Western Antarctic Ice Chunk Collapses

advertisement

WASHINGTON — A chunk of Antarctic ice about seven times the size of Manhattan suddenly collapsed, putting an even greater portion of glacial ice at risk, scientists said Tuesday.

Satellite images show the runaway disintegration of a 160-square-mile chunk in western Antarctica, which started Feb. 28. It was the edge of the Wilkins ice shelf and has been there for hundreds, maybe 1,500 years.

This is the result of global warming, said British Antarctic Survey scientist David Vaughan.

Because scientists noticed satellite images within hours, they diverted satellite cameras and even flew an airplane over the ongoing collapse for rare pictures and video.

"It's an event we don't get to see very often," said Ted Scambos, lead scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo. "The cracks fill with water and slice off and topple... That gets to be a runaway situation."

While icebergs naturally break away from the mainland, collapses like this are unusual but are happening more frequently in recent decades, Vaughan said. The collapse is similar to what happens to hardened glass when it is smashed with a hammer, he said.

The rest of the Wilkins ice shelf, which is about the size of Connecticut, is holding on by a narrow beam of thin ice. Scientists worry that it too may collapse. Larger, more dramatic ice collapses occurred in 2002 and 1995.

Vaughan had predicted the Wilkins shelf would collapse about 15 years from now. The part that recently gave way makes up about 4 percent of the overall shelf, but it's an important part that can trigger further collapse.

There's still a chance the rest of the ice shelf will survive until next year because this is the end of the Antarctic summer and colder weather is setting in, Vaughan said.

Scientists said they are not concerned about a rise in sea level from the latest event, but say it's a sign of worsening global warming.

Such occurrences are "more indicative of a tipping point or trigger in the climate system," said Sarah Das, a scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

"These are things that are not re-forming," Das said. "So once they're gone, they're gone."

Climate in Antarctica is complicated and more isolated from the rest of the world.

Much of the continent is not warming and some parts are even cooling, Vaughan said. However, the western peninsula, which includes the Wilkins ice shelf, juts out into the ocean and is warming. This is the part of the continent where scientists are most concern about ice-melt triggering sea level rise.

___

On the Net:

The National Snow and Ice Data Center: http://nsidc.org

The British Antarctic Survey: http://www.bas.ac.uk/

  • 25 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
8.2
3.9
{"commentId":1619107,"authorDomain":"foolishgeorge"}

We are now seeing words like 'runaway disintegration' and 'indicative of a tipping point or trigger in the climate system'. Drip, drip, drip and away it goes.

{"commentId":1619107,"threadId":"239934","contentId":"1389355","authorDomain":"foolishgeorge"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:30 PM EDT
{"commentId":1619688,"authorDomain":"npat"}
The rest of the Wilkins ice shelf, which is about the size of Connecticut, is holding on by a narrow beam of thin ice. Scientists worry that it too may collapse.

Bears watching don't ya think?

{"commentId":1619688,"threadId":"239934","contentId":"1389355","authorDomain":"npat"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:45 PM EDT
{"commentId":1619794,"authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}

We knew this was coming, so we should not be that shocked -- but my impression is that they did not expect this collapse until maybe 2010, 2020 something like that.
Quite a shocker, and this ought to be a date to remember.

{"commentId":1619794,"threadId":"239934","contentId":"1389355","authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#3 - Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:27 PM EDT
{"commentId":1620053,"authorDomain":"foolishgeorge"}

It's not the event that is shocking per se. To me, the change in language used to describe the event is a sign that people at Woods Hole and the other big labs are really starting to worry. Once some of the potential feedback mechanisms trip, this could get worser and worser faster and faster.

{"commentId":1620053,"threadId":"239934","contentId":"1389355","authorDomain":"foolishgeorge"}
  • 4 votes
#3.1 - Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:03 PM EDT
{"commentId":1620235,"authorDomain":"figuresofstick"}

It's more of the fact that it happened sooner than predicted meaning that something is changing quicker than expected. Information about these things is being updated daily so it is quite easily to make a prediction that happens sooner or later than predicted.

{"commentId":1620235,"threadId":"239934","contentId":"1389355","authorDomain":"figuresofstick"}
  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:14 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1620217,"authorDomain":"kroderick"}

A big "told you so" to the "natural cycle" people.

{"commentId":1620217,"threadId":"239934","contentId":"1389355","authorDomain":"kroderick"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:06 PM EDT
{"commentId":1620239,"authorDomain":"figuresofstick"}

It is a "natural cycle". But the entire cycle is being sped up by a lot of contributing factors throughout the entire world.

{"commentId":1620239,"threadId":"239934","contentId":"1389355","authorDomain":"figuresofstick"}
  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:15 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1621630,"authorDomain":"npat"}
There's still a chance the rest of the ice shelf will survive until next year because this is the end of the Antarctic summer and colder weather is setting in, Vaughan said.

Maybe.

In a related article:

"If there is a little bit more retreat, this last 'ice buttress' could collapse and we'd likely lose about half the total ice shelf area in the next few years."

http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Antarctic_Ice_Shelf_Disintegrating_As_Result_Of_Climate_Change_999.html

{"commentId":1621630,"threadId":"239934","contentId":"1389355","authorDomain":"npat"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"239934","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"239934","contentId":"1389355"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking