Obama reports income of $4.2 million in 2007 tax returns

advertisement

PHILADELPHIA — Democratic Sen. Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, made $4.2 million last year as widespread interest in the presidential candidate pushed the sales of his two books.

In tax returns the campaign released Wednesday, the Obamas reported a significant jump in their income from the previous year as profits from the books "Dreams From My Father" and "The Audacity of Hope" accounted for some $4 million. The Obamas paid federal taxes of $1.4 million and donated $240,370 to charity.

Their salaried income was $260,735, which included his $157,102 salary as a U.S. senator and hers of $103,633 as vice president of community and external affairs at the University of Chicago Medical Center.

For part of 2007, Michelle Obama collected a salary for serving on the board of Westchester, Ill.-based TreeHouse Foods Inc., which produces pickles, nondairy powdered creamer and other products. She resigned in May after two years on the board.

The position had generated some complaints because TreeHouse is a supplier to Wal-Mart, and Barack Obama has criticized some of Wal-Mart's policies and treatment of employees.

The Obamas reported $29,443 from Treehouse Foods.

In 2006, Obama and his wife reported income of $991,296. The sum included Obama's Senate salary of $157,082 and his wife's earnings of $273,618 from her position as an administrator at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Michelle Obama also earned $51,200 in director's fees from TreeHouse Inc., a food distributor.

They paid $277,431 in federal taxes — an overpayment of $40,856, which they designated for estimated tax payments this year.

Among the charitable donations in 2007 was $26,270 to Trinity United Church of Christ, where the incendiary sermons of Obama's former pastor have created problems for the candidate. The Obamas' largest charitable donation was $50,000 to the United Negro College Fund. They also gave $35,000 to CARE.

The campaign released the returns just hours before a candidate debate with rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

By comparison, Clinton and her husband, the former president, reported $20.4 million in income for 2007. Almost half the former first couple's money came from Bill Clinton's speeches. The Clintons made nearly $109 million since leaving the White House in 2001, capitalizing on lucrative business ventures and his speaking engagements.

Likely Republican nominee Sen. John McCain has not released his tax returns for 2007. McCain is routinely ranked among the richest senators, but a prenuptial agreement has kept most assets in his wife's name. As heiress to her father's stake in Phoenix-based Hensley & Co., a beer distributor, Cindy McCain is an executive whose worth may exceed $100 million.

The release of the returns comes as Obama has fought criticism that his comments about bitter voters in small towns smack of elitism. Campaigning in Indiana on Wednesday, Michelle Obama rejected that characterization, pointing out that the couple were fortunate enough to pay off their academic loans because of her husband's two books.

Barack Obama graduated from Columbia University, Michelle Obama from Princeton. Both attended Harvard Law School.

"I am a product of a working-class background, I am one of those folks who grew up in that struggle. That is the lens through which I see the world," Michelle Obama said, referring to her family that lived on the South side of Chicago on her father's city salary.

  • 16 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
12
3.5
{"commentId":1700278,"authorDomain":"marygj"}

How's that for transparency?

{"commentId":1700278,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"marygj"}
  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:52 PM EDT
{"commentId":1700286,"authorDomain":"JohnRussell"}

Who cares? I always thought all these people make a lot of money. So what?

{"commentId":1700286,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"JohnRussell"}
  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:55 PM EDT
{"commentId":1700411,"authorDomain":"witchofthenorth"}

Pretty clear, MaryGJ.

{"commentId":1700411,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"witchofthenorth"}
  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:38 PM EDT
{"commentId":1701095,"authorDomain":"marygj"}

Nevermind that most of his income was from his books unlike some folks who gave grand speeches worth millions. Now we know what Hillary Clinton meant when she said "words matter"--we just did not know how many millions of dollars they mattered at the time. Think she'll use that line again?

{"commentId":1701095,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"marygj"}
  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:29 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1700419,"authorDomain":"dtagair"}

The Obamas have nothing to complain about. Since Obama's mother was an anthropologist who was able to go to Kenya and Indonesia to do research, how can he say they were on foodstamps? Both Obamas went to Harvard Law School. It does not seem like they struggled much. Obama's father's family are and were land owners in Kenya making them rich in that country. Just as Rev Wright's past is not what Obama portrayed it as what is the truth about the Obama family?

{"commentId":1700419,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"dtagair"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:40 PM EDT
{"commentId":1700632,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
It does not seem like they struggled much.

If struggling were a requirement for high office, we'd have more vacancies in the Halls of Power than there are in Detroit. Fat chance a regular working stiff could find the time or money to run for more than dog catcher. Washington is a place that has a high tab for admission to all. Obama didn't come from a legacy family. He punched his own ticket and whatever got the boy into Harvard was a damn sight more than Dubbya had to do, to be enrolled.

{"commentId":1700632,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 8 votes
#2.1 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:55 PM EDT
{"commentId":1701299,"authorDomain":"witchofthenorth"}

Well that's okay Sgt Dave, because it doesn't read like the Obama's are complaining just reporting their income. And I don't find any reference to food stamps on except in your comment.

But whatever.

As Pamela has said, politics is not a poor man's game.

The Obama's seem to have made their money the old-fashioned way, by earning it - isn't that supposed to be the American dream?

{"commentId":1701299,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"witchofthenorth"}
  • 4 votes
#2.2 - Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:36 AM EDT
{"commentId":1701441,"authorDomain":"marygj"}

Glinda Obama mentioned foodstamps in his stump speech the other day. No big deal for a single mother to get foodstamps if she needed them. To somehow think that just because
they both went to Harvard makes them rich is ridiculous.

SGT David never does any research he just Obama bashes that is his MO.

{"commentId":1701441,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"marygj"}
  • 3 votes
#2.3 - Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:31 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1700580,"authorDomain":"anthopos"}

The Clinton's made five times what the Obama's made in 2007 and the writer still feels it's appropriate to bring up the charge of elitism? He's by far the "poorest" candidate.

{"commentId":1700580,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"anthopos"}
  • 7 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:37 PM EDT
{"commentId":1700630,"authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}

While I can see the implications, I find it laughable that a candidate's childhood has to involve some type of financial struggle in order for him/her to be capable of running a country. You hear it all of the time, "Oh, she went to an Ivy League school"... "His family had money"... Like these are damnable things. I feel - while the experience of poverty can be enriching - is not a standard that I crave when choosing a presidential candidate.

{"commentId":1700630,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:54 PM EDT
{"commentId":1700648,"authorDomain":"geejay"}

On the whole, I prefer my politicians to be the type to forge their own paths, rather than legacies, like Bush.

{"commentId":1700648,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"geejay"}
  • 4 votes
#4.1 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:02 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1700800,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

Good for him. But I'm thinking that it's time for a "Big-Politicians" tax, which would, like my proposed "Big-Rock Star" tax, liberate any excess profits/income above a specified threshold, say anything over $200,000 per annum. Or better yet, limit a politician's income to no more than 10 times the yearly wage of the average voter. THIS is fairness.

{"commentId":1700800,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:52 PM EDT
{"commentId":1701394,"authorDomain":"thescottspot"}

Wouldn't that borderline on communism though? If a person worked hard and earned their way, why not allow them to rake in the dough. If the rockstar didn't have fans, if Obama's books weren't read by the people, they wouldn't be rich. The people made rich these examples of the rich. Now why not tax the crooked businesses, like Exxon Mobile?

{"commentId":1701394,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"thescottspot"}
  • 3 votes
#5.1 - Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:12 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1702804,"authorDomain":"jdl-28"}

I guess the gas and food pricing will not hurt him at all, but that still doesn't mean he should be elected. I feel we need to fine all new people to run for office who isn't receing there money from corporation and churches.

{"commentId":1702804,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"jdl-28"}
    Reply#6 - Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:05 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1703719,"authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}

    What?

    {"commentId":1703719,"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253","authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
    • 1 vote
    #6.1 - Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:02 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"251262","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"251262","contentId":"1435253"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking