Study: Americans use Net to look beyond sound bite

advertisement

NEW YORK — Americans dissatisfied with political sound bites are turning to the Internet for a more complete picture, a new study finds.

In a report Sunday, the Pew Internet and American Life Project said that nearly 30 percent of adults have used the Internet to read or watch unfiltered campaign material — footage of debates, position papers, announcements and transcripts of speeches.

"They want to see the full-blown campaign event. They want to read the speech from beginning to end," said Lee Rainie, director of the Pew group. "It's a push back from the sound-bite culture."

Google Inc.'s YouTube and other video sites have become more popular. Thirty-five percent of adults have watched a political video online during the primary season, compared with 13 percent during the entire 2004 presidential race.

The study also found that 10 percent of adults have used online hangouts like Facebook and News Corp.'s MySpace for political activity, whether it's to add a campaign as a friend on their personal profile pages, discover a friend's political interests or join an online political group.

Of course, video and social networking have grown in general since the last presidential election.

"It is mirroring the broader trends that we see online," Rainie said.

Pew also found online fundraising is up — 6 percent of adults have contributed to a campaign using the Internet, compared with 2 percent in 2004.

The Internet has allowed campaigns to reach first-time donors without the expense of direct mail or phone calls. Democrat Barack Obama has been particularly adept at generating small donations from a vast number of Internet users to become the fundraising leader among all the presidential candidates.

Pew found that among Internet users, Obama supporters were about twice as likely as backers of Democratic rival Hillary Rodham Clinton and Republican John McCain to have made a campaign contribution online.

All told, 46 percent of Americans have used the Internet or cell phone text messaging for some political activity.

Yet they have mixed views about the Internet in politics. Sixty percent of Internet users fear that misinformation and propaganda are widespread online and that too many other voters are trusting that information. And only 28 percent believe the Internet helps them feel more personally connected to the candidate they support.

The telephone study of 2,251 adults, including 1,553 Internet users, was conducted April 8 to May 11 and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.

  • 8 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.4
0.5
{"commentId":1973886,"authorDomain":"Defektiv"}

and this is one of the many reasons the feds, and their corporate sponsors, are working hard to put a controlling strangle-hold on everything internet.

{"commentId":1973886,"threadId":"289956","contentId":"1578345","authorDomain":"Defektiv"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:20 PM EDT
{"commentId":1973962,"authorDomain":"jade-log"}

Well I for one hope the strangle-hold can be broken. What needs to be done is to discover a way to backtrack to the perpetraters of misinformation and hold them accountable.

{"commentId":1973962,"threadId":"289956","contentId":"1578345","authorDomain":"jade-log"}
    #1.1 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:39 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":1974325,"authorDomain":"ntaylor48"}

    I think the strangle hold will be a form of a "Internet Tax!"

    {"commentId":1974325,"threadId":"289956","contentId":"1578345","authorDomain":"ntaylor48"}
      Reply#2 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:07 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1978838,"authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}

      The real guilty parties behind interference with the Internet are the traditional media, whose business model is tanking while they watch, helpless to even understand it.

      . . . to add a campaign as a friend on their personal profile pages . . .

      This statement is, I suspect, unintelligible to most TV managers and newspaper editors. So, of course they have problems with the Internet. It also interferes with anybody's ability to "shape public opinion."

      {"commentId":1978838,"threadId":"289956","contentId":"1578345","authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#3 - Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:37 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1978968,"authorDomain":"rtpricetag"}

      It is not so much the sound-bite's (propaganda) that Corp US-Media put out that is driving citizens to alternative source's, more importantly it is what Corp-Media (are not telling) American-citizens.

      Consider, in election year-2006 angry voters crossed political-lines to elect a DEM-Congress majority with a single 'mandate', return America to a Constitutional-Gov of Law and Order, along with ending a "War Against Humanity" by stopping all criminal actions of the Bush-Admin.

      Immediately after, the DEM "Hierarchy" instead of fulfilling the will of the People, used the sell-out Nancy Pelosi to "Off The Table" every issue mandated by these US-citizens.

      From that time on the five (5) Media-monoploly have censored-out every word about Congressional-Candidates that would dislodge DEM and GOP Hierarchy now destroying America, reporting (instead) about three (3) Presidential Candidates that have apparently already sold out American citizens to Special-Interest's and Foriegn governments.

      {"commentId":1978968,"threadId":"289956","contentId":"1578345","authorDomain":"rtpricetag"}
        Reply#4 - Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:54 PM EDT
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"289956","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"289956","contentId":"1578345"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking