Google believes $1B investment in AOL is crumbling

advertisement

In an assessment that could lead to a substantial charge against its future profits, Google Inc. believes its $1 billion investment in advertising partner AOL is souring.

The Mountain View-based company disclosed in a quarterly report filed late Thursday with the Securities and Exchange Commission that the 5 percent AOL stake that it bought in 2005 "may be impaired." Impairment is an accounting term used to describe an acquisition or investment that has eroded.

Unless there is an about-face, the acquiring company eventually must absorb a charge on its books to account for the diminished value of its holdings.

Google acknowledged for the first time that it might have to recognize a loss on its 5 percent stake in AOL, whose struggles have made it a financial albatross for its owner, Time Warner Inc.

"There can be no assurance that impairment charges will not be required in the future, and any such amounts may be material," Google said of its AOL investment.

A Google spokesman declined further comment Thursday.

As the Internet's most profitable company, Google could absorb a fairly large charge without too much pain. In the first half of this year, Google earned $2.55 billion.

Google bought its stake in AOL largely to prevent one of its largest advertising partners — AOL — from defecting to Microsoft Corp. The bidding war helped drive up AOL's implied market value to $20 billion, based on Google's investment.

Some analysts have suggested AOL may be worth less than $10 billion now. Google didn't estimate in its SEC filing what it believes its stake to be currently worth.

Gearing up for a possible sale, Time Warner is splitting up AOL's Internet access business from its online operations. EarthLink Inc. is seen as a leading candidate to buy AOL's dial-up access division while Microsoft and Yahoo Inc. could vie for online operations that include an array of advertising tools and services that still attract millions of Web surfers.

Microsoft wanted to buy Yahoo, but when the two sides couldn't agree on a price they separately began exploring a possible combination with AOL.

As part of its investment, Google has the right to demand that Time Warner spin off AOL in an initial public offering of stock or buy back its stake. But Google so far hasn't indicated any interest in going down that path.

  • 5 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":2397156,"authorDomain":"crazymail"}

Hmm, I thought AOL was dead, I do not know anyone who uses AOL anymore.

{"commentId":2397156,"threadId":"327964","contentId":"1729935","authorDomain":"crazymail"}
    Reply#1 - Thu Aug 7, 2008 11:58 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2397204,"authorDomain":"dumbboys"}

    What fukwit thought investing $1BILLION in the terminal failure that is AOL was a good idea?

    I for one am glad to see it fail and can only speculate that right about now, someone is adding up how much they spent spamming the entire world with those stupid CD's. I hate those thieving bastards and hope they drag Time Warner down the toilet with them.

    What the heck could they possibly have to offer a company like Google?

    {"commentId":2397204,"threadId":"327964","contentId":"1729935","authorDomain":"dumbboys"}
      Reply#2 - Fri Aug 8, 2008 12:05 AM EDT
      {"commentId":2398890,"authorDomain":"lakeworthguy"}
      Some analysts have suggested AOL may be worth less than $10 billion now.

      What the hell are these so-called "analysts" basing thier opinions on? What is AOL doing to generate value, let alone profit?

      {"commentId":2398890,"threadId":"327964","contentId":"1729935","authorDomain":"lakeworthguy"}
        Reply#3 - Fri Aug 8, 2008 8:42 AM EDT
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"327964","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"327964","contentId":"1729935"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking