LOS ANGELES — NASA hinted that it might rely on Russian rockets to deliver crew and cargo to the international space station when the shuttle fleet is retired in 2010 if private space companies fail to fill the gap.
The space agency in 2006 earmarked nearly $500 million in seed money over five years to two budding commercial space companies — SpaceX and Rocketplane Kistler — to build and test new spacecraft to possibly fly to the space station.
The program ran into trouble last year when Oklahoma-based Rocketplane, which received about $32 million from NASA, failed to raise enough money from private sources. NASA canceled the contract and reopened the bidding process for the remaining $173 million.
A new winner is expected to be selected this month.
The space agency would prefer to give American aerospace firms the chance to deliver cargo to the space station but may be forced to buy such services from the Russians if commercial rockets are "not yet demonstrated and available," said NASA Deputy Administrator Shana Dale.
"While I do not like the idea that the United States may have no option other than to purchase crew transport services from Russia ... I am glad that the Russians are our partners and have such capabilities," Dale said during NASA's budget briefing Monday.
NASA is under orders to finish the space station and retire the shuttle fleet by 2010. It needs to find a launch vehicle to ferry cargo to the space station while it works on the Orion program, the shuttle replacement with a first launch planned around 2014.
SpaceX, or Space Exploration Technologies, dismissed the idea that its rocket would not be ready in time.
The Hawthorne-based company founded by entrepreneur Elon Musk is building a 180-foot-long reusable launch vehicle called Falcon 9, named after Star Wars' Millennium Falcon. It plans to ship its Falcon 9 to Cape Canaveral, Fla., by the end of the year and start test flights at an unspecified date.
"There will be no gap in American access to the space station," Musk said in a statement.
___
On the Net:
NASA: http://tinyurl.com/yuh7h3
SpaceX: http://www.spacex.com
its about freaking time. i couldn't believe when NASA refused offers of coop from Russia a little while ago. you can't deny they have the brains and passion for outer space. the US may have some, but Russia is by far and large better at it. we only won the space race because they went broke.
with US money (i say that sparingly since our economy is tanking and the public is reaching for feel-good candidates instead of those that can possibly change it) and Russia brains, we could be exploring our solar system with humans in a decade or two.
Oh I would much rather have a U.S. solution even though I have sent a payload to the station via the Russian Soyuz in 2001.
All I can say is:
"GO ELON!"
He CAN pull off COTS, successfully.
Free enterprise and entrepreneur-ism CAN solve this issue.
NOT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.
Keith
As much as I like Elon, the COTS procurement is the federal government subsidizing a private company's business.
I understand your point, Space Guy, but the fact is that an entrepreneur, not one of the established aerospace companies, is working to do what they cannot - provide RELIABLE and relatively INEXPENSIVE launch and transportation services to NASA.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |