WASHINGTON — Democratic Sen. Barack Obama has seized on a key feature of voters' economic concerns — rising fuel prices — and is casting himself as the candidate who could bring about energy independence because he is not beholden to energy companies.
Last week, Obama aired a television ad in Pennsylvania called "Nothing's changed" that outlines his energy proposals while declaring, "I don't take money from oil companies or Washington lobbyists, and I won't let them block change anymore."
THE SPIN: In his ad, Obama states: "Since the gas lines of the '70's, Democrats and Republicans have talked about energy independence, but nothing's changed except now Exxon's making $40 billion a year, and we're paying $3.50 for gas. ... I don't take money from oil companies or Washington lobbyists, and I won't let them block change anymore. They'll pay a penalty on windfall profits. We'll invest in alternative energy, create jobs and free ourselves from foreign oil."
The Clinton campaign last week accused Obama of "false advertising."
"Senator Obama says he doesn't take campaign contributions from oil companies but the reality is that Exxon, Shell, and others are among his donors," Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said.
THE FACTS: True enough, Obama does not take money from oil companies. No candidate does. It is illegal for corporations to give money to politicians. Corporations, however, do have political action committees that collect voluntary donations from employees and then donate them to candidates. Obama doesn't take money from PACs. He also doesn't take money from lobbyists.
But he does accept money from executives and other employees of oil companies and two of his fundraisers are oil company executives. As of Feb. 29, Obama's presidential campaign had received nearly $214,000 from oil and gas industry employees and their families, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. Clinton had received nearly $307,000 from industry workers and their families and Republican Sen. John McCain, the likely GOP presidential nominee, received nearly $394,000, according to the center's totals.
Two of Obama's fundraisers are Robert Cavnar, the chairman and chief executive of Houston-based Mission Resources Corp., and George Kaiser, the president and CEO of Tulsa-based Kaiser-Francis Oil Co.
In January and February alone, Obama received nearly $18,000 from Exxon Mobil workers, according to Federal Election Commission records. Most of the donations were of $250 or less; the money came from workers ranging from executives to engineers to geologists to shift supervisors. Overall, he has raised about $34,000 from Exxon Mobil workers since the beginning of his campaign. Exxon Mobil employees have given Clinton about $16,000 since the beginning of last year.
___
By Jim Kuhnhenn
Please. Exxon is a massive company. It's more than likely that some Exxon employees just happen to support Obama. That doesn't mean they represent the company.
The executives part is a little sketchier, but don't try to tell us taking money from employees in the oil industry is anything like taking money from the industry itself.
I have to agree. I would hate to find out Obama took contributions for major oil corporations, but employees are voters and can contribute as they wish.
hahaha, that amount is like nothing compared to what he has raised and very little compared to what other candidates have gotten from companies, special interests and more.
i agree, i'm glad it's being put out there. as far as the clinton aide calling it false advertising, it would take more than 30 seconds for him to explain what a PAC is. that isn't even the moral of the commercial. the moral of the commercial is that he won't be in debt to companies, thus letting change happen.
on the other hand, i can't help but think what would happen if this had happened to hillary. like it just seems like she would get torn apart if they found out that she diluted the truth a little bit. but she takes a bunch of money from companies so i don't have to worry about that. :)
Hillary torn apart? Never she is bruised but never broken. And she tears things apart. No matter what she is determined to win. Whether she cares or not that the Democrats could lose because of her relentlessness to win[ I don't think she's that heartless just competitive], she goes on nonetheless. No, what's tearing Hillary more than anything is Bill Clinton. As much as I like him, the fact that she didn't dump him kinda hurts her. Makes her look weak. Jon
Yes, because forgiveness is impossible for anyone. I used to think like that, until I realized that not everyone has the same ideas of relationships that I have.
But as for most of that, you've hit it.
How dare employees make donations... wait, everyone has to work somewhere to make money. I always find it a stretch to link employees to corporate agenda. It doesn't show how many, what position, and amount of personal donation. He doesn't accept any money for oil lobbyists or oil PACs, it would be pretty extreme to to filter out all employees.
To bring up Exxon is laughable, I remember some primary going on in the State of Texas the first week of March. I have a feeling more than just a couple of people who live in Texas work at Exxon Mobil.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |