NEW ORLEANS — Democrat Barack Obama raised $7.2 million in less than 48 hours post Super Tuesday and rival Hillary Rodham Clinton collected $4 million, giving him a financial edge that's caused consternation within a Clinton campaign clamoring for attention-getting debates.
The remarkable outpouring of contributions recorded since Tuesday's contests in 22 states comes on the heels of an eye-popping $32 million raised by Obama in January and the record-shattering $100 million each Obama and Clinton raised in 2007 in their neck-and-neck race for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Obama has been riding a wave of fundraising from large donors and small Internet contributors. While not matching Obama's pace, Clinton also saw an online surge of donations from 35,000 new contributors since midnight Tuesday, Clinton campaign aides said.
Clinton acknowledged Wednesday that she loaned her campaign $5 million late last month as Obama was outraising and outspending her heading into the Feb. 5 Super Tuesday contests. Some senior staffers on her campaign also are voluntarily forgoing paychecks as the campaign heads into the next round of contests.
Clinton said the loan and salary deferrals were not a sign of financial difficulties.
"No, not at all," Clinton told ABC News in an interview Thursday. "We were outraised in January, which we took steps immediately to address, and I think the results on Super Tuesday showed that we were more than competitive. Since Tuesday we've raised millions of dollars on the Internet, so we're going to be fine.
"And my staff is so dedicated that they stepped up and said, 'Look, this is so important we're going to do our part.' I did my part. So we're going to be in very good financial shape. People are rallying around, and I think by the end of the week we'll be back on track."
Clinton's national finance co-chairman Alan Patricof said Tuesday that fundraisers were targeting many thousands of potential high donors nationally who had not yet given the maximum donation of $2,300 to spend in the primary season.
He also said Clinton planned to return to New York before the end of February to attend a major fundraising gala there.
"We are feeling very positive about the outcome Super Tuesday, and we're attracting a lot of new people who want to contribute. But we know we have to raise a lot of money to be competitive," he said.
Buoyed by strong fundraising and a primary calendar in February that plays to his strengths, Obama plans a campaign blitz through a series of states holding contests this weekend and hopes to win primaries in the Mid-Atlantic next week and Hawaii and Wisconsin the following week.
He campaigned in Louisiana Thursday, vowing to help New Orleans recover from Hurricane Katrina by improving levees, schools and health care, and closely overseeing the Federal Emergency Management Agency if he becomes president. The state holds its contest Saturday.
Obama accused President Bush of failing to do enough to help the Gulf Coast recover from the devastating storm of August 2005. He proposed a multi-faceted program for the area, but did not indicate its total cost or how he would pay for it.
His proposal would help New Orleans hire police officers, repair schools and improve public transit. It would provide financial incentives to attract teachers, businesses and medical professionals.
"When I am president," Obama told about 4,000 people in Tulane University's basketball arena, "we will finish building a system of levees that can withstand a 100-year storm by 2011, with the goal of expanding that protection to defend against a Category 5 storm."
Clinton, with less money to spend and less confident of her prospects in the February contests, plans to concentrate on Ohio and Texas, large states with primaries March 4 and where polling shows her with a significant lead. She even is looking ahead to Pennsylvania's primary April 22, believing a large elderly population there will favor the former first lady.
In a sign of Clinton's increasing concern about Obama's growing strength, her campaign manager, Patti Solis Doyle, sent a letter Thursday to the Obama campaign seeking five debates between the two candidates before March 4.
"I'm sure we can find a suitable place to meet on the campaign trail," Solis Doyle wrote. "There's too much at stake and the issues facing the country are too grave to deny voters the opportunity to see the candidates up close."
Obama rejected a debate proposed as soon as this Sunday to be broadcast on ABC, but his campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Thursday, "there will definitely be more debates, we just haven't set a schedule yet."
(This version CORRECTS SUBS grafs 19-20 to correct Clinton campaign manager's name 'Patti Solis Doyle' sted 'Patti Solis.')
yes they can.
And at the moment, Hillary can't. But I don't think there's any shortage of foreign Asian cash out there. And Hillary's public-sacrifice may bring in a boost in female dollars.
"Hillary's public-sacrifice may bring in a boost in female dollars." Yes, she should cry again. Maybe that will convince us female voters that she is, without doubt, a strong, confident leader who won't crack under pressure.
Why am I getting the impression that Selchie is a male. Hmm, Crying is not a form of weakness. It is simply an expression of feeling. Saying, "...leader who won't crack under pressure." is also an expression of feeling. Hillary has had alot of experience dealing with bigger fish than Obama. He is very young and full of unproven rhetoric. He needs to get some age and experience before he runs for president.
Tears are not a sign of weakness, but I don't recall ever seeing Margaret Thatcher cry or even choke up in public. Just saying.... And before anyone jumps on me about it, yes, I do know that some people are just more expressive than others.
NEWSSTATESMAN quote:
"Hard on Gazza's heels came the Iron Lady. No one had thought Margaret Thatcher capable of any emotion at all, let alone the wetter kind that she had taunted her fellow party members for displaying. But when in November 1990 one after another, wets and dries alike, filed into the prime ministerial office and told her she had to go, it aroused emotions that had lain dormant for the 11 years in which she had visited unemployment, homelessness and financial misery upon millions. As the car swept her away from No 10 Downing Street for the last time, she wept and the cameras caught it."
Yes, even Margaret Thatcher cried.
Money answereth all things...?
====
Is the nomination up for sale right now? Poor Mitt Romney just threw $75 million down the tubes. What a mor(m)on…
====
I believe that he asked for "loans" from his supporters. He promised to use the money in his race after he gained the GOP nomination. He promised to pay that money back if he did not get it. Hmm. What I am interested in hearing is where he is going to throw his electoral votes. Perhaps he can be like pretty boy Edwards and hold out for another vice president nomination. I personally am sickened by Edwards and Romney alike. And, if Obama gets the nomination, I am voting for McCain.
The most ironic part about all of Obama's fundraising is that in his book The Audacity of Hope, Obama spent a good deal of time talking about how difficult it was to raise money for his Illinois senatorial campaign. Oh, how times have changed...
Some senior staffers on her campaign also are voluntarily forgoing paychecks as the campaign heads into the next round of contests.
Wow. Just wow.
EDIT: Never mind. I should read before I comment.
I was $25 of that. I think the most inspiring part of Obama's fundraising is the amount that has come from small donors like me. I know dozens of college students who have donated, something I imagine is rather rare in politics.
I'm in no financial position to be giving away money, but for this cause, Obama's cause, two donations totaling $60 is money well spent.
I don't think that the majority of Obama's money has come from College Students. Ted Kennedy and the others have alot of money. You are too young to remember Geraldine Ferrarow (sp). She was the first women vice presidential candidate. I was in college then. I don't even remember who the presidential candidate was. Obama appeals to the young because he is young. He has less support with older voters because they have heard his rhetoric of "hope" before. Words without works are meaningless.
(1) Dukakis was the nominee and it is disturbing that you comment on history and don't know that.
(2) I find your cynicism boring. When did you hear the rhetoric of "hope" before?
(3) You support Clinton? Ok, where are the works behind her words? You mean when she was a Civil Rights Attorney, Community Organizer in the inner city, President of Harvard Law Review, taking point on fixing a broken capital punishment system, ethics reform in one of the most corrupt states (bar Louisiana)? Oh wait, that's Obama.
You must be talking about her time as a corporate lawyer, sitting on the board of Wal-Mart or when she was first lady and destroyed any hope of universal health care for over a decade.
No to all of the above. I was talking about the work that she did, yes as first lady, but also first lady when Clinton was governor.
If I lived through the history, I don't have to remember all of the names and details. Since you did a search of who Geraldine ran with, why don't you do another search of the, "message of hope."
What gets boring is children yacking as though they are experts on events and content when they are only experts in web searches.
Another thing that is boring is Obama comparing himself to JFK. I remember JFK. He was very handsome and died tragically. Other than that, his sins make Hillary look like an angel!
Am I the only one who chuckles when "Cat Lady" says we should vote for an old woman over a young, vibrant, dynamic new leader?
He is very young and full of unproven rhetoric. He needs to get some age and experience before he runs for president.
Teddy Roosevelt was 42 when he became president. Franklin Roosevelt 51. JFK 43. Bill Clinton 46.
Each of these presidents are highly regarded today as successful and historic leaders. So tell me, exactly where does it say in the constitution that being old is equal to being ready?
Oh you kids crack me up! Tell me, what has Obama been the vibrant leader of? Don't vote for promises, he does not have the power or support to get the work done. Actually, he reminds me of Jimmy Carter. Now that is a sad story! Wonderful man, no support on the hill, and no experience playing with the big boys (or girls). Hillary an old woman? Yea, maybe she is. And I roamed the earth with the dinosaurs. Have you ever noticed that older people are proud of their experience? We can just sit and wait.
Oh, when I was young...but I don't think I was gullible. Have you noticed that Obama targeted the young, college age voter? It has been his campaign strategy. He has thrown alot of money at you people. THAT IS WHY YOU THINK HE IS SO GREAT!!
The biggest problem with Obama is that he has alot of ideas but no way to get the work done. He could be stopped at every idea. I bet the GOP is giving money to the Obama campaign. Win or loose the presidency, with Obama in there, the GOP would win.
You actually believe Republicans would rather run against Obama than Hillary "Whitewater/Travelgate/Filegate" Clinton? You have got to be kidding me! We're one blowjob joke away from President John McCain if Hillary gets the nomination.
Gee, let me see, yea. I really think that the republicans would rather run against Obama.
I don't understand what you mean by your last sentence. Perhaps you could re-word it.
Sure, I can rephrase, with a little help from Mitt Romney: "The idea of Bill Clinton back in the White House with nothing to do is something I just can't imagine."
If you think Hillary can shed the Monika Lewinsky scandal as an issue in the general, you're foolish or dotty. Republicans can beat Hillary not by convincing the country she's unfit, but by convincing the country that it isn't worth the bother to live through four more years of scandal and embarrassment. In other words, all the Republicans need to beat Hillary are some blowjob jokes on late night television.
Anyway, I'm done with this debate. Clearly your support of Hillary has no rational basis beyond ageist prejudice against Obama since you've failed to give a single substantive reason she'd be a better president.
I'm glad you responded and sorry to see you leave the discussion. I will have to tell my son that I was called "dotty." We love the old Margaret Rutherford Miss Marple movies. I disagree with your logic behind the blow job jokes. I think that this is a very serious time for us and there will be good that comes out of this election.
@ Cat Lady:
Wow. As a college student, I find that really offensive. As a Finance/Economics major at one of the most prestigious colleges in New Jersey, I'd be willing to bet that I'm smarter than a good number of Americans. If not, I have the resources to get smarter. I've spent a great deal of college time, both in-class and extracurricular, researching candidates, watching debates, and doing a lot of learning to just make sure I don't just endorse a candidate blindly.
There is no conceit in your family - you have it all! I am not from the east. I am from the mid-west. I am not impressed with what schools you have attended and what classes you have taken. You are one of millions and millions of college students. Hopefully you will graduate! Perhaps you are more like obama than I thought. All talk, no accomplishments. And yes, my lad - grades are NOT LIFE ACCOMPLISHMENTS. For all of your education, you completely miss understood my comment: Good will come out of this election. Yes, I am dotty.
Perhaps you should be studying while you are in class rather than researching candidates. Good old fashioned hard work is better than all of the speculation in the world. If Hillary does not get the democratic nomination, I will be voting for McCain. At least he is OLD ENOUGH to know his way around a room. Obama is alot of HOT AIR!
Meanwhile Thursday, the Clinton campaign asked Obama to debate once a week, but he demurred.
Good thinking on his part. The Clinton camp wanted to tie him up with debate prep so he couldn't get out and meet the people. They know that as a "clean and articulate" guy he relates very well when one-on-one with people and they want to take him out of that comfort zone.
Some senior staffers on her campaign also are voluntarily forgoing paychecks as the campaign heads into the next round of contests.
Is there even such a thing as forgoing a paycheck voluntarily? Go Obama!
Clinton, with less money to spend and less confident of her prospects in the February contests, will instead concentrate on Ohio and Texas, large states with primaries March 4 and where polling shows her with a significant lead.
What polling is that, pray tell?
Here in Philadelphia, I won't be voting until April. Hillary needs about $50M to get there and I'm sure she'll find it. This a unique opportunity for "investors" to buy into a Clinton administration. It's very rare that a "front-runner" is in such dire need of help. Let's hope she doesn't mortgage our future to win.
The Hillary spin never ends. The truth is that she looked like death warmed over as she tried to spin Super Tuesday into some kind of victory for herself. Clearly, Barack Obama took the heart of the country and will continue to do so. And the fact that he can raise $7M only two days after Super Tuesday does not bode well for Hillary Clinton. And if she isn't having financial troubles, then why make her staff go without pay? It doesn't add up--just like all of her other claims and spin. None of her positions really add up.
Obama will get the Dem nom in 2008 and hopefully Hillary will just fade away forever.
Clinton is an idiot if she really thinks that having to pour her own money and short change campaign workers saleries doesn't mean that her campaign isn't having financial difficulties. Her campaign has to be going really bad if she's having to do that. I think that Clinton has no chance compared to Obama.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |