Energy chief: Flat production behind oil prices

advertisement

AOMORI — Nations should fight rising oil prices by cutting subsidies and vastly increasing investment in energy, while oil-producing countries need to ramp up output and divulge more information about how much they produce, the U.S. energy secretary said Saturday.

Samuel Bodman, attending two days of meetings in northern Japan among energy chiefs from Group of Eight industrialized countries and other top economies, said the surge in world oil prices was largely a simple problem of supply and demand.

Production has stalled since 2005 at 85 million barrels a day, while economic growth — particularly in China and India — has pushed demand ever higher, Bodman said before a meeting of ministers from the U.S., Japan, South Korea, India and China.

"We're in a difficult position where we have a lid on production and we have increasing demand in the world," he told a small group of reporters, dismissing the effects of speculation and unclear inventory levels and other factors on oil prices.

"I would devoutly hope we ... see a reduction of the use of oil in the world on the one hand, and an increase in the supply so we can see some mitigation in the pressure on price," Bodman said.

Oil prices made their biggest single-day surge on Friday, soaring $11 to $138.54 on the New York Mercantile Exchange, an 8 percent increase. That followed a $5.50 increase the day before, taking oil futures more than 13 percent higher in just two days.

While demand has increased as supply has stalled, analysts have also cited the decline of the U.S. dollar, fears about the long-term supply of oil, and aggressive speculation as factors in rising prices.

Bodman said he would likely urge China and other countries at the Japan meeting to slash fuel subsidies, which make gasoline cheaper for consumers — thereby giving them no reason to reduce consumption and allow prices to level off or drop. The International Energy Agency has estimated that oil subsidies in China, India and the Middle East in 2007 totaled some $55 billion.

At the same time, he urged nations to pay heed to an IEA report that the world needs $22 trillion investment in energy supply infrastructure by 2030 to meet rising demand, while developing alternative energy sources.

"We have a situation where we have these high prices and the only solution is to diversify your resources, diversify your sources of fuel," he said, listing nuclear energy, natural gas and renewable sources such as wind and hydropower.

Lack of transparency in the oil market has also been cited as a possible cause of higher prices. Bodman said that while the United States and host Japan have been "diligent" in disclosing production and consumption data, some other countries need to do more.

Proponents of such transparency, including the IEA, say greater disclosure of accurate statistics helps markets set prices that more precisely reflect supply and demand. Underreporting of production, for instance, can drive prices higher as traders think supply is lower than it actually is.

Rising prices were having a negative effect on world economies. The U.S. government, for instance, reported on Friday the nation's unemployment rate rose to 5.5 percent in May, a monthly rise of half a percentage point, the biggest in 22 years.

Bodman said economic troubles because of high prices would only hurt oil producers.

"It's not good for producing nations to see the U.S. struggling economically. They depend on us to be a significant engine in world economic activity," Bodman said.

  • 2 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
4.4
1.0
{"commentId":1914650,"authorDomain":"jerrywcl"}

this is all political garbage one reason the upcoming presidential election #2 media giving publicity to the greedy politicians and oil analyst don't report all this garbage and it would help some i'm sure #3 everbody pick 1 oil company like Exxon/Mobil i mean everbody and don't buy gas from them,see how long they stay in business. this world can't go on like it's going, whats going to happen? shouldn't take much to figure out,won't be anybody left but greedy @!$%#s now where's the little people ???????????

{"commentId":1914650,"threadId":"282094","contentId":"1550460","authorDomain":"jerrywcl"}
    Reply#1 - Sat Jun 7, 2008 8:58 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1918858,"authorDomain":"wingod"}

    Uh, did you actually read the article? Oil production peaked in 2005 and yet demand keeps rising. Fundamental issue.

    Oh by the way, Exxon/Mobil would love to drill for more oil but the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, the West Coast offshore, and ANWR are off limits so that is about 2.5 million barrels a day that we could be producing that we are not because of your friendly neighborhood democrats in congress.

    {"commentId":1918858,"threadId":"282094","contentId":"1550460","authorDomain":"wingod"}
    • 2 votes
    #1.1 - Sat Jun 7, 2008 11:17 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":1914845,"authorDomain":"jerrywdoyle"}

    The president of the United States has gone on record in his "State of the Union" address that the United States is "addicted" to oil. One does not break the habit of an addiction by "feeding" the addiction. The solution is not to drill for more oil in "new" places, such as the ANWAR province, but to move rapidly to develop new alternative sources of energies, something that the USA should have done during the 1970s oil crisis, but failed to do. Breaking from any addiction is painful, emotionally difficult and often expensive. Feeding the addiction just prolongs the problem leading eventually to greater catastrophe.

    Jerry D

    {"commentId":1914845,"threadId":"282094","contentId":"1550460","authorDomain":"jerrywdoyle"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Sat Jun 7, 2008 10:05 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1915576,"authorDomain":"stewag48"}

    jerry d. makes a good point about moving in a rapid and serious effort to develope alternative fuel sources. nescessity is the mother of invention. however the problem we have now is immediate. our
    infrastructure is based on oil (refining etc) and it will take some period of time to shift to other sources.
    as we make that shift we need to take the pressure off of the economy that the high oil prices are causing, one of the ways is to drill in areas that we have control of in the united states. this may be
    disagreeable but nescessary otherwise we will see the ugly head of inflation rise and that is devastating
    to people in lower incomes and fixed incomes. also by doing so it will ease the pressure on prices because the middle east oil won't be the only game in town. the simple truth is that it will take time to
    shift to alternative fuels as a permanent replacement for oil. during that transitional period we should make the most out of the resources we have because we can't just ignore the needs of low income people that are already suffering from the impact of high oil prices that affect every aspect of the economy..........

    {"commentId":1915576,"threadId":"282094","contentId":"1550460","authorDomain":"stewag48"}
      Reply#3 - Sat Jun 7, 2008 12:56 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1917773,"authorDomain":"fechancellor"}
      "We're in a difficult position where we have a lid on production and we have increasing demand in the world," he told a small group of reporters, dismissing the effects of speculation and unclear inventory levels and other factors on oil prices.

      Meaning: The oil production infrastructure in countries such as Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, Mexico, Libya and Nigeria have been neglected for years through either domestic political instability (Nigeria), by US or UN sanctions regimes (Iran, Iraq and Libya) or by decrepit and corrupt political systems (Mexico and Venezuela) leading to declining production, and all need new foreign investment and technology to return to former peak production levels.

      {"commentId":1917773,"threadId":"282094","contentId":"1550460","authorDomain":"fechancellor"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#4 - Sat Jun 7, 2008 7:09 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1918869,"authorDomain":"wingod"}
      and all need new foreign investment and technology to return to former peak production levels.

      Yep but that is not going to happen because as soon as they make the investment the "state" governments take the investment away from them. Look at what happened in Venezuela and is happening to BP now in Russia. You can only get screwed so many times before you just say the heck with them.

      {"commentId":1918869,"threadId":"282094","contentId":"1550460","authorDomain":"wingod"}
      • 2 votes
      #4.1 - Sat Jun 7, 2008 11:19 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"282094","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"282094","contentId":"1550460"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking