Calif's hands-free cell law for drivers in effect

advertisement

LOS ANGELES — Millions of California motorists have had to put down their cell phones or risk a ticket as a new law takes effect requiring hands-free devices for those behind the wheel.

Police in San Diego and in Oceanside were giving motorists a one-month grace period before beginning to issue citations, but the California Highway Patrol and other agencies were ready to write tickets Tuesday.

"No grace period. The law was passed a year-and-a-half ago," said CHP Officer Heather Hoglund, a spokeswoman in suburban Glendale. "There should be no reason why somebody didn't know that today was the day that they needed to be hands-free."

Electronic information signs along freeways had been warning drivers for weeks.

Officers of the CHP's Sacramento Valley Division patrolling in Auburn witnessed 47 cell phone violations between 6 a.m. and 11 a.m. They issued 20 citations and let the others go with warnings so as not to further clog traffic.

CHP Officer Tammy DuTemple said some violators had hands-free devices but had not yet charged or figured our how to use them. "People know about the law, but just like everything else, they wait until the last minute," she said.

Hoglund said she noticed a difference in motorists' behavior Tuesday. "I did not see one person holding the phone," she said.

Lt. Rick Handfield, a spokesman for Irvine police, said even he had to adjust to the new law. His phone rang as he was driving Tuesday and his Bluetooth headset was in his office charging.

"I had to think, 'What am I going to do with this call?'" he said. "I think I did the right thing by sending it to voicemail, but I think there will be a learning curve. I do think it'll be a paradigm shift."

Motorists also were rushing to purchase hands-free devices.

Dewey Oates, who owns two Los Angeles roadside stands that sell phone accessories, said for the past week he has sold 50 to 75 Bluetooth wireless headsets a day — as many of the $40 devices as he usually sells in a year — not to mention hundreds of cheaper, plug-in devices.

"From a business point of view, yes, and from a safety point of view, we enjoy it," Oates said.

The law requires use of a hands-free device by drivers over 18 except in a medical or traffic emergency. Text-messaging is not specifically banned for adults, but the California Highway Patrol said they can be cited for negligence under existing laws.

A second law that took effect Tuesday bars drivers under age 18 from using a wireless telephone, pager, laptop or any other electronic communication or mobile service device while driving. The ban extends to hands-free usage and text-messaging.

The laws carry a minimum fine of $20 for the first ticket and $50 for subsequent ones but with court fees tacked on, the real cost in Los Angeles County will run about $93 for the first ticket and $201 for the next, according to Superior Court calculations.

While five other states and Washington, D.C., have adopted hands-free laws, the law in California could put a dent in the state's image as the capital of car-crazy narcissism. California has nearly 22.9 million licensed drivers, far more than any other state, according to 2005 statistics from the Federal Highway Administration.

Authorities hope it also will reduce traffic accidents. Several studies have shown that using cell phones distract drivers and may increase accidents, although there is scant evidence that using a hands-free device mitigates the problem.

New York, the first state to enact a hands-free law in 2001, reported 1,170 crashes from 2001 through 2006 where handheld cell phones were considered a factor, versus 214 involving hands-free devices, according to the state Department of Motor Vehicles.

Forcing motorists to use hands-free devices won't eliminate the distraction of an engrossing conversation or heated argument but it might reduce fender-benders by forcing drivers to keep at least one hand on the wheel, Hoglund said.

At least with a hands-free cell phone, "when you're drinking your coffee and on the phone and smoking a cigarette, you're not driving with your knee any more," she said.

___

Associated Press writers Gillian Flaccus, Elliot Spagat and Malia Wollan contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

The California Department of Motor Vehicles: http://www.dmv.ca.gov/cellularphonelaws/index.htm

  • 3 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.6
{"commentId":2084202,"authorDomain":"nixxie"}

I actually resent that "People over 28 don't know how to use their phones very well."!!!! I could probably out text her in a heart beat and I am 37!

One should not be allowed to use the cell phone while driving unless one is using a hands free device PERIOD! END OF DISCUSSION!

{"commentId":2084202,"threadId":"302441","contentId":"1624785","authorDomain":"nixxie"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:17 AM EDT
{"commentId":2085053,"authorDomain":"divbyzero"}

A former coworker of mine struck a brick mailbox and barely missed a pedestrian while texting and driving, and she's the type who could text while hanging upside down while wearing a blindfold. Distracted driving is dangerous but most people don't seem to realize it until they've had an accident.

{"commentId":2085053,"threadId":"302441","contentId":"1624785","authorDomain":"divbyzero"}
    Reply#2 - Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:30 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2086334,"authorDomain":"marcowhm"}

    I hope to see more legislation of this kind being enacted. People will refuse to buy a smaller more fuel-efficient vehicle, citing safety concerns and yet they refuse to increase their safety by taking one simple step by putting down the phone and focusing on driving. I think it is also foolish to entrust your saftey on the road to one's own driving skills alone. A large part of driving is "defensive driving" where one takes into account not only one's own skills, but also the skills (or lack thereof) of others. I would think that instead of looking at this from the perspective that I am a good enough driver to text while I'm driving, people could look at it from the perspective that the "no-driver" heading towards you at the next intersection may not be.

    {"commentId":2086334,"threadId":"302441","contentId":"1624785","authorDomain":"marcowhm"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2086464,"authorDomain":"divbyzero"}

    That's the way I look at it too. I may be a good enough driver to talk on the phone, eat, and tune to another radio station while driving but what is the person in the lane beside me doing? What unexpected event might happen in the next mile of roadway? In my area a woman was recently decapitated when a trailer that was being towed by a truck came loose from its hitch and veered across the median to strike her car head-on. It's those kinds of totally unexpected events that keep me off the phone while I'm driving. There was an anecdote I heard many years ago about how the first German cars sold in the U.S. didn't have cupholders. Unlike Americans, Germans at the time didn't eat or drink while driving, so the first cars they shipped over here didn't come equipped for it. If we would eliminate distractions our roads would be safer.

    {"commentId":2086464,"threadId":"302441","contentId":"1624785","authorDomain":"divbyzero"}
    • 1 vote
    #3.1 - Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":2090883,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

    Teenagers, despite any possible caution show when driving, are still not fully aware of the dangers posed when distracted. Most simply don't have the experience . There are plenty of adults who've never learned either. But the idea should be to instill good practices in the kids, especially given the tendency of many have to feel indestructible, and text messaging or talking on the phone while driving is not a good or safe practice.

    {"commentId":2090883,"threadId":"302441","contentId":"1624785","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:45 PM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"302441","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"302441","contentId":"1624785"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking