WASHINGTON — The nation's top economic officials urged Congress on Thursday to give them new regulatory tools to better protect the country from economic and financial havoc if a major Wall Street firm were to fail.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson made the recommendations in a joint appearance before the House Financial Services Committee as fresh worries gripped investors about the financial shape of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as well as investment bank Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Both Bernanke and Paulson endorsed creating new procedures by which the government can guide an orderly liquidation of a failing investment bank in an effort to minimize any fallout that might be inflicted on the broader financial system and the overall economy. Such procedures, which are in place for commercial banks, might have made the dissolution of investment firm Bear Stearns more orderly.
Although Bernanke defended the Fed's controversial decision to financially back JP Morgan Chase's takeover of the Bear Stearns, the Fed chief said, "This is not something I want to do again" were other investment firms to falter.
Given a crush of other business, Congress is unlikely to give financial regulators new powers this year. It will be for the next president and the next Congress to grapple with.
The committee's chairman, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., suggested it was more important for Congress to "do it right" rather than act quickly on substantial legislative changes. Bernanke and Paulson agreed with that assessment. "Realistically it is going to be difficult to get things done this year," Paulson acknowledged.
Still, new powers could help insulate the financial system — U.S. taxpayers — from getting walloped if a big financial company were to collapse, Bernanke and Paulson said.
"In light of the Bear Stearns episode, Congress may wish to consider whether new tools are needed for ensuring an orderly liquidation of a systemically important securities firm that is on the verge of bankruptcy, together with a more formal process for deciding when to use those tools," Bernanke said.
Paulson, who recently laid out such a proposal, said: "It is clear that some institutions, if they fail, can have a systemic impact." However, financial players need to be disciplined in managing risk and not expect the government to fly to their rescue, he added. "For market discipline to effectively constrain risk, financial institutions must be allowed to fail," he said.
The recommendations were part of a broader debate about the best ways to revamp the country's antiquated regulatory system. The idea is to brace the system to better respond to modern-day crises like the housing and credit debacles that have badly bruised the economy.
The Treasury chief also sought Thursday to calm investor jitters about the financial health of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They are "working through this challenging period," Paulson told Congress. "Their regulator has made clear that they are adequately capitalized."
Shares of Fannie and Freddie tumbled Thursday amid widespread fears on Wall Street that shareholders will be wiped out if the government is forced to rescue the two companies.
Asked whether such companies could pose a risk to the U.S. financial system, Paulson replied: "In today's world, it is not helpful to speculate about any financial institution and systemic risk."
Meanwhile, Lehman Brothers, the nation's fourth-largest investment bank, is seen by many analysts to be the weakest of Wall Street's biggest firms. The company's shares plunged Thursday morning. Concerns emerged about Lehman's liquidity and leverage last month after the investment bank reported an unexpected $3 billion loss for the second quarter.
Of the broader financial system, Paulson said: "Right now we're going through a period of unusual turmoil" and the government's focus needs to be on stabilizing the situation. Bernanke echoed that sentiment.
On the weakened value of the U.S. dollar, which has boosted exports but contributed to high oil prices, Paulson said: "We want a strong dollar. A strong dollar is in our nation's interest. ... We're going through a tough period right now."
Bernanke has called for stronger oversight of big Wall Street firms, which are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Those firms have been given unprecedented — albeit temporary — access to tap the Fed for emergency loans, a privilege that has been granted for years to commercial banks, which are more tightly regulated.
With credit problems persisting, the Fed may extend the lending privilege to investment banks into next year, Bernanke has said.
The Fed's financial backing of JPMorgan Chase's takeover of the troubled Bear Stearns has drawn criticism from Democrats, who call it a government bailout that could put billions of taxpayer dollars at risk. Both Democrats and Republicans lawmakers said changes need to be made to protect taxpayers in the future should another big firm get into trouble.
Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., said a "shock absorber" is needed to make sure that "taxpayers are not holding the bag. ... This is a tall order."
___
On the Net:
House Financial Services Committee: http://financialservices.house.gov
Currently, the Securities and Exchange Commission's oversight of these holding companies is based on a voluntary agreement between the SEC and those firms.
Nearly all the corporate limits are voulentary and the shift to a corporate government with the WTO as the leading authority is happening no matter what spin the press puts on it. The FED is a private institution run by the Rockefeller oil heirs and their closest friends. Congress will legislate to their liking, eliminating liability and providing discount assets like Bear Sterns whenever possible.
Its a way for berenke to say "dont blame me, it's power I lack, not brains"
funny soros knew it was coming and made 4 billion off americans collapse.. maybe berneke should ask soros where he got all his powers of insight from.
Translation:
Deregulation of a brutal class system, whose class mechanism, corporate global power, keeps destroying social wealth for class wealth, will lead to the collapse of the middle and working classes, the golden goose that lays its golden eggs for them, has finally been made so anemic from this exploitation, that the class mechanism, golden goose is in a fatal position, near death.
Here is the latest horror statistic of the class power of the super rich:
...the unprecedented challenge of a country in which the wealthiest 1 percent has over $2 trillion more than the bottom 90 percent, according to the Nation magazine. In other words, the candidates won't be asked in EspaƱol or en Ingles, "How come the wealthiest 1 percent have $19 trillion while the rest of us 300,000,000 only have a combined wealth totaling less than $17 trillion?"...
Quote from Common Dreams and Obama's lurch to the corporate imperial machine.
On target!
The wealthy have had but one goal in mind and one goal only; to become even wealthier. The problem is that to do this, the pyramid will eventually collapse and unless they can enslave the rest of us, the markets will just fail. Play this forward and consider that the marketplace will look allot less lucrative when ninety-nine percent of us will be unable to participate and only the one percent will be viable consumers! Oops, didn't think that through well enough while they tried hording everything did they! They can always trade on the world market with third world countries and people who live in cardboard boxes today but will follow the path America followed; prosper until big business will eventually outsource their jobs and way of life and move on to the next nation to "help along" while pure greed guides their actions.
Their money will be worthless soon enough when the once middle class is starving and famine in the streets of America is rampant. We former middle class folks are a resourceful bunch, remember, once we were the backbone of this great nation that has let so few impart so much misery on so many, unrestrained by those we once trusted. Is there any question why the congress has a nine percent approval rating?
I'm of the opinion that Bernanke didn't have an easy choice to make when he helped to finance the sale of Bear Stearns to J.P. Morgan. He could have instead let Bear Stearns go completely bust and risk a world-wide panic in investments and watch the markets collapse.
There needs to be requirements of the minimum quality-and-quantity of investments made. I'm not certain of exactly what those would look like, but it can be done. Bear Stearns was no small player in the market, they were a big-shot. If they can crash-and-burn so suddenly, so can any firm on Wall Street. This will help the market - the gain in public confidence will far outweigh such leveraged investments over the long term.
Regulation of a brutal corporate, global system, would slow down the collapse, but not the cummulative wealth of its aristocracy.
It's been much, much worse in the past in this country, and it did not collapse. It fought back. There's a lot to our market-based system that is worth preserving, once you strip away the utter corruption. Market-makers are necessary in a free economy!
While they are at it, abollishing the ERON loophole policy and over-hauling the U.S. Commoditiy Futures Trading Commission [CFTC] policies could reduce price speculation currently built into a gallon of gas. Thus, giving all Americans some rapid relief at the gas pump. Instead of a BS gas tax holiday which will be price speculated out of existence the next trading day, who do they think they are kidding!
The sooner everyone associated with the bush administration is relieved of their position and replaced by non-basis competent individuals, the sooner this country can get back to fair and balanced capitalism.
It should be a long time before the republicans get into office, if ever again [without a really fair and trust worthy candidate] in my opinion; they have shown their stripes [for the top 5%] this time!
Do not give them any more power they are the ones who put us in this mess anyway, if a company fail because bad debt to bad. They took on bad loans just to get higher profit so if they fail to bad, it not our place to help them. Did they try to help the people who they took there homes from no way, as a business you run it right or go under period.
If you and I was going to lose our house and business is the government going to come in and bail us out no way. The banks and loans company are no better than we are and should also go under,by having the government bail them out is saying mess up and we will take care of you no matter what who care if you made bad deal after all you should be held responsible for mistake and creed.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |