Hillary Clinton says she'll stay in the presidential race

advertisement

SHEPHERDSTOWN — Hillary Rodham Clinton says she will remain in the presidential race "until there's a nominee." The former first lady declined to say whether that meant through the roll call of the states at the Democratic National Convention this summer.

Clinton also disclosed that she had loaned her campaign an additional $6.4 million in recent weeks, additional evidence that her once front-runner campaign was in deep trouble.

She told reporters the loans were a sign of her commitment to her quest for the White House. She earlier loaned herself $5 million as she struggled to keep up with a better-financed Obama campaign.

Meanwhile, Barack Obama pocketed the support of at least four Democratic convention superdelegates on Wednesday, building on the momentum from a convincing North Carolina primary victory.

Obama, now the front-runner, was home in Chicago during the day as his aides spread word that he would soon begin campaigning in states likely to be pivotal in the fall campaign. They also relayed word of the four endorsements, expected to be made public later in the day.

Both disclosures were meant to signal fresh confidence that the nomination was quickly coming into his possession after a grueling marathon across 15 months and nearly all 50 states.

Clinton's appearance in Shepherdstown, W.Va., was meant to underscore her determination to stay the course. She also arranged a private meeting later in the day with uncommitted superdelegates.

Clinton won the Indiana primary narrowly early Wednesday, but the overall impact of the night's two contests was to lengthen Obama's lead in national convention delegates without fundamentally altering the nature of the race.

Obama has 1,840.5 delegates to 1,688 for Clinton in The Associated Press tally. It takes 2,025 delegates to win the nomination in Denver this summer.

Clinton told reporters it would take 2,209 or 2,210 delegates to win the nomination, not the 2,025 in use by the Democratic National Committee. The higher total would come into play if the delegations were seated from Michigan and Florida, two states that held primaries outside the time frame that party rules required.

The former first lady campaigned for months to have new votes in both states, although lately has said she merely wants the delegations seated.

Obama's campaign manager, David Plouffe, said on Tuesday night it was possible a compromise could be worked out to seat the Michigan delegates. He did not mention Florida.

Asked at her news conference whether she intended to remain in the race through the convention roll call, Clinton said, "I'm staying in this race until there's a nominee and obviously I am going to work as hard as I can to become that nominee."

While Clinton showed no sign of surrender, former Sen. George McGovern, the party's 1972 presidential candidate, urged her to reconsider.

Obama's campaign on Wednesday weighed ways to bring the drawn-out Democratic nominating process to a close while mapping out a strategy that will involve campaigning in battleground states where primaries have already been held.

Obama's drive to nail down the party nod was buoyed with a double-digit win in North Carolina and a stronger-than-expected run in Indiana, where he almost overcame rival Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Obama was expected to compete for the six remaining Democratic contests but to also turn attention to general election states, aides said.

Likely Republican presidential nominee John McCain has "run free for some time now" because of Democratic preoccupation with the ongoing primary fight, said Obama strategist David Axelrod. "I don't think we're going to spend time solely in primary states," he said. "We have multiple tasks here."

The Illinois senator was enjoying a rare down day in his hometown before returning to Washington, D.C., late Wednesday

He was expected to travel later in the week to Oregon, where he appears to hold the advantage, and then head to the Appalachian coal-states of West Virginia and Kentucky, where Clinton seems to have the edge.

Meanwhile, in an e-mail to supporters soliciting contributions, Obama called his North Carolina showing "a decisive victory."

As for Indiana, "we did much better than all the pundits predicted, despite Republicans changing parties to support Senator Clinton, believing she would be easier for Senator McCain to defeat," Obama wrote. "Now is the time for each one of us to step up and do what we can to close out this primary."

Obama's campaign made broad suggestions that it was time for the 270 remaining unaligned superdelegates — who will determine the outcome of the race — to get off the fence, claiming the delegate math leaves little path for a Clinton victory.

"We think the Clinton camp has gotten away with a little bit of creating these alternative views of reality," said Obama campaign manager David Plouffe.

Clinton's loan more than doubled her personal investment in her bid for the Democratic nomination. She gave her campaign $5 million earlier this year.

A campaign aide said Clinton gave her campaign another $5 million on April 11, more than a week before the Pennsylvania primary. She then again dipped into her personal wealth for $1 million last week and $425,000 on Monday, one day before the North Carolina and Indiana primaries.

Clinton's campaign reported raising $10 million online after her Pennsylvania victory on April 22. Evidently, the money was not enough and her fundraising was unable to keep up with her expenses heading into Tuesday's contests.

Moreover, Obama has routinely outspent her in primary after primary and has shown little difficulty tapping his vast network of donors. He spent more than $7 million on advertising head of Tuesday's primaries in North Carolina and Indiana to her nearly $4 million.

According to the latest campaign finance reports filed with the Federal Election Commission, Obama began the month of April with $42 million in the bank for the primary to Clinton's $9.3 million.

But Clinton had debts of $10.3 million at the start of the month, much of it money owed to her main polling, phone banking and advertising consultants.

And in endorsing Obama, former Sen. George McGovern said Wednesday it's virtually impossible for Clinton to win the nomination. McGovern said he had a call in to former President Clinton to tell him of the decision, adding that he remains close friends with the Clintons.

"I will hold them in affection and admiration all of my days," he said of the Clintons.

McGovern's announcement comes a day before Clinton was scheduled to travel to South Dakota to campaign. The state holds its primary June 3 with 15 pledged delegates at stake.

McGovern said he had no regrets about endorsing Hillary Clinton months ago, even before the Iowa caucuses.

"She has run a valiant campaign. And she will remain an influential voice in the American future," he said.

But Obama has won the nomination "by any practical test" and is very close to a majority of the pledged delegates, said McGovern, who is 85. Obama moved within 200 delegates of clinching the nomination with his split decision on Tuesday of a win in North Carolina and a narrow loss in Indiana.

It's time to unite the Democratic Party, he said.

"Hillary, of course, will make the decision as to if and when she ends her campaign. But I hope that she reaches that decision soon so that we can concentrate on a unified party capable of winning the White House next November," he said.

  • 12 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
9.8
5.1
0.7
{"commentId":1757474,"authorDomain":"nigeriawhatisnew"}

My romantic notion that Hillary may win just because it is her time, after all, she represents more people on this planet than her closest rival. A few good husbands might just swing it.

Even when I'm a mess
I still put on a vest
With an S on my chest
Oh yes
I'm a Superwoman

Superwoman

{"commentId":1757474,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"nigeriawhatisnew"}
    Reply#1 - Fri May 2, 2008 8:15 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1757481,"authorDomain":"marygj"}

    Hillary Clinton stop dividing the party. Stop being a Republican. Stop pandering. You have convinced people you can close the deal but why can't YOU get the 70% of votes YOU need to close YOUR DEAL. Your campaign's punitive ways and dirty republican tactics that were used against you and your husband that you now use against a fellow Democrat is distasteful, disappointing, and despicable. You and Bill have been hardened and are no longer the couple who had the Democrats support throughout your tenure at the WH. I am afraid you will never have that support from at least one demographic in the Democratic base.

    {"commentId":1757481,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"marygj"}
    • 6 votes
    Reply#2 - Fri May 2, 2008 8:16 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1757808,"authorDomain":"cyregray"}

    There is no democratic party, not anymore... and there will be no democratic election either. Whoever gets in office we get there because the establishment chose them. I mean, with all this insanity in Iraq, with a President who has committed War Crimes (Iraq & Afghanistan, Torture) and Treason (illegal Wiretapping & complicity if not direct involvement in 9-11) it should be obvious that if there was a REAL opposition party they would be holding him accountable.

    They aren't, and won't, and our entire world suffers for it.

    {"commentId":1757808,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"cyregray"}
    • 6 votes
    #2.1 - Fri May 2, 2008 9:51 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1757953,"authorDomain":"marygj"}

    I would hope that right after the Democrat is elected in November the impeachment proceding against Bush and Cheney will begin. It is the only way to make them accountable and to prevent Bush from pardoning Cheney or himself if that is possible.

    {"commentId":1757953,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"marygj"}
      #2.2 - Fri May 2, 2008 10:22 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1757994,"authorDomain":"backroadsbubba"}

      You know, Obama is sizing up as quite the divisive figure, himself.

      {"commentId":1757994,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"backroadsbubba"}
      • 3 votes
      #2.3 - Fri May 2, 2008 10:30 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1758301,"authorDomain":"chasing"}
      Hillary Clinton stop dividing the party.

      Well holy hell, the same could be said of Obama, and anyway, she isn't "dividing the party" - the party is dividing itself. Unless you really intend to imply that she has Clinton Fairies flittering about the nation, sprinkling "split the party dust" upon unsuspecting Democrats while they slumber?

      Or could it be that, instead (and I would argue, more plausibily) simply that Democrats themselves are making up their own minds? I'm so sorry they don't all conveniently fall in line behind your candidate. But to insinuate that Clinton is "dividing the party" is, in essence, calling her supporters brain-dead zombies.

      Because, yeah, that's the way to bring about party unity. Right.

      {"commentId":1758301,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"chasing"}
      • 1 vote
      #2.4 - Fri May 2, 2008 11:38 AM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1757706,"authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}

      haven't you americans learnt anything. You elected another Bush in to house and now you want another Clinton who IMO is worse than Bill.

      Hitlery is a wolf in sheeps clothing

      Bush
      Clinton
      Bush
      Clinton?

      ????????WAKE UP???????????

      {"commentId":1757706,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}
      • 6 votes
      Reply#3 - Fri May 2, 2008 9:30 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1757933,"authorDomain":"enginerd"}

      If you think about in terms of elections it gets even sadder..

      bush, clinton, clinton, bush, bush...clinton... It has been twenty years so far and I don't understand how anyone can get past the idea if she were to win and get two terms we will have gone 28 years with our leadership coming from just two families. Should we start getting used to the idea that Jeb's to follow?

      Try saying it over and over again..."bush,clinton, clinton, bush, bush, clinton". I think someone could make a great commercial with just some kids playing double dutch reciting it over and over again. Maybe then people will start to realize how disturbing the idea really is...

      {"commentId":1757933,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"enginerd"}
      • 4 votes
      #3.1 - Fri May 2, 2008 10:18 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1758287,"authorDomain":"onlineapps"}

      Who cares? I don't care about the president's last name. I care about whether the person is going to be a good president or not. THAT'S ALL THAT MATTERS.

      {"commentId":1758287,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"onlineapps"}
      • 4 votes
      #3.2 - Fri May 2, 2008 11:34 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1758304,"authorDomain":"chasing"}
      I don't care about the president's last name.

      Damn those Roosevelts! Damn them to hell!

      {"commentId":1758304,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"chasing"}
      • 1 vote
      #3.3 - Fri May 2, 2008 11:39 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1758460,"authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}
      bush, clinton, clinton, bush, bush...clinton... It has been twenty years so far

      You can also include the years when Bush Snr was VP to Ronald Ray Gun before he came president

      {"commentId":1758460,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}
      • 2 votes
      #3.4 - Fri May 2, 2008 12:08 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1757778,"authorDomain":"cyregray"}

      Have to agree with mars... does anybody think these polls are done without an agenda? It's so obvious that they're prepping the mainstream for what is to come it hurts. We'll tell you who will be (s)elected... don't you worry your pretty little head.

      There is no democracy people, this planet is a whole lot scarier then it seems, and those in power do not govern with our best interests at heart. If half the American populace would wake up and stop dreaming about reality television, suvs and this inane "election" nonsense we MIGHT have a chance. As it stands things look like they're gonna get a whole lot worse before people wise up.

      {"commentId":1757778,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"cyregray"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#4 - Fri May 2, 2008 9:46 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1757815,"authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}

      Maybe that is the kick up the backside we need. Sad but true

      {"commentId":1757815,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"kidsarocker"}
      • 1 vote
      #4.1 - Fri May 2, 2008 9:53 AM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1757958,"authorDomain":"youssef51"}

      Anybody taking bets for Senator Clinton as dem nominee?

      I want 3 to 1, people.

      Triple money, or nothin'.

      Senator Clinton as next president, I want 5 to 1.

      {"commentId":1757958,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"youssef51"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#5 - Fri May 2, 2008 10:23 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1757989,"authorDomain":"kcsdarwin"}

      The Niagara Falls of pissing and moaning is astonishing. This has been the most democratic and participatory nominating process in decades. It's cool. The contest between ideas and candidates is usually wrapped up in a couple of weekends; by Feb 5th at the latest. It's healthy to go on this long. Enjoy it.

      {"commentId":1757989,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"kcsdarwin"}
        Reply#6 - Fri May 2, 2008 10:29 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1758114,"authorDomain":"witchofthenorth"}
        Clinton appeared to be gaining strength among voters, especially the white working-class which has reacted negatively to Obama's association with Rev. Jeremiah Wright — the Illinois senator's former pastor who called from the pulpit for God to damn America for it's treatment of African Americans.

        In other words, keeping this sideshow on the TV is working.

        {"commentId":1758114,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"witchofthenorth"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#7 - Fri May 2, 2008 10:54 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1758269,"authorDomain":"miasma"}

        Guilty by association? Or is that just for black folk? To be honest though, I didn't find anywhere Kantor was listed on the Hillz'08 campaign.

        {"commentId":1758269,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"miasma"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#8 - Fri May 2, 2008 11:31 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1758594,"authorDomain":"zennhead"}

        I'd say there is safety in remaining "undecided." I would guess many would rather not reveal or expose any prejudices they hold. I can see people lying -- committing the "Mayor Tom Bradley" effect ... saying they'll support Obama but not voting that way. There could be some of that, but also, more and more energy coming from women, and some slicing down of the white male support Obama has enjoyed as men open minded enough to look at their own chauvinism, look at how they've rejected Senator Clinton based on such sentiments and beliefs. As such, cutting into that vital dynamic of Obama's could really hurt him. In case folks haven't noticed, he doesn't like to lose. His mood and attitudes change and stay with him ... he is more down looking, and acting. He has taken to bringing Michelle out on the campaign trail WITH him, not running on her own. It is possible that he feels more insecure after the latest Wright flap. He may need her to be present near him more. He seems tired, and one report attributed to David Axlerod said he was bored with the way the campaign had going ... hence, going out and meeting smaller groups. Senator Clinton is a consummate campaigner. I just turned 61. I can't believe she is able to be out there at her pace. Bill is also out there, at his pace. Chelsey is, too. They all have tremendous energy. If all three are actually holding more rallies in places where younger voters can get exposed to them ... and some calve away from Mr. O, then that is already being reported to Obama via his own polling. And vice versa with the Clintons. She is a consummate campaigner, too, at large and small venues. He is far more adept at the large, eloquent and momentous speaking venue. Presidents don't really do that that much. They meet with smaller crowds in smaller venues, and she has learned how to do that. The Clintons have much more political experience than the Obamas. As such, they know more about pacing themselves. Having Michelle with Barack detracts from her ability to be at separate venues, addressing separate crowds.
        As such, they've LOST that advantage, if she is accompanying him more often. ANY slippage among young men or women voters, better educated, and under the age of 30, is a loss to Obama. It is a gain to Clinton. If more white men of blue collar status are going to her, they're choosing one demographic over another -- first woman v. first African-American. In the next election, Hispanic Americans will be a serious challenge to African-Americans. The demographics of our nation ARE changing and ARE going to begin showing up in political races everywhere. I support Clinton because she's far more skilled, experienced, and ready, willing and able to stand firm in the face of daunting attacks. She IS tenacious, and I BELIEVE she IS undergoing a change in her views and sensibilities by WHO looks to her for help, and WHO votes for her. She IS going to people who truly don't have people watching their backs. The Buppie/Yuppie types for Obama have their own coterie of advisors to help with health care information; legal; technical; employment opportunities; skills in navigating a changing and very brisk world around them. There are simply too many people who don't inform themselves of the Internet. They rely on TV or radio. To make snide comments about that group of people IS Ultra Liberal and Elitist. It is another form of discrimination, and certainly amounts to gross snobbery. The demographics are right there in front of you, everytime you see the crowds. I have to remember what Jesus said (and Buddha probably did, too): What you do for the least among you, you do for me." Clinton's health care pan epitomizes that message. Obamas excludes.
        These are very frightening times, due to get worse, not better. People see themselves literally getting sick, falling behind in house payments, and literally, losing their homes, jobs, and having their lives literally break apart. One slip on the banana peel and you're gone, Jack! Obama doesn't really KNOW that as Senator Clinton does. Not really. His background may have been very standard and modest ... he isn't that anymore. When Michelle Obama whines about paying $10,000 for her daughter's piano lessons, well ... that's elitist. Spend a few days in hospitals now, with some surgery and tests. $26,000 two years ago for one day of hospitalization (23 hours); surgery, etc. One day. Maybe those who face that, without insurance, could borrow some from Michelle Obama. Think she'd stop her daughter's piano lessons?

        {"commentId":1758594,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"zennhead"}
          Reply#9 - Fri May 2, 2008 12:35 PM EDT
          {"commentId":1759064,"authorDomain":"mwestenfelder"}

          mistagged

          This ain't "world-news".

          {"commentId":1759064,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"mwestenfelder"}
          • 2 votes
          Reply#10 - Fri May 2, 2008 2:08 PM EDT
          {"commentId":1760963,"authorDomain":"nigeriawhatisnew"}
          Your world, my world

          We are still looking for the butterfly.

          {"commentId":1760963,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"nigeriawhatisnew"}
            #10.1 - Sat May 3, 2008 2:18 AM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":1760569,"authorDomain":"winsomecowboy"}

            polls steer perceptions of reality, the 'polls' are weapons. The 'polls' are reliant on the questions asked. The 'polls' are effectively both meaningless and effective. Just like the population are spoonfed their reality and enjoying the contrived sideshow that is the leadup to the sham of elections. No-one as invested in this sham would be likely to question it's validity. Gosh it's a nailbiter isn't it? Doesn't matter that any rationalist would have buried Hillary weeks ago as a statistical forgone conclusion, an impossibility as a contender, the circus continues, not because 'it's a close race' the race was over long ago, but because 'the polls' are now uniformly sweeting the pot to upgrade credibility when the switch is thrown.

            sorry, back to your earnest bickering about your democracy.

            {"commentId":1760569,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"winsomecowboy"}
            • 3 votes
            Reply#11 - Fri May 2, 2008 9:56 PM EDT
            {"commentId":1775939,"authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}

            heh, maybe Hillary is still in the game as training for her daughter. ;D

            {"commentId":1775939,"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226","authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
            • 2 votes
            Reply#12 - Wed May 7, 2008 1:45 PM EDT
            {"canLink":false,"threadId":"258623","isPrivate":false}
            Leave a Comment:
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
            {"threadId":"258623","contentId":"1465226"}
            Start TrackingStart Tracking
            Stop TrackingStop Tracking