Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Buffett, Munger say many financial companies deserve pain

Mon May 5, 2008 7:06 AM EDT
business, media, berkshire, charlie-munger, billionaires-warren-buffett
Josh Funk, AP Business Writer
Advertise | AdChoices

OMAHA — Billionaires Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger say the pain many financial institutions are feeling because of the credit crunch is well deserved.

The chairman and vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. said Sunday that the financial companies that engineered subprime mortgages and the investment funds backed by those mortgages don't deserve much sympathy as they record losses now.

Buffett said the current financial crisis is a byproduct of a system that encouraged executives to "paint pretty pictures."

Munger said lots of financial institutions acted with stupidity and overreached to improve earnings in recent years.

"I think you have to start with the idea that a lot of the current troubles are richly deserved," Munger said.

The complexity of the tactics that financial institutions often employ makes it difficult to determine what those companies are worth — even for Buffett.

"There are some financial institutions I can't value," Buffett said.

He said if someone had $1 million to invest in 10 stocks, it would be easier to find good values in the Korean stock market than among U.S. banks because the banks are so complicated.

Buffett said he recently read a 270-page annual report that an investment bank filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and he had unanswered questions about 25 pages of the report.

"They're cleaning up their act now to some degree because they had to," Buffett said.

Munger said he doesn't think investment banks spend enough time thinking about risk and ways to avoid it like he and Buffett do at Berkshire.

"We try to behave as if Berkshire stock was all owned by crippled relatives," Munger said.

Buffett said the pain isn't over yet for financial institutions, but he said nobody can predict how many more times banks will have to write down the value of their assets.

The largest U.S. bank, Citigroup Inc., alone has taken more than $45 billion of write-downs and credit losses since June 30.

Buffett and Munger spent nearly three hours answering reporters' questions Sunday at their only planned news conference of the year. It is one of the events surrounding Berkshire's annual shareholders meeting that attracted 31,000 people to Omaha on Saturday.

Buffett reiterated that he believes the U.S. economy is in a recession by his definition, even if it hasn't yet met the commonly used criteria of two quarters of negative growth.

He said his definition of a recession is when most people and businesses are not doing as well as they were three, six or nine months ago.

"I would say that we're in a recession clearly," Buffett said.

He said the Federal Reserve's bailout of Bear Stearns Cos. likely prevented a crisis among investment banks because Bear Stearns held a large number of derivative contracts with other investment banks. If Bear Stearns went bankrupt, all those derivatives would have to be valued at zero or unloaded quickly.

But he and Munger agreed that not every business or investment bank should be rescued, because failure is an important part of capitalism.

"Capitalism without failure is like Christianity without hell," Buffett said.

Lenders and investors who were dumb enough to deal in subprime mortgages should not receive any special help, Buffett said, but if homeowners were deceived about the terms of an adjustable mortgages, they should be helped.

"People make mistakes in capitalism," Buffett said. "They shouldn't be penalized for being misled, but they shouldn't be protected from mistakes."

Buffett said the mortgage mess grew partly out of the belief many people had that their homes would always increase in value. And he said many of the mortgages that are in trouble are ones with which owners refinanced and took out more cash than they'd ever paid for the home.

Those homeowners and lenders were all counting on tomorrow's home prices to bail them out of today's decision.

"People tend to forget how well the system worked when we had rules that prevented this complexity and aggression," Munger said.

Berkshire owns more than 60 companies including insurance, clothing, furniture, jewelry and candy companies, restaurants, natural gas and corporate jet firms and has major investments in such companies as Coca-Cola Co., Anheuser-Busch Cos. and Wells Fargo & Co.

___

On the Net:

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.: http://www.berkshirehathaway.com

© 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Josh Funk's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Omaha
  • Public Discussion (3)
jdl-28

I agree they should be allow to go out of business, they made their bed live with it. They show people who knew they could afford loan a way to do it for there own profit. In the long run the people who was taking the loans new on their income it would not work, but did it anyway hoping to make money in a year or two.

They decide to take a chance so why should we bail them out it is no difference than buying stock you can lose money on stock, but no one will bail you out for making a bad decision on buying stock.

Everyone want us to help them for making bad decision, thinking we should feel sorry for them. Wake up you should take the loss we did not tell you to sign loan paper when you new your wages would not support the payment.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Mon May 5, 2008 12:31 PM EDT
Al Jacobs-247257

I agree that those firms that exhibited gross malfeasance through their involvement in this subprime-mortgage-house-of-cards do not deserve any special condemnation because of their egregious performance. It's the rare public corporation that does not function under the same guidelines and, given similar circumstances, you may expect most companies to perform comparably. Corporate America is a hazardous place. Consider one such firm: Merrill Lynch. In 2006, its CEO, E. Stanley O'Neal, joined the parade to invest heavily in the area. Mortgage loans on properties with no securing equity, to borrowers with poor credit, served as collateral for bonds that Merrill packaged and resold to their investors. Everything evolved splendidly until the chickens came home to roost.
How could such a fiasco occur? It's not because Stan O'Neal is financially unsophisticated. His depth of experience, together with an 11-member seasoned board of directors, nine of whom he handpicked, indicates something more than naïve blunder. The momentous errors in judgment must be otherwise explained.
In 2002, Mr. O'Neal received a $500,000 salary. However, his bonus and stock options tied to corporate performance totaled $13.8 million. By 2004 his income rose to $28.14 million. The inducement is pursuit of activities that enhance quarterly profits despite the likelihood of unfavorable long-term results. As evidence of this, we'll fast-forward to October 30, 2007. Despite the corporation's abominable performance, resulting in Mr. O'Neal's ouster, he nonetheless received $161.5 million as an exit package. The key, of course, is enactment of self-serving employment contracts that are of the executives . . . by the executives . . . and for the executives.
If you believe Merrill's misfortune is unique, take a look at Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, IndyMac Bancorp, Wachovia, Bank of America, and others. They all functioned similarly with identical results: billions lost.
What is the moral? We should not expect corporate officials to faithfully represent shareholders' interests. The real criticism should be directed at an investing public that tolerates these activities by continuing to purchase and hold corporate securities while refusing to demand accountability from its boards of directors.

Posted by Al Jacobs, author of Nobody's Fool, A Skeptic's Guide to Prosperity
www.onthemoneytrail.com

    #1.1 - Tue May 6, 2008 11:56 AM EDT
    Reply
    MinnieApolis

    I wonder if our Mel C will weigh in -- Buffett said that he reads some bank annual reports and is left with unanswered questions.

    The complexity of the tactics that financial institutions often employ makes it difficult to determine what those companies are worth — even for Buffett.
    "There are some financial institutions I can't value," Buffett said.
    He said if someone had $1 million to invest in 10 stocks, it would be easier to find good values in the Korean stock market than among U.S. banks because the banks are so complicated.
    Buffett said he recently read a 270-page annual report that an investment bank filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and he had unanswered questions about 25 pages of the report.
    "They're cleaning up their act now to some degree because they had to," Buffett said.

    I mean, this is a guy who can read annual reports like we read the comic pages. If he can't figure out what they are saying, or hiding, how do the rest of us cope?
    We are left with tossing darts at a list of stocks.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Mon May 5, 2008 8:28 PM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com