Emily, Jacob again top list of most popular baby names

advertisement

WASHINGTON — Emily again topped the list of most popular baby girl names last year, registering as No. 1 for the 12th straight time. Jacob led among names for boys for the ninth year in a row.

New parents didn't stray far from past habits in 2007 when naming their babies. Only one name — Elizabeth — is new to the top-10 list, returning after a two-year absence. Samantha, which previously ranked 10th, dropped to No. 12, according to the latest list released Saturday by the Social Security Administration.

Biblical names continued to dominate the boys' list. Besides Jacob, other top picks for boys were Michael, Joshua and Matthew.

For girls, Isabella, Emma and Ava came after Emily, which has been the most popular female name since 1996.

Rounding out the top 10 for girls, in order, were Madison, Sophia, Olivia, Abigail, Hannah and Elizabeth.

The list for boys also includes Ethan, Daniel, Christopher, Anthony, William and Andrew.

Name experts have said the staying power of the top names may have something to do with appealing to multiple ethnic or religious groups and having no widespread negative connotations. Emily also has literary associations, including Emily Dickinson, evoking images of a woman who is both beautiful and smart, professors say.

For male twins, parents were most likely to combine Jacob with Joshua, Matthew with Michael and Daniel with David. The most popular combination for female twins was Ella and Emma.

Also popular in 2007 were names for girls that were based on spiritual and philosophical concepts. Rising to No. 31 was Nevaeh, or "heaven" spelled backwards; it previously ranked 43rd. Also represented in 2007 were Destiny (No. 41); Trinity (No. 72); Serenity (No. 126); Harmony (No. 315) and Miracle (No. 461). Cutting against the trend was Armani (No. 971).

Parents were less likely to name their sons based on spiritual concepts, although the 2007 list includes Sincere (No. 622) and Messiah (No. 723).

Social Security began compiling the name lists in 1997. The agency offers lists of baby names for each year since 1880 on the agency's Web site at http://www.socialsecurity.gov.

  • 2 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.2
{"commentId":1788207,"authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}

Um.
Is the baby's name in that picture Jacob or Emily? Because otherwise, I'm at a loss as to why there is a picture of Obama posted for this article. lol

{"commentId":1788207,"threadId":"262763","contentId":"1480279","authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sun May 11, 2008 9:27 AM EDT
{"commentId":1788474,"authorDomain":"TBK"}

I think the baby in the picture is trying to figure out what's going on as well. As a matter fact it appears she's trying to get the hell-outta there.

{"commentId":1788474,"threadId":"262763","contentId":"1480279","authorDomain":"TBK"}
    Reply#2 - Sun May 11, 2008 12:05 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1788706,"authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}

    haha
    Right?!

    I don't understand why candidates still mess with that publicity stunt. So old and lame.

    {"commentId":1788706,"threadId":"262763","contentId":"1480279","authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Sun May 11, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"262763","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"262763","contentId":"1480279"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking