Dean: McCain's economic plan 'more of the same'

Or, "he's a great man - I stand by his political ideals" haha

Shallow, superficial counter arguments. Tax policies that serve the rich are pale failures compared to incomes policies, the enslavement, unpaid labor, of social surplus, whose total wealth now exceeds for a handful of billionaires, more than 80 percent of the people on the world.

Counterposing tax policies to incomes policies are false choices as counterposing democratic class hacks to republican hacks who follow the same class policies, and imperial foreign disasters that produced Amerikan class empire.

You would not need heavy taxation by the class liberals, to make up for the heavy enslavement, impoverishment, of its middle and working classes, one in which both class parties participate in the same corporate fascism, global class enslavement, if social wealth was based on a social mechanism, social agency, and not the class mechanism, and deformed class agency of its middle layers, the shock troops for the oligarchy. These phony arguments between class liberals and class neocons never ever solve fundamental problems of class regimes, oligarchies and their imperial class empires.

We need a unified middle class, that has joined ranks with the working classes to dismantle the class hierarchies, class ideologies, class policies, that nourishes the oligarchy and class dictatorship. Dismantle these class institutions, and their deformed link to plutocracy, throughout the world, and finally Patriarchy, class exploitation, and the class mechanism will have been broken, for the often, yet falsely claimed principle of social wealth, and moral leadership.

They don't serve the rich. A true conservative tax policy doesn't serve anyone.

Eric - I could almost hear the USSR anthem playing behind your comments.

Funny antoniojvr:

I thought it was your Deutschland uber alles, Corporate fascism over all, class imperialism for the world.

The Soviet Union was a Stalinist country, not a "communist" country. I suggest you read my interview with Redruby, then go to my State of the Union article to get a better grip on ideology.

I do agree about the USSR not being communist. Isn't communism the one where there's no government and the people deal it out by themselves?

I always found it ironic that the two most popular forms of anarchy are communism and ultra libertarianism.

However, the point was not about communism. The USSR was a totalitarian country that FORCED everyone to become middle class. Here's why capitalism is better: it wants those who work hard to become rich and those who are lazy to become poor. Communism wants those who work hard to get the same as those who don't work at all. That's the fundamental flaw.

OK Eric. What is an effective plan?

I am assuming that it is socialism, though it's rather hard to tell in the ramblings. Ever notice? The people who love socialism are those who want to share IN the wealth of others, not those who want to share THEIR wealth with others.

C Anderson:

Your ideological dogmas are showing through. Social wealth is an inherent principle in all economies already. It is their deformed social principle, the definition of class principle, that is instiutionalized, where social property, social wealth si not created to bring about middle classes as a unifed whole, without its deformed class hierarchies, class ideolgoies, and class empire that put property rights, over other peoples property rights, where human rights are trampled, where slavery for profit, for commercial capitalism is justiefied, where corporate fascism justifies the enslavement of Jewish, socialist labor, and today enslaves its workers world wide through unpaid labor, cheap labor markets by this global class mechanism that destroys the middle class, enslaves its working class and finally risks the world with Class empire.

You of course are so ingrained with false dogmas about social wealth, social theories, that your class ideologies cannot come up with analytical, or parallel, analogies to show that this "socialism" already exists in all economies, and the only thing missing is the social mechanism to displace the class mechanism in place since Patriarchy, hence the often repeated phrase: SOCIALISM FOR THE RICH Did you get this clue yet???

where corporate fascism justifies the enslavement of Jewish

Actually, that was under a socialist regime. Hitler was no capitalist.

where human rights are trampled, where slavery for profit, for commercial capitalism is justiefied

I don't think too many Americans have to complain about human rights being trampled. There's no slavery in America. What's wrong with commercial capitalism?

Either way, you didn't answer my question.

Gosh, Eric, I am thrilled with your insults. I wouldn't want you to agree with me on anything.

So, tell us, do you copy this drivel out of a textbook?