NASA May Buy Russian Transport Services

Mon Feb 4, 2008 9:28 PM EST

LOS ANGELES — NASA hinted that it might rely on Russian rockets to deliver crew and cargo to the international space station when the shuttle fleet is retired in 2010 if private space companies fail to fill the gap.

The space agency in 2006 earmarked nearly $500 million in seed money over five years to two budding commercial space companies — SpaceX and Rocketplane Kistler — to build and test new spacecraft to possibly fly to the space station.

The program ran into trouble last year when Oklahoma-based Rocketplane, which received about $32 million from NASA, failed to raise enough money from private sources. NASA canceled the contract and reopened the bidding process for the remaining $173 million.

A new winner is expected to be selected this month.

The space agency would prefer to give American aerospace firms the chance to deliver cargo to the space station but may be forced to buy such services from the Russians if commercial rockets are "not yet demonstrated and available," said NASA Deputy Administrator Shana Dale.

"While I do not like the idea that the United States may have no option other than to purchase crew transport services from Russia ... I am glad that the Russians are our partners and have such capabilities," Dale said during NASA's budget briefing Monday.

NASA is under orders to finish the space station and retire the shuttle fleet by 2010. It needs to find a launch vehicle to ferry cargo to the space station while it works on the Orion program, the shuttle replacement with a first launch planned around 2014.

SpaceX, or Space Exploration Technologies, dismissed the idea that its rocket would not be ready in time.

The Hawthorne-based company founded by entrepreneur Elon Musk is building a 180-foot-long reusable launch vehicle called Falcon 9, named after Star Wars' Millennium Falcon. It plans to ship its Falcon 9 to Cape Canaveral, Fla., by the end of the year and start test flights at an unspecified date.

"There will be no gap in American access to the space station," Musk said in a statement.

___

On the Net:

NASA: http://tinyurl.com/yuh7h3

SpaceX: http://www.spacex.com

2 Votes
Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

Alicia Chang's Column, All of Newsvine
Groups: none
Regions: United States , Russia , Los Angeles

Public Discussion (5)

What's this?

Who's leading the conversation?

This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.

2.1

{"commentId":1436339,"authorDomain":"Defektiv"}

Defektiv

its about freaking time. i couldn't believe when NASA refused offers of coop from Russia a little while ago. you can't deny they have the brains and passion for outer space. the US may have some, but Russia is by far and large better at it. we only won the space race because they went broke.

with US money (i say that sparingly since our economy is tanking and the public is reaching for feel-good candidates instead of those that can possibly change it) and Russia brains, we could be exploring our solar system with humans in a decade or two.

{"commentId":1436339,"threadId":"214105","contentId":"1278347","authorDomain":"Defektiv"}

1 vote

#1 - Mon Feb 4, 2008 11:12 PM EST

{"commentId":1436536,"authorDomain":"wingod"}

space guy

Oh I would much rather have a U.S. solution even though I have sent a payload to the station via the Russian Soyuz in 2001.

{"commentId":1436536,"threadId":"214105","contentId":"1278347","authorDomain":"wingod"}

1 vote

#2 - Tue Feb 5, 2008 1:10 AM EST

{"commentId":1440382,"authorDomain":"keithmv"}

Keith Vauquelin

All I can say is:

"GO ELON!"

He CAN pull off COTS, successfully.

Free enterprise and entrepreneur-ism CAN solve this issue.

NOT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.

{"commentId":1440382,"threadId":"214105","contentId":"1278347","authorDomain":"keithmv"}

#3 - Wed Feb 6, 2008 6:59 AM EST

{"commentId":1441711,"authorDomain":"wingod"}

space guy

Keith

As much as I like Elon, the COTS procurement is the federal government subsidizing a private company's business.

{"commentId":1441711,"threadId":"214105","contentId":"1278347","authorDomain":"wingod"}

1 vote

#4 - Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:51 PM EST

{"commentId":1444318,"authorDomain":"keithmv"}

Keith Vauquelin

I understand your point, Space Guy, but the fact is that an entrepreneur, not one of the established aerospace companies, is working to do what they cannot - provide RELIABLE and relatively INEXPENSIVE launch and transportation services to NASA.

{"commentId":1444318,"threadId":"214105","contentId":"1278347","authorDomain":"keithmv"}

#5 - Thu Feb 7, 2008 9:48 AM EST

{"canLink":false,"threadId":"214105","isPrivate":false}

Backyard

NASA May Buy Russian Transport Services

Published to:

FUN STUFF:

COMPANY STUFF:

LEGAL STUFF: