SEATTLE — Microsoft Corp. will cut the price of some versions of Windows Vista, the software maker said late Thursday.
The move came a day after court filings revealed internal dissent over which Windows XP computers would be considered capable of running the new operating system — and a feeling on at least one executive's part that the company had "botched" the marketing of computers as "Vista Capable."
Only copies of the year-old operating system that are sold in boxes directly to consumers are affected by the price cuts — not the versions pre-loaded on personal computers. The cuts will range from 20 percent to 48 percent.
The reductions are to coincide with the late March release of Vista Service Pack 1, a collection of security fixes and other improvements.
Microsoft said the new prices will apply to the Home Premium and Ultimate versions of Vista, in both their full editions and the editions that upgrade an older or more basic operating system.
Both versions serve the tiny percentage of users who install an operating system on their own; most people get the latest version of Windows only when they buy a new PC.
Windows Vista's January 2007 launch was plagued by delays. To keep consumers buying PCs in the holiday season of 2006, Microsoft and PC makers promised free Vista upgrades later to shoppers who bought Windows XP computers.
At the launch, Microsoft was widely criticized for offering too many versions of the operating system — including Home Basic, which didn't have the snazzy new signature look called "Aero" — and for setting the price too high for the high-end versions.
Brad Brooks, a corporate vice president for Windows marketing at Microsoft, said in an interview that the company has since tested lower prices and found "product was moving much, much faster."
Brooks said he expects so many customers to buy Vista at the new prices that the price cuts will increase Microsoft's revenue, not subtract from it.
A federal judge recently said consumers could pursue a class action suit against Microsoft for labeling PCs as "Vista Capable," even though many were not powerful enough to run all of Vista's features, including the Aero interface.
Company e-mails produced in court chronicle Microsoft settling on a plan to market a wide range of XP-based PCs as "Vista Capable" after company officials realized in early 2006 that 30 percent or fewer of computers on the market could run the full-fledged version of Vista with Aero.
That realization apparently caused computer makers like Dell Inc. to worry that people would stop buying PCs for almost a year — until Vista launched.
The e-mails also showed Microsoft lowering the bar for "Vista Capable" to protect Intel Corp.'s sales of some widely used chips that weren't powerful enough for the full Vista experience.
Microsoft employee Anantha Kancherla was particularly blunt in his March 2006 response to a question about whether a certain PC configuration would be considered "Vista Capable."
"Based on objective criteria that exist today for "capable," even a piece of junk will qualify," he wrote. "For the sake of Vista customers, it will be a complete tragedy if we allowed it."
According to the e-mails, Jim Allchin, the executive in charge of Windows at the time, wasn't involved in the decision to brand a wide swath of XP computers as "Vista Capable."
Upon learning the details, Allchin wrote, "We really botched this."
A year too late.. finally , a good move from Micro$oft. I'm still not buying it.
Windows Vista?? Please worst Operating system ever! Stick with XP for now, but they will drop support of XP sometime in 2009.
And why do you need that? I mean Support!
Here's my thinking to people that need to eventually buy a new machine ... If you are a Windows user on XP with an outdated machine you're going to have to upgrade to a new machine sooner or later. Vista is not XP. OS X is not XP. In short, you're going to have to learn something new. Why learn the new Vista OS with all these known problems when you can learn OS X that not only runs MS Office but also your email, your web browsing and most importantly your digital life.
Everyone in the tech community make a note of the date Microsoft stops supporting XP. You are going to see a huge backlash on them with people screaming and kicking and doing all they can to avoid having to go to Vista. Even more will jump ship to Apple or Linux.
Actually, I've been using Vista Ultimate for just over a year now, and have yet to have any issues ... and I do web work including video editing.
For XP fans, here's a trip down memory lane. Vista was released as a much more solid OS than was XP.
For corporate clients, compatibility with existing legacy applications is an issue, which are being solved on a daily basis.
being solved on a daily basis.
Translation - Vista still does not work completely.
Translation - Vista still does not work completely.
Incorrect. The major problems are applications created with non-Microsoft technologies (Sun Java for example) that exploit security "holes" and "undocumented features" in the XP architecture to operate. Companies such as Adobe have stepped up and release upgraded software (like Flash player) that behaves properly in Vista' more security-driven environment.
Vista does work properly. Microsoft can take no responsibility for updating to accommodate third-party software (even though it does on a regular basis,) and now its up to third-part vendors to bring their software up to the security standards established in Vista.
Security is a core of Vista, based on user complaints that have been circulating for the last few years about this aspect of MS's operating systems. You can't have more security without expecting that there will be some incompatibility.
Vista still does not work on machines that MS said it WOULD work on. It still does not work.
One does not solve problems unless it has been declared a problem.
Vista still does not work on machines that MS said it WOULD work on. It still does not work.
Which machines? Were they manufactured by Microsoft?
The Ready for Vista certification indicates that the machine will handle Vista Basic. Not the Business version and certainly not Ultimate. Baseline hardware requirements for all versions (including tested hardware and driver components) were available before Vista even launched.
Unfortunately, many people were confused by this and rightly so. It was quite an oversight when Microsoft announced the Ready for Vista certification program. However, vendors (who sell machines based on processors, bus speed and hard drives) did know the difference and still advertised machines as such making no further delineation. So the ball is not completely in Microsoft's court.
If a vendor advertises a machine Ready for Vista and it really isn't, that's hardly Microsoft's fault.
Dell, Gateway and other manufacturers had to offer XP on machines that would not RUN Vista.
Dell, Gateway and other manufacturers had to offer XP on machines that would not RUN Vista.
You mean Dell and others built machines that would not run Vista? Whose fault is that?
In any case, these vendors offered the XP as an option due to consumer demand. Dell even offers Ubuntu Linux as an option for customers with that preference.
My Dell Dimension runs Vista Ultimate just great, thanks.
You must work for Microsoft. There were many machines that were designated by the Microsoft software that simply did not run the OS. Dell and others built machines according to specifications given to them by MS on which it did not work. They followed MS specifications.
In any case, these vendors offered the XP as an option due to consumer demand. Dell even offers Ubuntu Linux as an option for customers with that preference.
And it took a multi-state and international law suit against Microsoft before this could happen.
You mustn't be that old. Once upon a time companies like Compaq and Toshiba were threatened by your friend Microsoft with a supply chain embargo if the didn't ship MS Windows with each piece of hardware that left their factories. In other words, if Tosbhiba shipped laptops with Linux instead of Windows or if Compaq shipped versions of Windows with Netscape, Microsoft threatened to stop shipping them copies of Windows all together.
Microsoft was known to be evil company. The EU finds tons of fault with them. Watch Cranky Greeks (episode 104) and listen to the lovely remarks about Balmer.
i like vista i need install vebcam how to do it
need install vista webcam
rizvi, are you trying to install an older webcam, or a new one?
If older, check the webcam manufacturer for the Vista drivers. Unfortunately, many manufacturers still have not caught up with Vista drivers for older cams.
Most new ones work, though. This one isn't bad...
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |