Manson ranch dig called off with no bodies found

advertisement

RIDGECREST — Investigators and scientists went to Charles Manson's last hideout to hunt for clandestine graves that could contain other possible victims. The closest thing they found were animal bones.

The dig for human remains ended Wednesday after four sites yielded no bodies, leaving scientists puzzled over the clues that enticed them to go this far.

The excavation had been scheduled to last three days, ending Thursday. But the work went faster than scheduled, with the crew of 20 digging until dusk, then camping out at night beside the ranch house Manson and his followers had used.

"There have been no human remains found," Inyo County Sheriff Bill Lutze said. "We're finishing up this site and that'll be it for the day — nothing."

Manson and his followers hid out at Barker Ranch after their 1969 killing spree in Los Angeles. For years, rumors have swirled about other possible Manson victims, including hitchhikers and runaways who visited the site and were never heard from again.

The clan was ultimately prosecuted for nine murders; Manson is serving a life prison sentence.

Lutze said investigators were glad they didn't find evidence of any additional victims.

"If we came up with nothing, that's great because (it means) there's nobody out here buried," he said.

Scientists who conducted a preliminary probe of the rugged, remote site in February said they identified several spots that could be graves, leading the sheriff to conduct the exploratory excavation.

By Wednesday afternoon, the four sites deemed most likely to hold human remains had been dug up and the dirt sifted. With the work done, the teams packed up and went home for good.

The search revealed little more than a .38-caliber shell casing — found on the surface on the first day and promptly dismissed by law enforcement personnel as being recent — and a pack rat's underground nest.

One site revealed fragments of animal bones, an ash pit and some stones used to make arrowheads. Rangers determined it was of archaeological interest, so digging stopped and the site was turned over to the National Park Service.

The rugged terrain, accessible only by four-wheel-drive vehicles, and triple-digit temperatures, made the work hard for those involved. The nature of the soil — dry and chocked with rocks — made it difficult to operate some of the new forensic tools being put to work on the project, some for the first time on a case outside the laboratory, researchers said.

"The story here is not what was found or what was not found but how we looked," forensic consultant Charles Illsley said. "I can tell you based on my experience that this has been one of the most exhaustive applications for a number of combined technologies."

The researchers said the physical environment made it harder to determine what was underground. Plants that exude unusual chemicals and rocks with magnetic properties were throwing off their equipment, they said.

"I haven't been this frustrated in a very long time," said Arpad Vass, a senior researcher at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Vass said the excavation was a learning process.

"We're trying to improve the science. It's in its infancy," he said. "There could be additional people out there. But unless there are leaps in this kind of science, we'll never know."

In Ballarat, an abandoned mining town near the mouth of the canyon that leads to the ranch, Rock Novak, the town's only resident, held out the last of a series of Manson T-shirts he had made.

Few people come through the area: off-road enthusiasts, the occasional movie crew looking for a dramatic landscape, Manson fanatics. Even after the out-of-town crew leaves, Novak expects a trickle of visitors to the cult's abandoned home.

"Everybody loves a mystery," he said.

  • 14 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
7.8
2.1
{"commentId":1821589,"authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}

I eat this @!$%# up. I guess it's macabre, but I can't wait to see if they find anything.

{"commentId":1821589,"threadId":"267093","contentId":"1500574","authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Tue May 20, 2008 10:46 AM EDT
{"commentId":1836740,"authorDomain":"jdoyle"}

Hey of you are into digging up dead bodies, I have a skunk buried in my back yard about 3 1/2 feet down.

{"commentId":1836740,"threadId":"267093","contentId":"1500574","authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Sat May 24, 2008 9:55 AM EDT
{"commentId":1836759,"authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}

Ew. Who would bury a skunk, and why? You're supposed to just fling it into the back 40 and let that be that.

{"commentId":1836759,"threadId":"267093","contentId":"1500574","authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}
  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Sat May 24, 2008 10:05 AM EDT
{"commentId":1837202,"authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
Ew. Who would bury a skunk, and why? You're supposed to just fling it into the back 40 and let that be that.

I would have to fling it about 3 miles to get rid of the smell.
This way I had it in 3 -3 mil thick plastic bags rolled and wrapped about 5 times, and buried it.
My original thought was to put it in the garbage but the pick up was 5 days off.
What I should have dione is put it in the yard of the @!$%# who killed it with his pellet gun but I didn't find about that until after the fact.

{"commentId":1837202,"threadId":"267093","contentId":"1500574","authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Sat May 24, 2008 1:39 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1821702,"authorDomain":"vondicus"}

That's a beautiful photo. It's so strange to see something from so long ago flung starkly into the present day.

{"commentId":1821702,"threadId":"267093","contentId":"1500574","authorDomain":"vondicus"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Tue May 20, 2008 11:16 AM EDT
{"commentId":1822252,"authorDomain":"starlighter2002"}

Wow, this brings back a little faith with law enforcement about the part of the "long arm of the law" Since murder has no statue of limitations, this should be interesting. What if they do find more? What would be the implications for Manson and his "family"?

{"commentId":1822252,"threadId":"267093","contentId":"1500574","authorDomain":"starlighter2002"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Tue May 20, 2008 1:33 PM EDT
{"commentId":2441781,"authorDomain":"weppsjeremiah"}

where was that truck, was it near the owner's place or in the bush?

{"commentId":2441781,"threadId":"267093","contentId":"1500574","authorDomain":"weppsjeremiah"}
    Reply#4 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:03 AM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"267093","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"267093","contentId":"1500574"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking