Log In | Register
25 Comments
Printadvertisement
NEW YORK — NBC News is apologizing again — this time for Jane Fonda. The 70-year-old actress used a vulgar slang term on the "Today" show Thursday while talking about the play "The Vagina Monologues." Fonda is appearing in a 10th-anniversary performance and was on "Today" with author Eve Ensler.
Fonda told co-host Meredith Vieira that she was asked to perform a monologue with a slang term for vagina as the title — and Fonda used the term itself on the air in explaining why she said "no."
"I said, `I don't think so, I've got enough problems,'" Fonda said.
About 10 minutes later, Vieira told viewers that Fonda had used a word from the play that normally isn't used on television.
"It was a slip and obviously she apologizes and so do we," Vieira said. "We would do nothing to offend the audience, so please accept that apology."
"Today" moved quickly to silence the word and cover up Fonda's face with a still photo when the show was aired in the Midwest, Mountain and West Coast feeds.
It's been a month's worth of apologies for NBC News, owned by General Electric Co. MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews said he was sorry for suggesting that the reason Hillary Clinton was a presidential candidate was because of her husband's infidelities. MSNBC correspondent David Shuster was suspended for two weeks for saying the Clintons had "pimped out" daughter Chelsea for presidential campaigning.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
21 Votes- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Published to:
- Associated Press's Column, All of Newsvine
- Groups: none
- Regions: New York
- Public Discussion (25)
- Public Discussion (0)
What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user
has on the current conversation.
The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd
row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera).
Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group
is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the
left, in their corresponding group.
Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the
number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative
one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their
relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
11
7.3
2.2
{"commentId":1470229,"authorDomain":"tromba"}
Yep, I couldn't believe she used that word this morning. I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall in the control booth when she said it.
{"commentId":1470229,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"tromba"}
- 1 vote
#1 - Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:33 PM EST{"commentId":1471062,"authorDomain":"PeterMerel"}
Was it "vajayjay"? I thought women who used that word were supposed to be heroes now?
If it was some other word - well, what's the big difference between one word for a body part and another?
{"commentId":1471062,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"PeterMerel"}
- 1 vote
{"commentId":1470299,"authorDomain":"brianford"}
What a worthless article. Someone who doesn't know what she said (me, basically) gets absolutely nothing out of this.
{"commentId":1470299,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"brianford"}
- 9 votes
#2 - Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:47 PM EST{"commentId":1470323,"authorDomain":"jeremyemalheim"}
And really, is Jane Fonda newsworthy anymore?
{"commentId":1470323,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"jeremyemalheim"}
- 2 votes
{"commentId":1470342,"authorDomain":"finalcut"}
I'd bet she used a different term for vagina but, like you, i don't really know what she said.
{"commentId":1470342,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"finalcut"}
- 2 votes
{"commentId":1470443,"authorDomain":"jyuma"}
Brian Ford
What a worthless article.
Absolutely agree, this is how the AP handles "controversial" stuff.
{"commentId":1470443,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"jyuma"}
- 3 votes
{"commentId":1470459,"authorDomain":"finalcut"}
oh the horror! Not the 'C' word - ahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
{"commentId":1470459,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"finalcut"}
- 3 votes
{"commentId":1470532,"authorDomain":"davidmcgirr"}
Hurrah! My favourite expletive.
-Dave
{"commentId":1470532,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"davidmcgirr"}
- 5 votes
{"commentId":1470450,"authorDomain":"media"}
A quick Google News search indicates that the vulgar slang in question was, in fact, the C-word.
Cookie? I was always taught that C is for cookie.
{"commentId":1470450,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"media"}
- 7 votes
#3 - Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:16 PM EST{"commentId":1470584,"authorDomain":"lunartick"}
That's good enough for me.
{"commentId":1470584,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"lunartick"}
- 10 votes
{"commentId":1470589,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
Oh, I LOVE the "c" word. It's awesome and powerful.
{"commentId":1470589,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 5 votes
{"commentId":1470651,"authorDomain":"damiankd"}
Oh, I LOVE the "c" word. It's awesome and powerful.
It's like a language grenade -- pull the pin, toss it into the conversation and get the heck outta there.
{"commentId":1470651,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"damiankd"}
- 7 votes
{"commentId":1470847,"authorDomain":"jrubinic"}
If you make it to 70 or beyond, I think you should be able to use whatever words you want!
I know I'm looking forward to that. Of course I have about 40 or so years to go...
{"commentId":1470847,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"jrubinic"}
- 7 votes
#4 - Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:48 PM EST{"commentId":1470880,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
If you make it to 70 or beyond, I think you should be able to use whatever words you want!
Good point.
{"commentId":1470880,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 5 votes
{"commentId":1471038,"authorDomain":"vincentgrayson"}
You pretty much can...just claim you're going senile, you don't realize what you were saying, or something else similar. I can't wait.
{"commentId":1471038,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"vincentgrayson"}
- 2 votes
{"commentId":1470988,"authorDomain":"deb193"}
Well, I guess there is a male and female c-word. Only I am pretty sure I hear colorful characters in prime-time dramas saying (c*ck s*ckers) all the time. Seems like a double standard.
Its just funny. We don't appreciate the word used in a derogatory or prurient way, so we even ban it in discussions of what words can be problematic. This in a way insures we perpetuate the dark/dirty/hidden power of the word. Heck, it is not just genitals, even news stories about someone getting in trouble for making a racial slur trip over themselves and say things like N-word. This practice elevates the word to a place of power and completely hides the fact that it is the nasty intent of the speaker that is really at issue - not a spoken word.
There was good reason for vagina to come out of the verbal closet, and you could make the case for other genital words to come out too.
{"commentId":1470988,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"deb193"}
- 2 votes
#5 - Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:29 PM EST{"commentId":1471100,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
Seems like a double standard
Yep. Welcome to 21st Century America. LOL
{"commentId":1471100,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 2 votes
{"commentId":1471198,"authorDomain":"darkknightjrk"}
Wow--for once she's in trouble for something she doesn't deserve! :D
Seriously, so what? It's just a word. It's the morning, for Christ's sake--if you pull open the blinds, have the sun burn your eyes, and you DON'T say some swear word, you have anger issues and there's a good chance you'll someday snap and whack all your coworkers with a machine gun. :O
{"commentId":1471198,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"darkknightjrk"}
- 3 votes
#6 - Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:19 PM EST{"commentId":1471280,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}
Here we go again. I seeded a good piece about this - why must the media shield us from the actual word in question?
{"commentId":1471280,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
- 2 votes
#7 - Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:38 PM EST{"commentId":1471314,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}
If ever a segment deserved a tape delay it'd be one in which the topic was the vagina, don't you think?
{"commentId":1471314,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
- 2 votes
{"commentId":1471846,"authorDomain":"jimi"}
The Brit's don't seem to have an issue with it.
{"commentId":1471846,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"jimi"}
- 4 votes
{"commentId":1473719,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}
The Brits are much more open-minded - wouldnt be surprised if they used the word in a headline
{"commentId":1473719,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
- 1 vote
{"commentId":1473870,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
Especially since it was ACTUALLY the title of the piece. I use it when I'm talking about titles. Like Inga Musico's @!$%#.
{"commentId":1473870,"threadId":"219587","contentId":"1301473","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 2 votes
{"commentId":10405216,"authorDomain":"breelaboy"}
{"commentId":10429902,"authorDomain":"brianalampton"}
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"219587","isPrivate":false}
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
Start Tracking
Stop TrackingCOMPANY STUFF:
LEGAL STUFF:
- © 2005-2009 Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine is a property of
