Log In | Register
1 Comment
PrintComcast wants 'bill of rights' for file-sharers and ISPs
Tue Apr 15, 2008 3:59 PM EDT
advertisement
NEW YORK — Comcast Corp., under federal investigation for interfering with the traffic of its Internet subscribers, said Tuesday it wants to develop a "Bill of Rights and Responsibilities" for file sharing.
The announcement expands on Comcast's new policy toward file-sharing: It said last month that rather than singling out such traffic and blocking some of it, the company will move toward a system that treats all types the same.
File sharing is mainly used to illegally swap copyright works like movies, but it's also emerging as a cheap way to distribute legal video. One of the companies in this business, Pando Networks Inc., is joining Comcast and supporting the "Bill of Rights."
The document would codify "best practices" for Internet providers to deal with file-sharing traffic, which can place substantial loads on the networks of cable companies. It would also clarify what controls consumers should have over peer-to-peer (or P2P) file-sharing applications on their computers. Some of these applications are often designed to run in the background, and give the user little insight into what they're doing or how much resources they're using.
"By having this framework in place, we will help P2P companies, ISPs and content owners find common ground to support consumers who want to use P2P applications to deliver legal content," said Tony Werner, Comcast's chief technology officer.
Comcast has already said that it is working with another maker of file-sharing software, BitTorrent Inc., to figure out how ISPs and P2P companies can coexist peacefully.
Comcast spokesman Charlie Douglas said Tuesday's announcement is "another example of how we can work with the industry to solve these issues rather than getting the government involved." Regulation won't be able to keep up with the pace of change in the technology, he said.
The Federal Communications Commission is investigating complaints from consumer groups about Comcast's treatment of file-sharing traffic, and the commission chairman has said he's "pleased" that the company is moving to end its practice of stifling file-sharing.
Also Tuesday, Comcast said it would conduct tests with Pando's software on its network to figure out how to best deal with P2P traffic. Verizon Communications Inc. recently said that by sharing information with Pando, the companies simultaneously sped up file-sharing downloads for Verizon subscribers and reduced the strain on its network. However, file-sharing traffic places different burdens on Comcast and other cable ISPs, where neighbors share data capacity on the local cable lines.
Pando's software differs from the freewheeling, anonymous file-sharing networks that pirates use. It focuses on enabling transfers of large e-mail attachments, like home videos, between friends and family, and on delivering large video files from major media companies like TV networks.
___
On the Net:
© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
2 Votes- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Published to:
- Peter Svensson's Column, All of Newsvine
- Groups: none
- Regions: New York
 | Senators debate future of Web | Associated Press | Wed Apr 16 | 0 |
- Public Discussion (1)
- Public Discussion (0)
What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user
has on the current conversation.
The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd
row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera).
Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group
is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the
left, in their corresponding group.
Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the
number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative
one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their
relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.0
{"commentId":1695206,"authorDomain":"kylen"}
The whole debacle seems silly. ISP's sell access plans based on unlimited transfer and delineated by max speeds (or speed ranges). The obvious solution to the problem of excessive load is to change the plan terms to accommodate for the actual use. That is charge for transfer and speed.
Blocking some traffic or limiting it's transfer while selling unlimited transfer is fraud. Burying the restrictions inside a long EULA makes it at best deceptive advertising. Hiding behind a cover of anti-regulation is unethical. I am against most government regulation, however it is a legitimate use of government to enforce anti-fraud measures. That isn't regulation in the sense implied.
{"commentId":1695206,"threadId":"250622","contentId":"1432739","authorDomain":"kylen"}
- 2 votes
#1 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:59 PM EDT{"canLink":false,"threadId":"250622","isPrivate":false}
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
Start Tracking
Stop TrackingCOMPANY STUFF:
LEGAL STUFF:
- © 2005-2009 Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine is a property of
