It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

advertisement

Be careful if you have saggy pants in the south Chicago suburb of Lynwood. Village leaders have passed an ordinance that would levy $25 fines against anyone showing three inches or more of their underwear in public.

Eugene Williams is the mayor of Lynwood. He says young men walk around town half-dressed, keeping major retailers and economic development away. He calls the new law a hot topic.

The American Civil Liberties Union says the ordinance targets young men of color.

Young adults in the village, like 21-year-old Joe Klomes, say the new law infringes on their personal style. He says leaders should instead spend money on making the area look nicer.

  • 19 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
9.8
3.9
2.0
{"commentId":2236241,"authorDomain":"crankyman"}

I live in a predominately white area. Even the white boys wear their pants down below their crotch. I don't care for the look, but I just laugh. I even poke fun a some of them.

Think of it this way. Have you ever seen someone try to run from police with there pants around their ankles? Better yet, they can't keep a gun in their waist band when it is around their knees. It doesn't work really well. Kind of like crime prevention. Let them fall!

Kind of silly don't you think? A total wast of taxpayers time and money on the part of the counsel.

{"commentId":2236241,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"crankyman"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:57 AM EDT
{"commentId":2236581,"authorDomain":"Griff69"}

They make me laugh as well... It brings back memories: A good friend and I were out smoking at work one day, when one of these walked by with his pants around his knees. As he passed, she slapped him on the back of his head and said, "Pull your @!$%#ing pants up!" (It turned out he's her little brother...) Now, I just picture that each time I see this "fashion statement".

{"commentId":2236581,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"Griff69"}
  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:59 AM EDT
{"commentId":2263746,"authorDomain":"lgoldman"}

The sagging and baggy pants were orgianally worn to hide weapons in gangland, and it is quite easily hidden...in todays world, most people are trying really hard to be that ghetto OG, just without the flare of having to do anything that would have gone down back then...its kind of sad really. Now while it may be their "sense of style", it's rediculous. Nobody wants to see their as$. What else is rather rediculous is how this page turned into a somewhat racist page to read...Not everybody sagging their pants are "men of color" which we all know means black, but plenty of hispanics, whites, and asians, all sag their crap they call cloathing as well...I think some people need to continue maturing and just get over it. Oh and Wardog, you're an idiot.

{"commentId":2263746,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"lgoldman"}
    #1.2 - Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:49 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":2240188,"authorDomain":"wardoglrs"}
    WarDog LRSDeleted
    {"commentId":2241536,"authorDomain":"spike41615"}

    @Wardog

    shut your mouth. Its that pant sagging crap that is poisoning this country. They dont have "to be anyone" else. But forcing me to look at their nasty ass and taste in underwear is rediculous. Im not "crushing his rights as a human bean" im just asking them to get f***ing dressed before they leave their shack in the morning. Its really not that hard.

    {"commentId":2241536,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"spike41615"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:34 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2246695,"authorDomain":"ansab"}
    But forcing me to look at their nasty ass and taste in underwear is rediculous.

    Teenage boys force you to stare at their tight little butts on the streets?

    {"commentId":2246695,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"ansab"}
    • 2 votes
    #3.1 - Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:21 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2246916,"authorDomain":"TheVerbalistx"}

    I saw you in the street doing exactly that last saturday. Don't feign ignorance on this one, pal.

    {"commentId":2246916,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"TheVerbalistx"}
    • 2 votes
    #3.2 - Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:47 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2261283,"authorDomain":"bargaincnc"}

    Yo wardog.
    As much as I would like to say that was an itelligent statement, I can't. In fact, even the grammer is downright pathetic. I'm surprised you are intelligent enough to use a keyboard, let alone a mouse. Grammer and ideals such as what you display are why nobody takes black men seriously. Of course I am assuming you are black. God knows why. You embarrass all black people with your lack of communication (and perhaps dressing) skills. Every think of why Obama doesn't wear his pants around his ankles while giving speaches? On the other hand, do you ever think?
    Yeah, fight the power dumba!ss. Better call jesse jackson in on this one.
    Ever hear the saying "Choose your battles well"? Probably not. They cover stuff like that in the 6th grade.

    {"commentId":2261283,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"bargaincnc"}
    • 1 vote
    #3.3 - Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:41 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":2244366,"authorDomain":"jennifer-troupe"}

    I heard about this on the radio this morning. The first thing that popped into my head was-- who is still sagging??!?!

    Didn't that go out with the grunge/loatie era of the 1990s?

    I support this law just for the sake of fashion!!!

    (Actually I don't care, but come on people. That look is horrible.)

    {"commentId":2244366,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"jennifer-troupe"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#4 - Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:37 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2245982,"authorDomain":"Prilj"}

    I agree, the look is horrible.

    {"commentId":2245982,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"Prilj"}
    • 2 votes
    #4.1 - Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:17 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":2245442,"authorDomain":"evilgenius"}

    There are many communities trying this lately. Not one of them has passed constitutionally.

    {"commentId":2245442,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"evilgenius"}
      Reply#5 - Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:32 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2261314,"authorDomain":"bargaincnc"}

      Wisconsin recently passed a law making it a crime to have sex with chickens. Why? Obviously there was a problem. My point is we should not have to have laws like this. People should just have enough self respect and dignity and common sense not to act like this. But...They don't.

      {"commentId":2261314,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"bargaincnc"}
      • 1 vote
      #5.1 - Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:45 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":2246653,"authorDomain":"TheVerbalistx"}
      {"commentId":2246653,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"TheVerbalistx"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#6 - Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:17 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2256043,"authorDomain":"snowbllind2"}
      BradC-388412Deleted
      {"commentId":2261101,"authorDomain":"bargaincnc"}

      "He says leaders should instead spend money on making the area look nicer."

      I think that was the idea.

      {"commentId":2261101,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"bargaincnc"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#8 - Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:21 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2261161,"authorDomain":"bargaincnc"}

      "The American Civil Liberties Union says the ordinance targets young men of color."

      It targets people with their pants pulled down. Yeah, tell your people to pull their pants up. No more problem. It's unsitely and disgusting and gives a ghetto image. Kinda funny how black men strive for the most repulsive image they can conjure up. Gee, why can't black men find jobs? Must have something to do with whity.

      {"commentId":2261161,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"bargaincnc"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#9 - Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:27 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2982273,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

      OMG!!! So what if a guy has sagging pants???!!! Big deal???!!! What about all the over half naked girls walking around???!! You can't get away from it!!! You see it on the bookshelves, you see it on tv, you can't get away from it!!! Why don't you do something about that??!!! IT'S ABOUT TIME THAT IT BECOMES MORE EQUAL ABOUT THE SEXES EXPOSING THEMSELVES!!!!!!!!! More power to the guys for doing it because I AM TIRED OF SEEING NAKED WOMEN!!!! GROW UP!!!! LET'S SEE MORE NAKED MEN and their butts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Girls expose their bras and their underwear all of the time!!!!!!!!!! Are they spending a night in jail??!! This country and their values is so messed up!!!!!!!!!!! GROW UP MEN!!! There are women on in this country that want to see things if you are!!!!!!!!!!!! GROW UP!!! That's the problem with this country, WE HAVE MORE MAJOR PROBLEMS GOING ON THAN A GUY SHOWING HIS UNDERWEAR!!!!! BE FAIR JUDGE!! IF YOU ARE GOING TO PROSECUTE HIM, THEN PROSECUTE ALL OF THE WOMEN THAT EXPOSE THEMSELVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      And those people's comments above me should comment on the half naked girls running around!!!!!!!!!!!! THERE'S YOUR PROBLEM WITH OUR SOCIETY!! YOU ARE MESSED UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      {"commentId":2982273,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
        Reply#10 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:34 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2982519,"authorDomain":"Prilj"}
        BE FAIR JUDGE!!

        I find it ironic that someone named "ignorant judge" would say this. :)

        And those people's comments above me should comment on the half naked girls running around!!!!!!!!!!!! THERE'S YOUR PROBLEM WITH OUR SOCIETY!! YOU ARE MESSED UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        That is what is known as a "double standard." Women have benefited from double standards such as "sex sells." If you want to fight against women showing their bras/underwear, then perhaps you should fight to prevent them from reaping the benefits of such actions as well. After all, fair is fair. :)

        {"commentId":2982519,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"Prilj"}
        • 1 vote
        #10.1 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:09 AM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":2984845,"authorDomain":"myriver"}
        Village leaders have passed an ordinance that would levy $25 fines against anyone showing three inches or more of their underwear in public.

        I can just imagine how many young bucks are running around with rulers with the sole intent of showing their butts without showing enough of it to get a fine. Heaven forbid they be ordered to shape up.

        When I come across sagging pants, and the bottoms that shine with them, I just go the other way. I'm not interested in talking to anyone who thinks I need to see their underclothes, some of which are so threadbare I'm seeing skin.

        {"commentId":2984845,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"myriver"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#11 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:55 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2991058,"authorDomain":"Prilj"}

        I agree 100%.

        Also, naked/half naked people walking around all the time is a bit... distracting. How long before men start telling women (like "ignorant judge") "excuse me, my face is up here?" :)

        {"commentId":2991058,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"Prilj"}
        • 1 vote
        #11.1 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:55 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":2988001,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

        to you who commented 'double standard' I"M FOR THE MEN HERE YOU KNOW!!! THAT"S THE POINT I'M TRYING TO MAKE!! WOMEN SHOULD NOT REAP THE BENEFITS FOR EXPOSING THEMSELVES!!! OUR SOCIETY IS SICK!!! But if the women are going to keep doing it and NEVER GET JAILED OR FINED AND REAP ALL THE REWARDS FOR IT--- until that stops, then go guys go!!! and for your info, i put ignorant judge because the judge is ignorant and sexist in NOT jailing or giving fines to all of the half naked women running around. WHERE IS THE FAIRNESS IN THAT???!!! I don't believe anyone should be running around half naked but until society changes their sick way of thinking where women always REAP THE BENEFITS for it, which is sick, then why shouldn't the guys show themselves!!

        {"commentId":2988001,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
          Reply#12 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:51 PM EDT
          {"commentId":2991589,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

          what are you talking about???? women have to deal with that all of the time 'my face is up here'!!!!!! grow up!!! you just seem to be jealous of the guys who have butts to show off in their sagging pants. your comment doesn't even make sense because 'why in the world shouldn't guys have to hear the statement ' my face is up here' when women hear it all of the time!!! you don't have common sense. the whole point is-----------if one sex can do it, not that they should----but why shouldn't the other??? what's fair for one sex, is fair for another. I am sticking up for the men. You don't even make sense when women have to deal with statements like that all of the time for men!!!! by your own statement, maybe men should get a taste of their own medicine. Wow, try to stick up for the male species, since I am a woman, and look what you get. Doesn't surprise me!! try to make common sense in your comments. hey go Bam Margera, go All Time Low, go Ville Valo, go Johnny Knoxville. They don't hide their sexuality WHAT GOES FOR ONE SEX GOES FOR THE OTHER!!!

          {"commentId":2991589,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
            Reply#13 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:34 PM EDT
            {"commentId":2991772,"authorDomain":"Prilj"}
            what are you talking about???? women have to deal with that all of the time 'my face is up here'!!

            Are you really not able to understand what I meant by my comment? I mean, seriously?

            It was OBVIOUS that I was making reference to the fact that women have to say "my face is up here" all the time. Wow!

            {"commentId":2991772,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"Prilj"}
            • 1 vote
            #13.1 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:47 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":2991666,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

            actually, the more I think about it, after your comment, the more men should have to put up with the comments. women put up with it daily. who buys all the perverted magazines and movies, etc???? men!!! you actually verified to me, as a woman, by your statement the mentality. HAVE TO DEAL WITH 'MY FACE IS UP HERE COMMENTS DAILY, BUDDY!!! What I can't comprehend is that I'm sticking up for the men more than my own species and am totally against half naked bodies running around BUT AS I SAID BEFORE, UNTIL THE WOMEN QUIT AND GET FINED AND JAILED FOR THEIR SLEAZINESS THEN NO GUY SHOULD BE JAILED OR FINED FOR RUNNING AROUND WITH BAGGY PANTS!! Big Whoop!!

            {"commentId":2991666,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
              Reply#14 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:41 PM EDT
              {"commentId":2991859,"authorDomain":"Prilj"}

              You just don't get it, do you? I don't have a problem with men OR women showing off their sexuality. If anything, I'm all for it.

              That said, as I stated in my original post, way back in JULY, I think this look (fashion wise) is dumb. Plain and simple.

              I have NO PROBLEM with men walking around with their shirts off, wearing shorts etc... You keep telling me to grow up, yet you're the one that seems immature.

              And, for the record, TYPING IN ALL CAPS AS OFTEN AS YOU DO, DOES NOT MAKE PEOPLE TAKE YOU MORE SERIOUSLY!!!!!!!! Quite the opposite, actually.

              Good luck with your life.

              {"commentId":2991859,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"Prilj"}
              • 1 vote
              #14.1 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:53 PM EDT
              Reply
              {"commentId":2991716,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

              MORE POWER TO THE MEN WHO CAN SHOW THEIR SEXUALITY WHEN WOMEN DO IT ALL OF THE TIME!!!!!! NOW IT IS FAIR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

              {"commentId":2991716,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
                Reply#15 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:44 PM EDT
                {"commentId":2991840,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

                no, you said 'how long is it before men have to say it?' it's right up there!

                {"commentId":2991840,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
                  Reply#16 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:52 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2991895,"authorDomain":"Prilj"}

                  The fact that you can't see the obvious jest is pretty appropriate.

                  {"commentId":2991895,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"Prilj"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #16.1 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:55 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":2991912,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

                  i agree with cranky old men.

                  Kind of silly don't you think? A total wast of taxpayers time and money on the part of the counsel

                  it is, we have so many more important issues going on in this country than whether a guy has sagging pants. go to your local grocery store, go to the video store, watch tv, there should DEFINITELY be some kind of control on the way women exploit themselves, EVERYWHERE YOU GO! Cripe, you can't even go to school without girls wearing shorts half up their butt and that's the POINT I"M MAKING. DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT TO BETTER OUR SOCIETY!!!! and then i will agree with the bagging pants. CONTROL THE WOMEN, CONTROL THEM GETTING BENEFITS FOR NUDITY, CONTROL THAT and make our society more appropriate.

                  It is totally a waste of taxpayers money if they don't do anything about the sleazy women that run around all over the country.

                  {"commentId":2991912,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
                    Reply#17 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:56 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":2992001,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

                    Truthfully, the whole point here is that no guy should be jailed for sagging pants when women are all over the magazines, all over the tv, all over the internet, are getting paid for it!! that's sexist!!!!

                    {"commentId":2992001,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
                      Reply#18 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:01 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":2992059,"authorDomain":"Prilj"}

                      Indeed, it IS sexist. But that isn't what I was talking about AT ALL.

                      I think women showing their thongs is a fashion disaster as well, but this thread isn't about them, so I didn't feel the need to comment on them.

                      I'm done with this article.

                      No hard feelings,

                      ~Prilj~

                      {"commentId":2992059,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"Prilj"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #18.1 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:05 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":2992024,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

                      just remember, I AM STICKING UP FOR THE MEN AND AGAINST THE WOMEN!!!!!!!!

                      {"commentId":2992024,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
                        Reply#19 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:03 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":3094178,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

                        The sexist judges who prosecute guys with sagging pants, better not be watching Mananswers tonight with all the practically nude when women are MAKING MAD MONEY on that stupidity! Because that would be totally hypocritical judges!!!!!!

                        {"commentId":3094178,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
                          Reply#20 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:44 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":3094320,"authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}

                          Prilj, thanks for saying that the thongs on women are a fashion disaster too. Definitely true statement. No hard feelings either.

                          {"commentId":3094320,"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420","authorDomain":"cynthiafalat"}
                            Reply#21 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:47 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":10405761,"authorDomain":"breelaboy"}
                            breelaboyDeleted
                            {"commentId":10405764,"authorDomain":"breelaboy"}
                            breelaboyDeleted
                            {"commentId":10434143,"authorDomain":"brianalampton"}
                            brianalamptonDeleted
                            {"commentId":10434162,"authorDomain":"brianalampton"}
                            brianalamptonDeleted
                            {"canLink":false,"threadId":"316305","isPrivate":false}
                            Leave a Comment:
                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                            {"threadId":"316305","contentId":"1680420"}
                            Start TrackingStart Tracking
                            Stop TrackingStop Tracking