied against the amendment, saying it would be too drastic a change for the agricultural sector.

"It just moves too far, too fast," said Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Tom Harkin, D-Iowa.

Lugar said current government farm programs benefit the wealthiest farmers and should be scaled back as crop prices are hitting all-time highs.

"There has never been a better time for farmers to change," Lugar said.

Supporters of the legislation are pushing for final Senate passage before lawmakers adjourn for the year. The five-year bill would extend and expand crop and dairy subsidies along with popular nutrition aid programs, including food stamps. Most of those programs have been operating under a temporary extension since the last five-year farm law expired Sept. 30.

Democrats and Republicans bickered for a month over how many amendments could be offered to the bill, finally agreeing last week that each party would offer 20 amendments. Several of those amendments are designed to scale back the government's massive agricultural subsidy programs.

The Senate is expected to vote later this week on an amendment sponsored by Sens. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, that would limit overall farm payments to $250,000 yearly per married couple. The current limit is $360,000. Southern lawmakers have traditionally opposed attempts to limit the payments because crops grown in that region, such as rice and cotton, are more expensive to grow.

A separate amendment offered by Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would bar farmers making more than $750,000 from receiving government payments. The overall bill would limit the amount of subsidies paid to those who don't make a large portion of their income on farming, but puts no new limits on farmers.

Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., indicated Tuesday that an expanded renewable fuels mandate for gasoline production would be part of the farm bill. A similar provision is included in stalled energy legislation, and supporters want to include the language in the farm bill in case the energy bill doesn't pass.

The amendment, sponsored by Republican Sens. Pete Domenici of New Mexico and John Thune of South Dakota, would require 36 billion gallons of biofuels be blended with gasoline by 2022.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Mary Clare Jalonick's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (3)
Mars313

YAY! Now we can put corn in EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply#1 - Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:25 PM EST
    Rakesh Dash

    In stead of giving subsidy on agriculture it will be more effective if any policy should be made in national level for the better marketing of the agriculture product and the farmer will get the direct benefit of the government rate then it will help the farmer a lot than the subsidy.

    Rakesh Dash
    Bikaner, Rajsthan
    India

      Reply#2 - Tue Dec 25, 2007 7:08 AM EST
      Rakesh Dash

      In stead of giving subsidy on agriculture it will be more effective if any policy should be made in national level for the better marketing of the agriculture product and the farmer will get the direct benefit of the government rate then it will help the farmer a lot than the subsidy.

      Rakesh Dash
      Bikaner, Rajsthan
      India

        Reply#3 - Thu Dec 27, 2007 6:37 AM EST
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com