Food scientists say stop biofuels to fight world hunger

advertisement

WASHINGTON — Some top international food scientists Tuesday recommended halting the use of food-based biofuels, such as ethanol, saying it would cut corn prices by 20 percent during a world food crisis.

But even as the scientists were calling for a moratorium, President Bush urged the opposite. He declared the United States should increase ethanol use because of national energy security and high gas prices.

The conflicting messages Tuesday highlighted the ongoing debate over food and fuel needs.

The three senior scientists with an international research consortium pushing a biofuel moratorium said nations need to rethink programs that divert food such as corn and soybeans into fuel, given the burgeoning worldwide food crisis. The group, CGIAR, is a global network that uses science to fight hunger. It is funded by dozens of countries and private foundations.

If leading nations stopped biofuel use this year, it would lead to a price decline in corn by about 20 percent and wheat by about 10 percent from 2009-10, said Joachim von Braun. He heads the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington, the policy arm of CGIAR. The United States is the biggest biofuel producer.

He and the other scientists said work should be stepped up on the use of non-grain crops, such as switchgrass, for biofuel.

Another scientist, not associated with the group, agreed with their call for a halt on the use of grain for fuel.

"We need to feed the stomach before we need to feed our cars," said Rattan Lal, an Ohio State University soil sciences professor who in the past has been a critic of some of CGIAR's priorities. "We have 1 billion people who are food insecure. We can't afford the luxury of not taking care of them and taking care of gasoline."

In an interview after the CGIAR teleconference, von Braun said the United States and other countries have to make a hard choice between fighting high fuel prices and fighting world hunger.

"If you place a high value of food security for poor people, then the conclusion is clear that we step on the brake awhile," said von Braun. "If you place a high value on national energy security, other considerations come into play."

Energy security is what Bush emphasized in his press conference. When asked about the conflict with world hunger and the rising cost of food at home, he said the high price of gasoline would "spur more investment in ethanol as an alternative to gasoline.

"And the truth of the matter is, it's in our national interest that our farmers grow energy, as opposed to us purchasing energy from parts of the world that are unstable or may not like us," Bush said.

Still, Bush said the international food crisis "is of concern to us" and said the U.S. government earlier this month added another $200 million in food aid.

A World Bank study has estimated that corn prices "rose by over 60 percent from 2005-07, largely because of the U.S. ethanol program" combined with market forces.

Other nations, such as South Africa, have stopped or slowed the push to ethanol. But because the United States is the biggest producer, if it does nothing, other nations' efforts will not amount to much, von Braun said.

Von Braun said many issues are causing the food crisis, especially market forces and speculation, but that biofuel use also ranks high among the causes.

Scientists say the diversion of corn and soybeans for fuel helps force prices higher, and removes farm land from food production. Ethanol supporters say the corn used for fuels is the type only fed to livestock. However, other experts say it leads to higher livestock feed prices, thus higher food prices.

Because of this issue, legislators in Missouri are considering lifting a requirement that fuel in that state contain 10 percent ethanol.

Just how big biofuel's effect is on food prices depends on who is talking. President Bush said it's responsible for about 15 percent of the rise in costs. U.S. Department of Agriculture spokesman Keith Williams put it closer to 20 percent.

A soon to be released International Food Policy Research Institute analysis blames 30 percent of the overall food price rise from 2000-2007 on biofuels. An industry-funded study put the food cost rise from biofuels at 4 percent.

Matt Hartwig, a spokesman for the Renewable Fuels Association, said, "World agriculture can both feed and fuel the globe."

___

On the Net:

International Food Policy Research Institute on food prices:

http://www.ifpri.org/themes/foodprices/foodprices.asp

The World Bank on biofuels' promise and risk: http://tinyurl.com/5668pu

The White House transcript of President Bush's press conference: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/04/20080429-1.html

The Renewable Fuels Association: http://www.ethanolrfa.org/

  • 10 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.6
{"commentId":1759895,"authorDomain":"mthompson968"}

Can we concentrate on one fear mongering situation at a time please?

{"commentId":1759895,"threadId":"258893","contentId":"1460217","authorDomain":"mthompson968"}
    Reply#1 - Fri May 2, 2008 5:41 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1761041,"authorDomain":"Jerry611"}

    This is not "fear mongering.......

    .......it is a simple analysis of facts and statistics.

    The more corn that is diverted to the ethanol plants the less goes to the feed grainerys .... raising the cost feed for beef and dairy livestock ..... which raises the cost of meat and dairy products. Expensive dairy products means expensive milk, cheese, cream, butter and all the things that are made with those products.

    Also, because the farmer gets a better bang for his buck raising corn, they're using farmland normally used to raise wheat , to raise corn ,,,,,which makes wheat more expensive, raising the cost of flour and cerials. Expensive flour makes all the things made with flour .... like bread ..... expensive.

    Do you see where we're going here? ......... this is a problem! We're saving money on gas and spending it on food..

    But that 's not the worst of it. Rising food cost is one thing ..... diminishing food supplies is another.

    Rice used to be one of the cheapest grain foods available ... look at the price of it now .....find some! for that matter. There is a food shortage in the world!

    Between climate change affecting foodsupplys all over the world and the tampering with our food supply to ease the gas shortage, we may be creating a bigger problem than we already have.

    This not fear mongoring .... it is facing a problem.

    {"commentId":1761041,"threadId":"258893","contentId":"1460217","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
      #1.1 - Sat May 3, 2008 4:11 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1762755,"authorDomain":"mthompson968"}

      I don't know about you but I'm scared. I'm also broke. I have herd that Bio-fuels use a lot of land to grow the stuff, which in turn (tilling the fields) causes more CO2 releasing from soil. So jack the food prices, get more fields plow to release CO2, and jack up profits for the oil companies. When will it stop? I haven't seen the gas price go down more then a few cents since this has been taken place. I don't know about where you live, but in NY its about 3.83 a gallon. Seems like they make multiple problems to try to solve one problem that is even debatable to many scientist. The fear mongering part I was talking about was global warming, and then food prices causing even more economic devastation. As of right now I am not sure about the whole green house gas thing is true or not, I know the globe is under a climate change, but unsure if it has to do with CO2, or just the galaxy rotation.

      {"commentId":1762755,"threadId":"258893","contentId":"1460217","authorDomain":"mthompson968"}
        #1.2 - Sat May 3, 2008 8:16 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":10432296,"authorDomain":"brianalampton"}
        brianalamptonDeleted
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"258893","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"258893","contentId":"1460217"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking