Yahoo Board to Spurn $44B Microsoft Bid

advertisement

SAN FRANCISCO — Yahoo Inc.'s board will reject Microsoft Corp.'s $44.6 billion takeover bid after concluding the unsolicited offer undervalues the slumping Internet pioneer, a person familiar with the situation said Saturday.

The decision could provoke a showdown between two of the world's most prominent technology companies with Internet search leader Google Inc. looming in the background. Leery of Microsoft expanding its turf on the Internet, Google already has offered to help Yahoo avert a takeover and urged antitrust regulators to take a hard look at the proposed deal.

If the world's largest software maker wants Yahoo badly enough, Microsoft could try to override Yahoo's board by taking its offer — originally valued at $31 per share — directly to the shareholders. Pursuing that risky route probably will require Microsoft to attempt to oust Yahoo's current 10-member board.

Alternatively, Microsoft could sweeten its bid. Many analysts believe Microsoft is prepared to offer as much as $35 per share for Yahoo, which still boasts one of the Internet's largest audiences and most powerful advertising vehicles despite a prolonged slump that has hammered its stock.

Yahoo's board reached the decision after exploring a wide variety of alternatives during the past week, according to the person who spoke to The Associated Press. The person didn't want to be identified because the reasons for Yahoo's rebuff won't be officially spelled out until Monday morning.

Microsoft and Yahoo declined to comment Saturday on the decision, first reported by The Wall Street Journal on its Web site.

Yahoo's board concluded Microsoft's offer is inadequate even though the company couldn't find any other potential bidders willing to offer a higher price.

Without other suitors on the horizon, Yahoo has had little choice but to turn a cold shoulder toward Microsoft if the board hopes to fulfill its responsibility to fetch the highest price possible for the company, said technology investment banker Ken Marlin.

"You would expect Yahoo's board to reject Microsoft at first," Marlin said. "If they didn't, they would be accused of malfeasance."

But by spurning Microsoft, Yahoo risks further alienating shareholders already upset about management missteps that have led to five consecutive quarters of declining profits.

The downturn caused Yahoo's stock price to plummet by more than 40 percent, erasing about $20 billion in shareholder wealth, in the three months leading up to Microsoft's bid.

Seizing on an opportunity to expand its clout on the Internet, Microsoft dangled a takeover offer that was 62 percent above Yahoo's stock price of just $19.18 when the bid was announced Feb. 1. Yahoo shares ended the past week at $29.20.

Led by company co-founder and board member Jerry Yang, Yahoo now will be under intense pressure to lay out a strategy that will prevent its stock price from collapsing again. What's more, Yang and the rest of the management team must convince Wall Street that they can boost Yahoo's market value beyond Microsoft's offer.

Yahoo's shares traded at $31 as recently as November, but have eroded steadily amid concerns about the slowing economy and frustration with the slow pace of a turnaround that Yang promised last June when he replaced former movie studio mogul Terry Semel as Yahoo's chief executive officer.

This isn't the first time that Yahoo has spurned Microsoft. The Redmond, Wash.-based company offered $40 per share to buy Yahoo a year ago only to be shooed away by Semel, according to a person familiar with the matter. The person didn't want to be identified because that bid was never made public.

Yahoo now may want that Microsoft to raise its price to at least $40 per share again. That would force Microsoft to raise its current offer by about $12 billion — a high price that might alarm its own shareholders.

Microsoft's stock price already has slid 12 percent since the company announced its Yahoo bid, reflecting concerns about the deal bogging down amid potential management distractions, sagging employee morale and other headaches that frequently arise when two big companies are combined.

Although it isn't involved directly in the deal, Google is the main reason Yahoo is being pursued by Microsoft.

Yahoo has struggled largely because it hasn't been able to target online ads as effectively as Google.

Microsoft believes Yahoo's brand, engineers, audience and services will provide the company with valuable weapons in its so far unsuccessful attempt to narrow Google's huge lead in the lucrative Internet search and advertising markets.

As it examined ways to thwart Microsoft, Yahoo considered an advertising partnership with Google — an alliance long favored by analysts who believe it would boost the profits of both companies. It was unclear Saturday if Yahoo's plans for boosting its stock price include a Google partnership, which would probably face antitrust issues.

A Microsoft takeover of Yahoo would also be scrutinized by antitrust regulators in the United States and Europe. The antitrust uncertainties could be cited as one of the reasons that Yahoo's board decided to spurn Microsoft.

___

On the Net:

Yahoo: http://info.yahoo.com/

Microsoft: http://www.microsoft.com

  • 16 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
13
2.3
{"commentId":1452325,"authorDomain":"doubledemon"}

I can't believe this. How could Yahoo be so stupid? This was a way over book value offer and they blew it.

{"commentId":1452325,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"doubledemon"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Feb 9, 2008 2:25 PM EST
{"commentId":1452362,"authorDomain":"ottawahitech"}
othDeleted
{"commentId":1452404,"authorDomain":"chill888"}

irresponsible - and just ego. They are required to act in their shareholder's best interests and the premium is so large.

{"commentId":1452404,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"chill888"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#3 - Sat Feb 9, 2008 2:46 PM EST
{"commentId":1452727,"authorDomain":"doubledemon"}

Roger that. Yahoo has too much ego/pride. Fools.

{"commentId":1452727,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"doubledemon"}
  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Sat Feb 9, 2008 4:50 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":1452474,"authorDomain":"jaybutler"}

If I were a Yahoo! shareholder, I would be livid. Yang better have some trick up his sleeve to get that additional "value" to be reflected in the stock price.

If Microsoft wants it badly enough, they could just turn this into a true hostile takeover attempt (with all the requisite hostility).

{"commentId":1452474,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"jaybutler"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:16 PM EST
{"commentId":1452734,"authorDomain":"doubledemon"}

Well, it is a good negotiation tactic. Ask for the moon and see what you get. I think that Microsoft expected Yahoo to jump at this. Yahoo's stock price has been trending downward and this was the boost they needed. I will be interested to see what happens to the price on Monday. I think Microsoft will make a second offer but not $40/share.

{"commentId":1452734,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"doubledemon"}
  • 1 vote
#4.1 - Sat Feb 9, 2008 4:53 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":1454852,"authorDomain":"adamkemp"}

Their 52-week high is 34.08, and most stocks are down right now. The board is right. Microsoft is trying to buy them up while they're cheap. Yahoo! is worth a lot, and Microsoft can certainly afford to make a better offer. The best interests of the shareholders are served by trying to get Microsoft to pay a fair price, not by letting them take advantage of a slump in the market.

{"commentId":1454852,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"adamkemp"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:49 PM EST
{"commentId":1455231,"authorDomain":"doubledemon"}

If the 52 wk High is 34.08 that means it has been lower than that for a lot more weeks. Yahoo thinks they are going to get there again some time soon they are sorely mistaken. If you look at the stock over the past year (prior to the MSFT bid) the stock has been trending downward. If you back it up to three years it is trending downward. In fact if you look at Yahoo's stock over the past four years it has been stagnant. So, I guess if there is some miracle that they have up their sleeve they might be worth $35/share but I think Yahoo is doomed in the long term without a company like MSFT. They cannot compete with Google without a big partner like MSFT. I would say that the MSFT bid was a fair value for the stock, maybe even slightly over valued. But hopefully MSFT comes back with $35 and Yahoo jumps on board.

I think Yahoo made a calculation that MSFT was willing to pay more and this is their first negotiation on the price. We will see what happens.

{"commentId":1455231,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"doubledemon"}
  • 2 votes
#5.1 - Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:59 PM EST
{"commentId":1455558,"authorDomain":"adamkemp"}

If you look at the NASDAQ in general you'll find that most stocks have been trending down. Just because Yahoo! is low now does not mean that they're not worth more than what MS is offering. Yahoo! is not going out of business, and Microsoft knows that they bring a lot to the table. That's why they're interested in buying it. I have no doubt at all that Yahoo! will be back up that high in the future.

They cannot compete with Google without a big partner like MSFT.

They already are. That's the point. That's what Microsoft wants from them. Yahoo! isn't beating Google, sure, but they are staying in the game, and there are areas in which Yahoo! has done better.

{"commentId":1455558,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"adamkemp"}
    #5.2 - Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:40 PM EST
    {"commentId":1455848,"authorDomain":"doubledemon"}

    Actually you are wrong, the Nasdaq has not been trending down for three years, in fact it has been trending upward for 5 years.

    Yahoo's stock price was under $25/share in January of 2004. In January of 2008 it was under $25/share.

    In between that period it reached a high of $42/share in January of '06. It fell the whole year. It then fell again last year. So, where is the upside to this stock? It is at the same price it was 4 years ago, and for the past two years it has been sinking. Even if it is going to go up, it is unlikely that it will get back to $42/share this year, or even the following year.

    {"commentId":1455848,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"doubledemon"}
    • 2 votes
    #5.3 - Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:20 PM EST
    {"commentId":1458826,"authorDomain":"adamkemp"}

    I was not looking at the last 5 years. I was looking at the last one year, which is in the time span at which Yahoo! had been up higher. I still think they're worth more than what Microsoft is offering, and I would still argue that it is in the shareholders' best interests for Yahoo!'s board to push MS higher.

    {"commentId":1458826,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"adamkemp"}
    • 1 vote
    #5.4 - Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:01 PM EST
    {"commentId":1459161,"authorDomain":"doubledemon"}

    I agree it is in the interest to fire a counter offer but if the deal doesn't go through they will lose the battle with Google in the long run IMO.

    {"commentId":1459161,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"doubledemon"}
    • 2 votes
    #5.5 - Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:13 PM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":1458802,"authorDomain":"northernoregon"}

    I am on the fence. Yahoo is going to know quite a bit more on what is happening behind the scenes than we are, their stock price is not at it's premium. Over time I think their over all value is going to be going up considerably. I think Yahoo for the most part made a sensible decision, if they handle it smartly. I don't think Microsoft would have made an offer that would be the top they're willing to spend on Yahoo. There is room for negotiation and I think it was smart of Yahoo to hold out for more.

    {"commentId":1458802,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"northernoregon"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#6 - Mon Feb 11, 2008 2:55 PM EST
    {"commentId":1459165,"authorDomain":"doubledemon"}

    Agreed but if they killed the deal it was a bad move.

    {"commentId":1459165,"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518","authorDomain":"doubledemon"}
    • 2 votes
    #6.1 - Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:14 PM EST
    Reply
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"216570","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"216570","contentId":"1289518"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking