NORMAN — New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's potential independent bid for president depends largely on whether the major party candidates embrace the political center, said Democrats and Republicans who met with the mayor on Monday.
The bipartisan gathering attracted former senators, one-time governors and a current lawmaker. But the main draw for the media, students and political junkies at the University of Oklahoma was Bloomberg, the multibillionaire businessman whose change in party affiliation last summer from Republican to independent captured front-page headlines.
Although he repeatedly denies he's a candidate, Bloomberg has the wealth to launch a third-party bid and talk of a candidacy has grown louder. The bipartisan summit even stole a bit of the spotlight from the candidates in New Hampshire, coming on the eve of the first-in-the-nation primary.
"People have stopped working together, government is dysfunctional, there's no collaborating and congeniality," Bloomberg said to applause.
Participants who spent time alone with Bloomberg said he appeared genuinely curious about running, but remained far from committed.
"I don't really think the mayor wants to run. Does that mean the mayor would never run if he still views the system as failing?" said former Sen. David Boren, D-Okla., one of the meeting's organizers, after the event. "I think he's a good American, and I don't think he would close the door on it if he thought it was his duty."
The other leader of the summit, former Sen. Sam Nunn, D-Ga., said the chances of a third-party bid have been dramatically altered by Democrat Barack Obama's victory in Iowa and his embrace of bipartisan unity, combined with other candidates' moves toward the center.
"It's changed the calculation anybody would make in terms of whether they were going to run," Nunn said after the forum.
Obama, during his victory speech in Iowa, told supporters: "You came together as Democrats, Republicans and independents, to stand up and say that we are one nation ... You said the time has come to move beyond the bitterness and pettiness and anger that's consumed Washington."
The Republican winner in Iowa, Mike Huckabee, also referred to a desire for bipartisan unity.
What Americans want, he said in his speech, is for their president "to bring this country back together, to make Americans, once again, more proud to be Americans than just to be Democrats or Republicans, to be more concerned about going up instead of just going to the left or to the right."
These sentiments are good signs, said some of the panelists in Oklahoma.
"I hope that all the candidates say to themselves, 'The public is tired with the partisanship and the special interests, and if I'm going to get elected, I've got to stand up and say what I believe is the big issue, hold myself accountable,'" Bloomberg said. "And maybe you are seeing that."
The group spent several hours Sunday night and Monday morning drafting a joint statement about the urgency of drawing the parties to work together in addressing issues such as health care, climate change, homeland security and the economy. It urged the presidential candidates to provide "clear descriptions of how they would establish a government of national unity," and "specific strategies for reducing polarization and reaching bipartisan consensus."
The forum included former Republican Sen. Bill Brock of Tennessee, former Defense Secretary William Cohen, former Democratic Sen. Bob Graham of Florida, former Republican Sen. John Danforth of Missouri, former Democratic Sen. Gary Hart of Colorado and former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman.
Nunn and Boren said repeatedly they did not intend the meeting to be seen as building support for a Bloomberg candidacy. Several of those attending made it clear they were not interested in that story line, and many said privately that the group was clearly divided on this topic.
Cohen, a Republican, said during the forum that he wanted to find consensus, "not to be here as a promoter for anybody's candidacy or any party, but to serve as a catalyst for starting a deeper and more profound dialogue for what it takes to make this government of ours work."
Some in the audience were skeptical about a Bloomberg candidacy.
"I don't know anything about him, but that's why we're here," said Pam Hughes, a 48-year-old law student and registered Republican from Norman. "Just because you can run New York City — sorry Rudy Giuliani — I don't know if that qualifies you to run the country."
Bloomberg kept a low profile and left without speaking with reporters.
The mayor has been entertaining presidential speculation for more than two years, but time is closing in. Deadlines for access to general election ballots are fast approaching. The earliest is Texas, where Bloomberg would need to collect about 74,100 signatures by May 12, and can only begin the petitioning there on March 5. A number of states follow with June deadlines, including Arizona, Colorado and North Carolina.
Bloomberg is a Democrat-turned-Republican-turned independent. Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel, who attended the forum and has been widely mentioned as a running mate for Bloomberg, indicated that his GOP credentials may not be permanent.
"As of right now, I'm a Republican," he said, "and then we'll see what the world looks like."
If there was any year where an independent or third-party candidate would have not just a shot at shaking things up, but possibly taking the White House...this would be it.
I have researched and written on legal abuses in our judicial system for the past 20 years. I am the author of Overcoming the Devastation of Legal Abuse Syndrome. Thank you for making an issue of a legislature that refuses to respond to the critical issues of their constituents. Parties are less important that doing the right thing. I work with victims of fraud on the court. Many have succumbed to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, not from their original conflict but from the protracted, economically depleting, disorienting experience of the legal system. Absolute proof being provided to the committee on the judiciary has been ignored. If our courts are compromised, we will then lose a civilized place to solve our problems. I fear this trend of judges making law from the bench, cronyism, insider referral systems that pay judges for forcing litigants to use specific services, bias against protective parents, ineffective probate dragging on for years, homeowners associations using illegal lien tactics to take properties and many many more that comprise my clients' problems.
There is only one way to address the issue of partisan politics in America, and that is to change the voting system. America's voting system is one of the most out dated and backwards systems in the world among democracies, and it directly not only contributes to, but enforces, the two party system and partisanship.
Simply changing how the votes are counted would change everything, and make the system more truly democratic.
The one voter-one-vote system, combined with the electoral collage, is a horrible system. Instant Runoff Voting is by far a superior system that actually gives people choices and makes it possible to vote for third-party candidates without completely undermining an election.
See my blog post on this subject here:
This issue cannot be solved until it is possible for Americans to actually vote for who they want to vote for without completely undermining their own interests. As the current system works, voting for a third-party candidate almost completely ensures that the candidate that you like the least will get elected. Our system elects the candidate on the least favored side of the political spectrum any time more than two candidates run, almost without fail every single time, because when more than two candidates run typically the vote of the most favored side of the spectrum gets split, resulting in swinging the vote the other way. The 2000 election is a classic case. It is impossible to have a democracy with such a system.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |