FDA to Seek More Safety Data on Stents

advertisement

WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday laid out new guidelines for the testing of drug-coated stents, more than two years after safety concerns curtailed use of the devices.

The proposed guidelines posted to FDA's Web site recommend device makers conduct large, analytic studies of their stents both before and after they are submitted to FDA.

In its most rigorous recommendation, FDA said companies should be prepared to track patients for up to five years after their stents are approved to monitor blood clots, heart attack and other potentially fatal events. Such long-term studies can cost companies millions of dollars.

Stents are tiny, mesh-wire tubes that prop open arteries after they have been surgically cleared of fatty plaque. They quickly became a highly lucrative business, after companies began adding drug coatings to the devices in 2003 to prevent scar tissue from growing over the mesh-wire.

But after data suggested that the drug coatings may put patients at higher risk of blood clots, sales have plummeted to about $2 billion from a peak of $3.1 billion in 2005.

A series of studies in 2006 showed that months after they are implanted, stent coatings can increase the risk of life-threatening blood clots unless patients continue to take anti-clotting drugs. Medical societies urge patients to continue taking the drugs for at least a year after implantation.

FDA guidelines are not legally binding, but companies typically follow them to ensure approval of their devices. The agency will take comments on the proposed guidelines for four months before redrafting them and issuing final guidelines.

FDA has cleared three drug-coated stents: Boston Scientific Corp.'s Taxus, Medtronic Inc.'s Endeavor and Johnson & Johnson's Cypher.

About 650,000 patients in the U.S. have drug-coated stents.

  • 1 Vote
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.5
{"commentId":1633391,"authorDomain":"Spaman"}

This is a new area to me, but the technology sounds great - the only question I have is over FDA involvement ... are they doing what's right for patients or for drug companies

{"commentId":1633391,"threadId":"241977","contentId":"1391427","authorDomain":"Spaman"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:14 AM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"241977","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"241977","contentId":"1391427"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking