NEW YORK — Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton suggested Sunday that Barack Obama's campaign had injected racial tension into the presidential contest, saying he had distorted for political gain her comments about Martin Luther King's role in the civil rights movement.
"This is an unfortunate story line the Obama campaign has pushed very successfully," the former first lady said in a spirited appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press." "I don't think this campaign is about gender, and I sure hope it's not about race."
Clinton taped the show before appearances in South Carolina, whose Jan. 26 primary will be the first to include a significant representation of black voters. Blacks were 50 percent of primary voters in the state in 2004 and the number is expected to swell this time.
Both New York Sen. Clinton and her husband, the former president, have engaged in damage control this week after black leaders criticized their comments shortly before the New Hampshire primary last Tuesday.
The senator was quoted as saying King's dream of racial equality was realized only when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, while Bill Clinton said Illinois Sen. Obama was telling a "fairy tale" about his opposition to the Iraq war.
Former President Clinton has since appeared on several black radio programs to say he was referring to Obama's record on the Iraq war, not on his effort to become the nation's first black president.
At an awards dinner Sunday in Atlanta celebrating black achievement, Michelle Obama said her husband is the person America needs in the White House right now and was critical of anyone who would "dismiss this moment as an illusion, a fairy tale." He is the right candidate "not because of the color of his skin, but because of the quality and consistency of his character," she said.
As evidence the Obama campaign had pushed the story, Clinton advisers pointed to a memo written by an Obama staffer compiling examples of comments by Clinton and her surrogates that could be construed as racially insensitive. The memo later surfaced on a handful of political Web sites.
Obama later called Clinton's accusations "ludicrous," and said he found Clinton's comments about King to be ill-advised and unfortunate.
"If Senator Clinton wants to be distracted by the sorts of political point-scoring that was evident today then that is going to be her prerogative," Obama said.
Another rival, John Edwards, added his voice to the chorus of criticism of Clinton's comments about King.
"I must say I was troubled recently to see a suggestion that real change that came not through the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King but through a Washington politician. I fundamentally disagree with that," Edwards told more than 200 people gathered at a predominantly black Baptist church in Sumter, S.C.
Later Sunday, the Clinton campaign scrambled to explain comments by one of its top black supporters, BET founder Bob Johnson, that seemed to raise the issue of Obama's admitted teenage drug use.
"I am frankly insulted the Obama campaign would imply that we are so stupid that we would think Hillary and Bill Clinton, who have been deeply and emotionally involved in black issues — when Barack Obama was doing something in the neighborhood; I won't say what he was doing, but he said it in his book — when they have been involved," Johnson said at an event with Clinton in Columbia, S.C.
In his memoir, "Dreams from My Father," Obama described using marijuana and occasionally sampling cocaine as a youth. He declined to respond directly to Johnson later when asked about it.
"I'm not going to spend all my time running down the other candidates, which seems to be what Senator Clinton has been obsessed with for the last month," Obama said between visits to people's door steps in a Las Vegas neighborhood.
The Clinton campaign later released a statement in which Johnson said his comments referred to Obama's years as a community organizer in Chicago.
During the televised interview, Hillary Clinton praised King as one of the people she "admired most in the world," and suggested his record of activism stood in stark contrast to Obama's.
"Dr. King didn't just give speeches. He marched, he organized, he protested, he was gassed, he was beaten, he was jailed," she said, noting King had campaigned for Johnson because he recognized the need to elect a president who could enact civil rights into law.
While Clinton praised Obama's eloquence, she also stepped up her contention that his record did not match his rhetoric.
She noted that while he had spoken out eloquently against the war in 2002 before coming to the Senate, he voted repeatedly to fund the war once in office.
"If you are part of American political history, you know that speeches are essential to frame an issue, to inspire, and lift up," Clinton said. "But when the cameras are gone and when the lights are out, what happens next?"
Obama scoffed at her suggestion of an inconsistent record on the war. Campaigning in Las Vegas, he said he voted for war funding out of an obligation to support the troops, and noted other prominent Democrats, Sens. Edward M. Kennedy and Barbara Boxer, who voted the same way.
"Once we had our troops in, two years into a war, it was important that we do the best job of it," Obama said before speaking at a Pentecostal church. "They have decided to run a relentlessly negative campaign. I don't think anyone who is paying attention can deny that."
Clinton ended her day in South Carolina by speaking to more than 100 women at an invitation-only event at a Columbia bistro.
"We still have too many women who are not being treated fairly in the work place," she said. "This is not a woman's issue. This is a fairness and quality issue."
___
Associated Press writers Philip Elliott and Seanna Adcox contributed to this report from Columbia, S.C., and AP writer Kathleen Hennessey contributed from Las Vegas.
I'd say the response from Obama's camp on Hillary and Bill Clinton's desperate but not so clever use of race is fully justified. Explanations from Camp Clinton cannot be believed at this point. They are what one's gut tells one they are, a power-couple willing to do anything, fight anyone, demean anyone, in the path to ultimate power and power of the pardon.
yeah never understood the terrorist thing.. the rest were not out of the ordinary for presidents but still outrageous to average citizens who dont get such benefits.
but on the other side of the coin..I also find it outrageous that all the iran/contra pardons (some after convictions/some prior) now all work for bush.. I mean these peopel were busted for undermining our constitution and once again marginalizing and bypassing the co-equal branch of government:congress.
and bush can be demeaning to say the least...
good thing most people are looking for something different.
I agree. I, too, believe that Sen. Hillary Clinton is fearful of Senator Obama, and like most of her past dirt (White Water), and her husband's dirt, she, nor her husband, are in the position to point fingers at anyone! Sen. Obama has not ever shamed his country! He was never impeached, nor expelled from any organization he have held, whether in politics or elsewhere. So, yes, the Clintons are a pair of noticeable misfits who need to cease from name calling, and if I'm not mistaken, it is HILLARY, and NOT Bill who is running in this presidential campaign. Maybe I'm having an 'emotional moment,' because the last time I had checked, he is NOT a candidate!
He's black, she's a woman... never before have we had a President who was either. Does it mean that they're any less qualified for the job? No. End of discussion.
Lets move on to some real issues...
couldnt be more true
still it seems politically stupid to make the statement clinton did about mlk, no matter how true or misconstrued as it was.. especially as MLK day coming up.
But i will say it is unlike the clintons who have long enjoyed a great deal of support from the minority community.
According to a post on Huffington Post, yes, there is a memo which apparently started inside the Obama campaign, which highlights, out of context, the comments made by Bill Clinton about "fairy tale" re:Obama. I have read that entire transcript, now, and he was basically saying that the way the media treated Obama on his inconsistencies re: his record on Iraq was poor. In terms of how the press coverage of the depth of these variations on the part of Obama over time, compared to Hillary's, and Obama's constant barrage against Hillary's war votes, it WAS a "fairy tale." Google the Clinton statements IN CONTEXT. When I did, I reversed myself. Re: Hillary's comments, she said that while Martin Luther King, Jr., was THE preeminent orator and visionary of the 1960s Civil Rights era, the Kennedys and Lyndon Johnson were the legislators who brought the dreams into politcal reality. Martin Luther King had plenty of cold blooded political calculation in some of his actions (such as carrying out a march in Selma, AL, led by children, which knowingly put them in harm's way), and which caused a Kennedy intervention to try and avert bloodshed. Lyndon Johnson was a master legislator. His committment to enacting significant, and meaningful legislation to break the status quo on Civil Rights, took "the Dream' forward into history. If Obama-ites are simply too young to remember these realities (that MLK didn't make the legislation happen) that confirms they need to read more. If IObama has changed his views on Iraq enough to warrant a call for better press coverage, deeper press coverage, and hard questions aimed at his inconsistencies, then it's too bad his followers can't handle that. Obama risks the absolute kiss of death, if he continues to accuse the Clintons of racial insensitivity. It has been to Obama's credit he's so far transcended using the "race card." If he pursues this, and the Clintons prevail in their calls for a deeper look see by the Press, and a revisiting of Lyndon Johnson's role in legislation of Civil Rights bills, then he will have confirmed for a segment of the electorate that a part of his movement IS about ... "it's my turn as a black man." If Hillary Clinton does that regarding her gender, then she runs the risk of a blistering (even more than current) backlash by man men who are looking for any excuse to not vote for A WOMAN. These are potential historical candidates. Obama needs to walk lightly. And, while I respect Donna Brazille, she, too, over reacted and made a tactical error to intimate that the Clintons were showing racial insensitivities when they called for accurate reporting and recording of history. Obama will lose a lot of white supporters if he pursues this line of attack. He should drop it and move on, use his eloquence, his gifts, and let the chips fall where they may.
It's black people that are angry and I can see why. Boiled down, her comments sound like she is saying it takes a white man to finish a job a black man starts. They don't like feeling as though the whites are patronizing them. It goes back to Southern slave holders treating their slaves like children to keep them in bondage and from revolting.
Why are the Clintons acting unworthy of themselves?
If Hillary gets to the White House she'd better keep Bill on a short leash otherwise it's fun and games all over again and the GOP retakes Congress and nothing good gets done for the long-suffering American People.
Is the Clinton Campaign imploding?
Are the Clintons racist?
====
At least the campaigns are about issues this time around.
I think it's absolutely hilarious that the Clinton campaign is now interjecting race into the issue and bringing in the guy who runs BET basically just to say "One of our best friends are.. you know.. African American!"
And of course, he goes out and starts attacking Obama for prior drug use.
Clinton 08! How could you not be excited about that?
Well, for starters, Johnson may be the founder of BET, but he is no longer the owner of BET! In addition, he has no room to call anyone out in public about their so-called indiscretions, especially when he did not give owners of Black Enterprise, or any other known black-own publishers of magazines a first crack into buying his company! I saw what he had said on the television during a news segment, and he portrayed himself as a beaten down crumb-snatching black slave who loves his massa'! So as far as Johnson is concerned, he's mute in my eyes, and believe it or not, in a lot of people's eyes because BET no longer holds water in the eyes of many black Americans.
Now, as far as salty-tear Hillary's accusations are concerned, SHE is the one who is FEARFUL of a man who has already exude common sense, poise, articulation, revealed specific plans for America's growth, and sadly, mainstream media has not given him the respect, nor AIR TIME to him. Instead, it's Hillary, Hillary, and some more damn Hillary! The blatant bias that has already exceeded upstream regarding Sen. Clinton's high exposure in the news is a CLEAR indication that a Caucasian woman is better to win than a Black man, whom so happens to have had a Caucasian mother who conceived, carried, birth, and raised in life, become President of the United States of America! THAT'S THE ISSUE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS BOTH OVERTLY AND COVERTLY DOING! The filtering of what is news worthy versus race is so evident that it is sickening!
Clinton, in a nutshell, don't want to lose her black enslaved-minded people in South Carolina whom she and her adulterer husband, Bill, both become and are considered "Good White folks" among the Negroes! THAT is what they are fearing - they fear that an upstanding MAN who has been ordained by a HIGHER POWER to have had parents where he can BENEFIT from both worlds, which makes him a great candidate for change because HE knows what it is to be Black, Caucasian, and since his sister is part Indonesian who's married to an Asian man, Senator Barack Obama is not your "run-of-the-mill" man!
And as far as anyone, particularly many Black folks who continues with this nonsense about Bill Clinton being the 'first' black president can laid that crap to rest. NOW, there IS a REAL Black man running for President of the United States of America!
THAT IS HILLARY'S FEAR. THAT IS BILL'S FEAR! AND QUITE FRANKLY, THAT'S MAINSTREAM MEDIA'S FEAR, or they would not continue this bull@!$%# about race, and who said what to whom!
Never underestimate the Clintons. They had to find a way to criticize Obama without appearing to be racially prejudiced, and now they've found it: slur Obama on every occasion and then blame him for reacting to it. Brilliant! Sheer brilliance by our next president and first gentleman.
Did I mention that Hillary voted giving authority for military force against Iraq? Oh and guess what? Obama voted against it. She has also voted to give Bush a blank check ever since. Not Obama.
The reason he gave for voting against it was that he knew Saddam wasn't a threat, that it would strengthen the terrorists recruiting efforts, we would have to occupy the country for years and that it would cost us dearly. She claims that he doesn't have the experience to be president. What is her experience, and why with all of her experience was she so wrong?
I'm just saying.
Hello People, it is Natural thing, when Obama took allure of winning, starting with IOWA. That made Clinton mad, to see a black guy advancing so popular for the first time in American history. Clinton to get momentum in NH. she had to create a strategy and expose herself to the people looking sad and pitiable, she even cried to draw mass s attention of her disparate mood and emotional distress that night. It was a great shock for her seeing loosing again from the same guy for second day! But women
are always heartfelt beings they associated themselves with that night and gave her a marginal winning over Obama. Every intelligent person understood what happen that night. From that day, the feelings of white and black started, Mrs. Clinton prayed hard and wants America to look after her because she is one of them(white) they should not let a black to become a president, she is so scary about that and the Husband is using tactics as well in same light of white and black. The Media started
interfering as well passing one sided view, promulgating Clinton. I know for sure, Obama had chances to win these elections, but the knot is here, the public can vote whom they want to vote, at the end of everything, the situation will result a matter of life and death, very complicated and difficult to put Obama in the White House. If that is the question, someone will do what it takes to use Clinton of whom men will discriminate against her. GOP may play dirty card to regain the white house again which will bring a situation, unprecedented situation not known in the US before. The National Guard Forces will interven in this; 2008 Presidential Election.
I wish I were those elites to decide on elective president, I could SIT Mrs Clinton as a first woman president of the US. She can do the job better than may previous presidents of this country. Consider this encountering for the future reference. Mufuta Mulongo/. Decatur ,Georgia.
Senator Obama, you've done what you could, but do not forget that the blackman is still a protective class in the US, blacks still face separation on the regular small positions in the Governmental jobs as well as in the private secters. You have made history that can not be revoqued from the books. we accept whatever will be the outcome of these 2008 presidentiak elections in America.
I repeat that Mr. Bob Johnson what he has done against Senator Obama was wrong, that does not exonerate him, it does not make great, but it inferiority him complexly in the eyes of people of other
cultures than his. Clinton's, are now scare of you believe it or not, they said interior that if you can do that to your black brother, what can you do us....white!? You will end up regretting that why did you that, the feelings that going inside you is ugly, he looks like an hypocrite or worst than that.
Bob you have levelled yourself to a low rank, a low class completely. It was better to introduce Mrs. Clinton politically without denigrating anybody. SC population is not going to follow you, you'll see different. You mentioned that Senator Barack was doing stuffs in Chicago neighborhood and you don't know what he was doing? The way you put it was dirty. Using drugs in America is not a problem, how many Governmental, officials recognized, and accepted of using narcotics in their life time? Including Mr. Bill William, wasn't he accused that he used drugs while in High school, he ended up becoming a President of the US. What were you trying to tell Americans they don't know, Senator Obama according to you wrote about his drug problems in his book. This incident reduced your personality among well to do Americans; blacks and whites as well.
Mufuta/ Decatur, Georgia.
Mufuta Mulongo: his comments are a the end!! He is my father and he just recently PASSED AWAY On September 11,2008!! Let his soul Rest in PEACE!! He was also a big fan of Barack Obama and he did a lot of campaighns fpr President Obama!! I WISH he was here to see OBAMA in the White House!! Aww this is so painful!! Every Pleaase Pray for me to continue to make it!! He left a BEATIFUL family behind!!
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |