Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Religion
    • Travel
    • Environment
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Newsvine Tools
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site
{"contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"ap-73"}

Fed Cuts Interest Rates by 75 Bps

Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:21 AM EST
politics, business, federal-reserve, fed, rates, interest-rates, interest
Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke pauses while discussing the near-term economic outlook during testimony before the House Budget Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington in this Thursday, Jan. 17, 2008 file photo. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook. File)

advertisement

WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve unexpectedly slashed a key interest rate by a bold three-fourths of a percentage point on Tuesday, responding to a global plunge in stock markets that heightened concerns about a recession. The Fed signaled that further rate cuts were likely.

The reduction in the federal funds rate from 4.25 percent down to 3.5 percent marked the biggest reduction in this target rate for overnight loans on records going back to 1990. It marked the first time that the Fed has changed the funds rate between meetings since 2001, when the central bank was battling the combined impacts of a recession and the terrorist attacks.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues approved the large rate cut after an emergency video conference on Monday night, a day when global markets had been pounded by rising concerns that weakness in the world's largest economy was spreading worldwide.

Despite the Fed's bold move, Wall Street plunged at the opening with the Dow Jones industrial average down 465 points before stocks began to rebound. The Dow finished the day off 128.11 points at 11,971.19. Analysts said the milder decline at the end of the day after such a rough start showed the Fed's effort to reassure Wall Street had an impact.

In a brief statement explaining its move, the Fed said that "appreciable downside risks to growth remain" and officials pledged to "act in a timely manner" to deal with the risks facing the economy. The action was approved on an 8-1 vote.

Analysts said the fact that the Fed did not wait until its meeting next week to cut rates underscored the seriousness of the situation.

"The world's stock markets are in meltdown so the Fed came in with an inter-meeting move to try to stop the panic," said Christopher Rupkey, senior economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi.

The Bush administration, which had announced on Friday that President Bush supported a $150 billion economic stimulus package, said Tuesday that it was not ruling out doing more than the $150 billion proposal if necessary. Bush and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson were conferring with congressional leaders at the White House on Tuesday, with all sides saying they want to reach agreement quickly.

The Fed was expected to cut rates further, possibly as soon as their next meeting on Jan. 29-30, if there are continued signs that the economy is weakening.

"This move by the Fed was essential," said Lyle Gramley, a former Fed governor who is now a senior analyst with the Stanford Financial Group in Washington. "Bernanke promised in a speech earlier this month to take substantive action in a timely and decisive manner."

Gramley said that Bernanke was now exercising the kind of forceful leadership the markets had been hoping to see since the credit crisis hit in August.

David Jones, chief economist at DMJ Advisors, said Fed officials have a range of options available at next week's meeting from a quarter-point move to a half-point move to holding rates steady but indicating the Fed is prepared to move again between meetings should conditions deteriorate further. Jones predicted the Fed would lower the funds rate to 3 percent by the end of March.

In addition to cutting the funds rate, the Fed said it was reducing its discount rate, the interest it charges to make direct loans to banks, by a similar three-quarters of a percentage point, pushing this rate down to 4 percent.

Commercial banks responded to the Fed's action on the funds rate by announcing similar cuts of three-quarter of a percent on its prime lending rate, the benchmark for millions of business and consumer loans. The action will mean the prime lending rate will drop from 7.25 percent down to 6.50 percent.

Global financial markets had plunged Monday as investors grew more concerned about the possibility that the United States, the world's largest economy, could be headed into a recession. Many markets suffered their biggest declines since the September 2001 terrorist attacks.

In its statement, the Fed said it had decided to cut the federal funds rate "in view of a weakening of the economic outlook and increasing downside risks to growth."

The central bank said that the strains in short-term credit markets have eased a bit, but "broader financial market conditions have continued to deteriorate and credit has tightened further for some businesses and households. Moreover, incoming information indicates a deepening of the housing contraction as well as some softening in labor markets."

Before Tuesday's move, the Fed had cut interest rates three times, beginning in September, the month after a severe credit crunch had roiled Wall Street and global financial markets. The Fed cut the funds rate by a half-point in September and then by smaller quarter-point moves in October and December.

"The committee will continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and will act in a timely manner as needed to address those risk," the Fed statement said.

The Fed's action was approved on an 8-1 vote with William Poole, president of the Fed's regional bank, dissenting. The statement said that Poole objected because he did not believe current conditions justified a rate move before the Fed's meeting next week.

© 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
{"contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"ap-73"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Martin Crutsinger's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Business Vine, Family Finances
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (52)
{"commentId":1388495,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
othDeleted
{"commentId":1388498,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
othDeleted
{"commentId":1388510,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
othDeleted
{"commentId":1388514,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
othDeleted
{"commentId":1388580,"authorDomain":"Griff69"}
Griff69

You mean this button and these people? Grrrrrr, still not allowed to include links. Greywolf seeded a story citing: The west must be ready to resort to a pre-emptive nuclear attack to try to halt the "imminent" spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto for a new Nato by five of the west's most senior military officers and strategists.

There is very little done by our illustrious leaders over the last century that I would consider "rational".

Sorry, misplaced my repsonse too...

{"commentId":1388580,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"Griff69"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:11 AM EST
{"commentId":1388620,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
othDeleted
Reply
{"commentId":1388898,"authorDomain":"partisanhack"}
Partisan Hack

Where's that benificent "invisible hand of the marketplace" when you need it?

Our economy has been neglected enormously for seven years as corporations use consumer debt to sponge up products that power executive salaries. The price is about to be paid big-time.

{"commentId":1388898,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"partisanhack"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#6 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:15 AM EST
{"commentId":1389069,"authorDomain":"newcreation"}
Joshua Deacon

Where's that benificent "invisible hand of the marketplace" when you need it?

The government has nailed it to a floorboard somewhere.

{"commentId":1389069,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"newcreation"}
  • 7 votes
#6.1 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:01 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":1388967,"authorDomain":"ambani"}
ambani

i am surprised at the length of time the Fed takes to gather Data on US Economy, then take its own fanciful time and level of cuts; the Fed is the confuser and confused!!! Bernanke is becoming reactive and not pro-active in dealing with the problems of US economy. Now he will have to not only deal with greater measures but also device means to not further fragile the world economy. also.

{"commentId":1388967,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"ambani"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:33 AM EST
{"commentId":1389072,"authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}
FDBryant3

Bugger - I just realized the interest rates on my savings account are going to drop.

{"commentId":1389072,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"fdbryant3"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#8 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:02 PM EST
{"commentId":1390093,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
othDeleted
Reply
{"commentId":1389121,"authorDomain":"prez"}
Matt Kennedy

A new global depression... that would be interesting. We'd certainly have plenty of bloggers then to tell us just how crappy their life has gotten.

{"commentId":1389121,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"prez"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#9 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:11 PM EST
{"commentId":1389242,"authorDomain":"lightsweet"}
lightsweet

PLEASE STOP MISINFORMING THE PUBLIC BY STATING IN YOUR ARTICLE THAT "The Fed cut the RATES". IT IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BUT A PRIVATE ENTITY RUN BY VARIOUS RICH COMPANIES.

THIS IS THE BOARD OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK. OWNED AND OPERATED BY PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS.

THIS BANK IS NOT OWNED OR RUN BY THE GOVERNMENT. IT IS PRIVATE.
DON'T FORGET TO MENTION THIS TRUTH IN ALL YOUR ARTIFICES AND DOCUMENTS.

THANK YOU.

{"commentId":1389242,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"lightsweet"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#10 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:43 PM EST
{"commentId":1389286,"authorDomain":"rkurtz57"}
mee

First of all the "Fed" is short for the Federal Reserve... it is, as you mention, not directly controlled by the government. However, there's no need to shout in all caps, that's just annoying.

{"commentId":1389286,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"rkurtz57"}
  • 7 votes
#10.1 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:57 PM EST
{"commentId":1389838,"authorDomain":"prez"}
Matt Kennedy

FIGHT THE POWER -- NOW ONLY ON NEWSVINE! (Owned by MSNBC)

{"commentId":1389838,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"prez"}
    #10.2 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:45 PM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":1389487,"authorDomain":"DesmondUK"}
    DesmondUK

    IS THIS ANNOYING YOU?

    {"commentId":1389487,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"DesmondUK"}
      Reply#11 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:58 PM EST
      {"commentId":1395598,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
      othDeleted
      Reply
      {"commentId":1389488,"authorDomain":"javabeanboy"}
      javabeanboy

      Shake the middle class out of investment and ownership, then everything will be ok.

      {"commentId":1389488,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"javabeanboy"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#12 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:58 PM EST
      {"commentId":1390104,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
      othDeleted
      Reply
      {"commentId":1389867,"authorDomain":"digiambattista"}
      Ernesto DiGiambattista

      Big Ben needs to stop acting like a Monday morning quarterback and start acting a Fed Chairman.
      He should have cut the rate on Thursday of last week. 75bps is not enough now and we need 50bps more...
      I am very concerned with performance.
      I have been reporting on this for over year! Big Ben, Mr. Paulson and Mr. Bush need to get into a room with Congress and lock the doors until they figure out how to get out of this mess!
      If they do not follow up with additional actions from the 75bps cut, the cut will then have no impact.

      check my blog for additional information

      {"commentId":1389867,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"digiambattista"}
        Reply#13 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:53 PM EST
        {"commentId":1390112,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
        othDeleted
        {"commentId":1390133,"authorDomain":"phree"}
        phree

        Has anybody ever considered that maybe they WANT this to happen?

        All be design IMO.

        Remember, the bad guys sometimes create a crisis in order to justify the implementation of their solution.

        The Fed (private bank) has been controlling America through the monetary policies ever since the creation of the Federal Reserve Act.

        Perhaps they are intentionally sinking the dollar so they can create the Amero and the NAU?

        Could this lead to Bush declaring a "National Emergency" as described in Presidential Directive 51, thereby which he could suspend the Constitution, postpone the elections, and become a de facto dictator?

        {"commentId":1390133,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"phree"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#15 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:03 PM EST
        {"commentId":1390263,"authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}
        Brian White

        Perhaps they are intentionally sinking the dollar so they can create the Amero and the NAU?

        There's no need to look for sinister motives like that. They can have a well meaning intent behind their inflationary monetary policy, like boosting exports, or allowing the gov't to pay off debts with cheap dollars. Their inflationary policy is nothing new.

        {"commentId":1390263,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}
        • 1 vote
        #15.1 - Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:37 PM EST
        {"commentId":1392543,"authorDomain":"phree"}
        phree

        There's no need to look for sinister motives like that.

        I disagree. There is always a need to look at every option, sinister or otherwise.

        {"commentId":1392543,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"phree"}
        • 1 vote
        #15.2 - Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:57 AM EST
        {"commentId":1392903,"authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}
        Brian White

        Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence or stupidity.

        {"commentId":1392903,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}
        • 2 votes
        #15.3 - Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:37 PM EST
        {"commentId":1393075,"authorDomain":"phree"}
        phree

        What is you reasoning behind this theory of yours?

        Is it because you want to protect the public by not allowing them to think for themselves?

        The "big banks" cheated themselves into a powerful position when the Federal Reserve Act was signed. Some people believe it is unconstitutional. If those people are correct, that makes the central banking system illegal. If that is so, than can you explain why we should trust them?

        "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws."
        -- Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

        "It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
        -- Henry Ford

        "We have, in this country, one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board. This evil institution has impoverished the people of the United States and has practically bankrupted our government. It has done this through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it."
        -- Congressman Louis T. McFadden in 1932 (Rep. Pa)

        "The Federal Reserve banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this nation is run by the International bankers."
        -- Congressman Louis T. McFadden (Rep. Pa)

        "[Every circulating FRN] represents a one dollar debt to the Federal Reserve system."

        -- Money Facts, House Banking and Currency Committee

        "This [Federal Reserve Act] establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President [Wilson} signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized....the worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill."

        -- Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. , 1913

        "From now on, depressions will be scientifically created."

        -- Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. , 1913

        {"commentId":1393075,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"phree"}
        • 1 vote
        #15.4 - Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:26 PM EST
        {"commentId":1393112,"authorDomain":"Griff69"}
        Griff69

        Could this lead to Bush declaring a "National Emergency" as described in Presidential Directive 51, thereby which he could suspend the Constitution, postpone the elections, and become a de facto dictator?

        Man, I hope so. Boiled frog, anyone?

        {"commentId":1393112,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"Griff69"}
          #15.5 - Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:35 PM EST
          {"commentId":1393158,"authorDomain":"acidreflux"}
          AdipicAcid

          Lindbergh is a rather tainted source, don't you think? I mean he was rather enthusiastic for state control of practically everything later on: he was a great admirer of Der Fuhrer, after all.

          {"commentId":1393158,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"acidreflux"}
          • 1 vote
          #15.6 - Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:47 PM EST
          {"commentId":1393215,"authorDomain":"phree"}
          phree

          That's Irrelevant. I can find you hundreds of quotes that aren't from Lindbergh.

          My advice is read the Constitution, then read the Fed Act, then make up your own mind.

          {"commentId":1393215,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"phree"}
          • 1 vote
          #15.7 - Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:03 PM EST
          {"commentId":1393371,"authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}
          Brian White

          I do not believe the Fed is constitutional. However, I see no reason to believe that anyone involved with the Fed would want there to be an Amero, or would want Bush to declare a state of emergency. What would they have to gain from that? If you wish to advance that theory, then please provide some supporting evidence for that theory, and not just some quotes showing that the Fed is a bad idea.

          Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence or stupidity.

          What is you reasoning behind this theory of yours?

          It is called Occam's razor. The simplest explanation is most likely true. And while people do occasionally carry out bad acts from malice, they carry out bad acts from incompetence and stupidity much more often, like orders of magnitude more often. Hence, that is my default assumption for an explanation of behavior I disagree with, and it will remain so until there is solid evidence I should change my mind.

          This is also a well known quote

          "Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence."
          -- Napoleon Bonaparte

          {"commentId":1393371,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"wbrianwhite"}
          • 2 votes
          #15.8 - Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:49 PM EST
          {"commentId":1394344,"authorDomain":"phree"}
          phree

          Actually if you re-read my first comment I only posed to questions...

          Perhaps they are intentionally sinking the dollar so they can create the Amero and the NAU?

          Could this lead to Bush declaring a "National Emergency" as described in Presidential Directive 51, thereby which he could suspend the Constitution, postpone the elections, and become a de facto dictator?

          I'm only concerned with putting possibilities out there. I am not trying to push a theory, merely spark a debate about it and bring awareness.

          Apply Occam's Razor to these facts...

          There is a lot of talk about the Amero, even by economists, and even in the Mainstream media. There is also a precedent --The Euro.

          There are also people attempting to form a (de facto?) North American Union. The S.P.P.
          There is also precedent here, in the European Union, the African Union, the Asia/Pacific Union(s)

          There IS a directive 51 that would make Bush a dictator in the event of a "national emergency". Just check the White house's own website.

          Then theres the Fed Act...which you admit may be illegal. Which they created the crisis that enabled them to enact it.

          There's warnings all throughout history about this very event.

          Then there's the fact that the current administration is a pack of known liars.

          Apply Occam's razor here, with an open mind and see what you come up with.

          If you really need links to what I have stated I will provide them for you. But, you really don't need me to figure it out. All you need is Google.

          {"commentId":1394344,"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763","authorDomain":"phree"}
          • 1 vote
          #15.9 - Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:47 PM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":1395619,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
          othDeleted
          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"206741","isPrivate":false}
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
          Newsvine Privacy Statement
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          {"threadId":"206741","contentId":"1245763"}
          Start TrackingStart Tracking
          Stop TrackingStop Tracking
          Back To Top | Front Page
          FUN STUFF:
          • Leaderboard |
          • E-Mail Alerts |
          • Top of the Vine |
          • Newsvine Live |
          • Newsvine Archives |
          • The Greenhouse |
          • Newsvine Tools
          COMPANY STUFF:
          • Code of Honor |
          • Company Info |
          • Contact Us |
          • Jobs |
          • User Agreement |
          • Privacy Policy
          LEGAL STUFF:
          • © 2005-2010 Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com