Murder charge for brother whose sister shed scarf

The inability of the west to except a multicultural society is nothing but racism and xenophobia or is it A (genocidal agenda)

Put these "medievalists" away for a good, long time.

Bustin' rocks for a good, long time would do.

If someone wants to move to the west and still wants to hold on to there beliefs that's fine, but in the case of Islam these people who follow this faith refuse to adapt to there new culture and try to impose their beliefs and customs on their new home which is wrong.
No one put a gun to these peoples heads to move here, and if they can't respect their new culture then please go back where you came from.
This girl was killed because of ignorance and the desire of this faith to continue to treat woman as objects instead of human beings.
I'm a firm believer that Islam is just a cult that has abused woman far to long. These men who murdered this girl should burn in hell for this action, there is no justification for this behavior.
As for all you people that say the west is intolerant of Islamic behavior you are totally correct, Islamic behavior is barbaric and a disgrace in the eyes of GOD and civilized man.

This is typical of the fervence of believers in different sects of Islam. I know a Sunni girl who never wears a facial scarf. This happened when one is so indoctrinated into his religion and culture, that there is no forgiveness, no understanding, no give and take. She did not deserve to die for wanting to be like her peers.

Prior to Islam, the Arab world had powerful women, some leaders of tribes. There are references to such in the stories of Mohammed's life, the defeat of the Q'raish for instance. The Arabian Nights traditional tales (see the Payne version) provides an insight into the world of Arabia in tha time also.

The burqa originated in Persia in the 6th century BC, although it was not in the form of the current muslim culture. The burqa did not come into Europe then because the greeks defeated the persians in some rather famous battles. So the persian empire carried the culture east when it conquered Afghanistan and carried out raids and had contact with bedu. But at the time of mohammed, Arab women commonly would have dress or lack of it that was quite sexually provocative. This led to the few comments in Koran about covering breasts and not deliberately stepping heavily, thereby causing body parts to jiggle. :-)

But there is little indication that mohammed was particulary prudish himself. Aside from three references in koran, which establish a code of conduct compatible with today's western dress, there is nothing. There is discussion of women who do things like chase down a slave and tear his shirt because they wanted to have sex with him. But the way this is discussed in koran, as a footnote to establish guilt or not of the slave, indicates that it was not particularly remarkable in its time.

What gets me is how these monsters are so easily able to find other sick people. Murder is often a one person job, and when it's not, it's usually not premeditated. I can't speak for anyone else, but I suspect I'd have significant difficulty finding another person to commit murder with. How is it that this son felt what his father was planning was acceptable, even honorable?

I am curious, was this a Shiia, a Sunni, an Alawite, a Taliban, a Twelver, an Ismalli, a Wahhabi, etc. All these have their elements that would sacrifice their own children for 'Allah.'

I remember, in my testament teachings, that G-d is explicitly clear on sacrificing your children to Moloch.
"You shall not give any of your children to devote them by fire to Moloch, and so profane the name of your God" (Lev. 18:21).