Polls: Less-educated whites hurt Obama

advertisement

A CLINTON ADVANTAGE OVER OBAMA IN NOVEMBER, THOUGH MCCAIN DOES BEST OF ALL

According to an Associated Press-Yahoo News poll in April, the certain Republican presidential nominee John McCain would get more votes than Hillary Rodham Clinton from white voters who have not finished college, 43 percent to 30 percent. Barack Obama would do even worse than Clinton, trailing McCain with this group 44 percent to 22 percent. McCain has a 23-percentage point lead against Clinton among whites who have graduated college, but just an eight-point margin over Obama with that group.

DEMOCRATIC CONTEST TAKES ITS TOLL

Obama was viewed unfavorably in April by 53 percent of whites without college degrees, up from 41 percent in November's AP-Yahoo poll. Clinton's negative ratings with that group have not really changed, but have not gotten better, either. Fifty-seven percent of these voters had unfavorable views of Clinton in November, and 55 percent did in April. McCain's negative views from them sat at 32 percent both months.

HOW RACE AND EDUCATION AFFECT THE RACE

Exit polls of voters in last month's Pennsylvania Democratic primary show the impact of racial attitudes. Forty-seven percent of whites without college degrees who said race was an important factor in choosing a candidate said they would vote for Obama in an Obama-McCain matchup, with 29 percent saying they would back McCain and 20 percent saying they would not vote. Obama gets the votes of 62 percent of whites who have not finished college who said race was not a factor.

Among white college graduates, 69 percent who said race is a factor said they would vote for Obama. Eighty-one percent who said race is not important would back him.

IT'S ALSO ABOUT AGE ...

According to the AP-Yahoo poll, 22 percent of whites who have not finished college are under age 30, compared to 29 percent that young with college degrees. Also, 19 percent of the less-educated whites are age 65 or more, compared to 10 percent of those with degrees who are that old. Both mean advantages for Clinton, who attracts older voters.

... AND INCOME

Sixty-one percent of whites without college degrees are from households earning less than $50,000 a year, compared to 47 percent who have finished college. And only 6 percent of whites with less than a college education earn more than $100,000 annually, compared to 17 percent with degrees. Obama tends to attract the most affluent voters, Clinton the poorest.

YES, IT'S A PROBLEM

Other surveys also illustrate Obama's problem with less-educated white voters. A poll released last week by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center showed that Clinton's lead over Obama among whites who have not completed college, which was 10 percentage points in March, has grown to 40 points. And another by Quinnipiac University showed that while Clinton tied Republican candidate John McCain among these voters in Florida and had slight leads in Ohio and Pennsylvania, McCain had sizable leads over Obama with them in Florida and Ohio and a smaller one in Pennsylvania.

  • 4 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.2
0.4
{"commentId":1761488,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

This ignores the fact that the undereducated and uneducated are less prone to being swayed by theoretical excuses conjured up by smooth-talking elites, than fellow "elites" are.

One thing about the 'dumb', when they smell smoke they get out. They don't sit around trying to figure out if the accompanying fire is a serious immediate threat. I admit though that real stupidity lives among all classes, something many of the educated are to imbecilic and puffed up to realize.

{"commentId":1761488,"threadId":"259104","contentId":"1467109","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sat May 3, 2008 11:01 AM EDT
{"commentId":1767121,"authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
This ignores the fact that the undereducated and uneducated are less prone to being swayed by theoretical excuses conjured up by smooth-talking elites, than fellow "elites" are.

This is amusing to me as under educated and uneducated are more prone to being manipulated by old political tricks. According to Clinton, economists are all elitists and she refuses to listen to them. So really, lets see... Listen to Clinton regarding our economy or listen to majority of economists all siding against Hilary on the issue of gas tax. Wow! Tough call but I think I'm going to go with the economists!

{"commentId":1767121,"threadId":"259104","contentId":"1467109","authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Mon May 5, 2008 10:06 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1761570,"authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}

Is it bad that I laugh whenever folks stress that "undereducated" Americans are Hillary Clinton's strongest base? heh =[

{"commentId":1761570,"threadId":"259104","contentId":"1467109","authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Sat May 3, 2008 11:45 AM EDT
{"commentId":1762035,"authorDomain":"CurtisLow"}
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Good as Fox news. Right-wing media at it's best.

{"commentId":1762035,"threadId":"259104","contentId":"1467109","authorDomain":"CurtisLow"}
    Reply#3 - Sat May 3, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1765664,"authorDomain":"dyanomics"}

    Quit parsing the vote. Hillary is already defeated and Obama will beat McCain.

    {"commentId":1765664,"threadId":"259104","contentId":"1467109","authorDomain":"dyanomics"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Sun May 4, 2008 8:28 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1767571,"authorDomain":"jdl-28"}

    If I wanted someone vote I would not say they was less educated, some people might not have a education but have common sense who would you prefer to depend on. Many of the first people to start business and made it big never went to high school, would you say with less of a education they would not be able to decide who to vote for.

    Why would undereducated decide to vote for Clinton over Obama, I would think it would be the other way around, many black people never finish high school or got a GED.

    {"commentId":1767571,"threadId":"259104","contentId":"1467109","authorDomain":"jdl-28"}
      Reply#5 - Mon May 5, 2008 12:08 PM EDT
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"259104","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"259104","contentId":"1467109"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking